Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? (7 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 21:27 +0800
   → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-13 17:03 +0000
     → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-14 10:22 +0100
       → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-12-14 15:49 +0000
         → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-14 17:02 +0100
           → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-14 16:30 +0000
             → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-15 13:37 +0100
       → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-12-14 16:01 +0000
 
Here is another arab like me Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 16:06 -0800
 
More about the essence of pure morality.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 15:51 -0800
 
Read it again... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 15:33 -0800
 
The essence of pure morality.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 15:29 -0800
 
Read again, i correct... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 14:08 -0800
 
The essence of law... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 13:53 -0800
 
C++ synchronization objects library Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 09:58 -0800
 
Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library version 1.53 Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 09:57 -0800
 
Read about my philosophy Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 09:51 -0800
 
Re: World Rubik Cube record: 4.73 seconds "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-14 18:24 +0800
 
Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-13 17:22 -0800
   → Re: Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-14 01:54 +0000
     → Re: Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2016-12-14 04:27 +0100
 
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube (13 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-06 23:04 +0800
   → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 03:47 -0600
     → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 20:32 +0800
       → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 18:24 -0600
         → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-12-08 01:36 +0000
           → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 10:36 +0800
             → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-08 02:56 +0000
               → Re: [OT] Posting algorithm "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 12:31 +0800
           → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 10:37 +0800
     → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube marston shores <kp@of.fire> 2016-12-07 09:47 -0700
   → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 07:01 -0800
     → Re: [OT] A: Rubik Cube equation? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 10:45 +0800
   → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-08 10:58 +0100
     → Re: [OT] Re: Understanding mathematics through learning "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 21:30 +0800
 
Re: Is programming a science.. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-04 20:59 +0800
 
Moving expressions for math and programming and other things juho.l.kupiainen@gmail.com 2016-12-02 07:42 -0800
 
Re: [OT] Turn-based games: Tic-tac-toe "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-01 12:58 +0800
 
[OT] It's a long (programming) road... (2 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-11-28 14:20 +0800
   → Re: [OT] It's a long (programming) road... Adam Jensen <hanzer@riseup.net> 2016-11-28 11:46 -0500
     → Re: [OT] It's a long (programming) road... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-01 12:37 +0800
 
Something better than MVC (Web) "chwilozof" <nieznajome@att.com> 2016-11-28 16:50 -0500
 
Re: China and Russia trump U.S. for the best developers in the world, says HackerRank "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-11-25 08:28 -0500
 
A problem about programming (14 replies — unroll) Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-23 19:09 +0100
   → Re: A problem about programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-11-23 19:36 +0000
     → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-23 21:04 +0100
     → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-23 23:38 +0100
   → Re: A problem about programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-11-23 21:01 +0000
     → Re: A problem about programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-11-23 21:02 +0000
     → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-23 22:38 +0100
       → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-23 22:40 +0100
       → Re: A problem about programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-11-24 09:33 +0000
         → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-24 11:18 +0100
           → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-24 12:49 +0100
             → Re: A problem about programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-11-24 12:08 +0000
         → Re: A problem about programming Lino <lino@net.com> 2016-11-24 14:08 +0100
         → Re: A problem about programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-11-24 17:14 +0000
           → Re: A problem about programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-11-24 17:18 +0000
 
own linking format (1 reply — unroll) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-11-18 09:18 -0800
   → Re: own linking format Ed Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> 2016-11-21 04:58 -0800
 
Store all HTTP headers or only used ones? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2016-11-15 01:21 +0200
 
Re: New special-purpose computer may someday save us billions fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-10-27 07:50 -0700
 
First Major Software Development Project (3 replies — unroll) Taylor Street <taylorkstreet@outlook.com> 2016-10-21 23:52 -0700
   → Re: First Major Software Development Project Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-10-22 06:22 -0700
   → Re: First Major Software Development Project "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-10-22 15:57 -0400
   → Re: First Major Software Development Project David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-10-24 16:25 +0200
 
Python | Data Science : Become a Data Scientist with Huge Employment Opportunities Jayanth Nair <jayanthnair40@gmail.com> 2016-10-18 16:23 -0700
 
"The median may not be more than one standard deviation away from the mean" (3 replies — unroll) Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> 2016-10-17 14:16 -0700
   → Re: "The median may not be more than one standard deviation away from the mean" Don Reble <djr@nk.ca> 2016-10-17 17:39 -0600
   → Re: "The median may not be more than one standard deviation away from the mean" Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-10-18 00:55 +0100
   → Re: "The median may not be more than one standard deviation away from the mean" root <NoEMail@home.org> 2016-10-18 16:43 +0000
 
Perl or C++ better (5 replies — unroll) "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2016-10-15 17:24 -0400
   → Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-10-17 11:20 +0200
     → Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2016-10-17 11:17 -0400
       → Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-10-17 17:29 +0200
         → Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2016-10-17 12:42 -0400
           → Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-10-17 22:50 +0200
 
Tunnelling and pathfinding (8 replies — unroll) malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-09-20 01:05 -0700
   → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-09-21 14:29 +0100
     → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-09-23 00:43 -0700
       → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-09-23 19:31 +0100
       → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-09-28 18:53 +0100
         → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-09-29 01:00 +0100
           → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-09-30 07:35 +0100
             → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-09-30 11:50 +0100
               → Re: Tunnelling and pathfinding malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-10-10 01:55 -0700
 
The Imitation Game luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> 2016-10-06 16:32 -0700
 
Re: Parsing and reporting errors? (5 replies — unroll) "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2016-09-30 17:17 +0200
   → Re: Parsing and reporting errors? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-09-30 16:03 +0000
     → Re: Parsing and reporting errors? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2016-09-30 18:45 +0200
       → Re: Parsing and reporting errors? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-09-30 17:46 +0000
         → Re: Parsing and reporting errors? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2016-09-30 22:07 +0200
           → Re: Parsing and reporting errors? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-09-30 22:50 +0000
 
Re: Parsing and reporting errors? (1 reply — unroll) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-09-30 15:59 +0100
   → Re: Parsing and reporting errors? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> 2016-09-30 17:45 -0500
 
Re: Parsing and reporting errors? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-09-30 18:09 +0100
 
Big data Interview questions (1 reply — unroll) vasuinfo1100@gmail.com 2016-09-19 04:25 -0700
   → Re: Big data Interview questions Arshpreet Singh <arsh840@gmail.com> 2016-09-19 04:59 -0700
 
Dungeon generation malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-09-18 15:51 -0700
 
What weird timestamp is this? (3 replies — unroll) industrial.one01@gmail.com 2016-08-30 23:54 -0700
   → Re: What weird timestamp is this? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2016-08-31 18:32 +0700
     → Re: What weird timestamp is this? industrial.one01@gmail.com 2016-08-31 10:20 -0700
   → Re: What weird timestamp is this? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> 2016-09-16 10:56 -0500
 
Many of few testing CGI scripts? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2016-09-13 21:52 +0300
 
Re: My Parallel Archiver version 3.65 is here... Unknown <no.reply@gmail.com> 2016-09-13 00:35 +0200
 
Hi everyone. "Gonzalo666" <gonzalo666@hdcbbs.com.remove-kei-this> 2016-09-01 19:06 -0500
 
Re: Read all my invention and my corrected text... fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-08-25 16:01 -0700
 
O(n log n) in place median algorithm (was: Difference between these pointer syntaxes) (4 replies — unroll) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-08-19 23:38 +0100
   → Re: O(n log n) in place median algorithm (was: Difference between these pointer syntaxes) malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-08-19 18:08 -0700
     → Re: O(n log n) in place median algorithm (was: Difference between these pointer syntaxes) Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-08-21 14:08 -0700
       → Re: O(n log n) in place median algorithm (was: Difference between these pointer syntaxes) malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-08-22 00:27 -0700
         → Re: O(n log n) in place median algorithm (was: Difference between these pointer syntaxes) malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-08-22 19:31 -0700
 
Excel in JavaScript unit testing pshirley669@gmail.com 2016-08-22 04:38 -0700
 
Re: Parallel archiver version 3.6 is here... (2 replies — unroll) Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-08-06 15:37 -0700
   → Re: Parallel archiver version 3.6 is here... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-08-10 09:30 +0100
     → Re: Parallel archiver version 3.6 is here... Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> 2016-08-10 14:48 +0000
 
To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute (44 replies — unroll) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-23 18:13 -0400
   → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-24 06:44 +0000
     → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-07-24 04:53 -0700
       → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-25 04:13 +0000
         → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-25 08:28 +0100
   → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 09:40 +0100
     → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-24 10:00 -0500
       → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 16:18 +0100
         → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 11:34 -0400
           → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 16:46 +0100
             → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-24 10:55 -0500
               → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 17:08 +0100
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 12:24 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 17:37 +0100
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 13:16 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 18:53 +0100
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 15:11 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-24 14:45 -0500
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 21:31 +0100
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 18:06 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 23:53 +0100
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 18:04 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 23:47 +0100
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-24 19:34 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-24 14:03 -0400
             → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 12:10 -0400
               → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-24 17:36 +0100
               → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-24 11:37 -0500
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-24 13:24 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-24 18:29 -0500
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-24 20:34 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> 2016-07-25 10:00 -0500
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-25 11:22 -0500
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-25 18:55 +0000
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-26 00:19 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-26 04:24 +0000
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-26 09:13 -0500
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-07-26 14:11 -0700
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-27 02:58 -0400
                 → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-27 13:47 +0000
           → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-24 13:24 -0400
     → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-24 13:40 -0400
       → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-24 13:42 -0400
     → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-24 18:29 +0000
   → Re: To all who write uninstallation programs for software you distribute SIKDER EMRAN <sikderemran4321@gmail.com> 2016-07-31 03:19 -0700
 
To hell with the program spec - I know what's best (35 replies — unroll) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-26 07:24 +0100
   → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-26 13:42 +0100
     → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> 2016-07-26 13:23 +0000
       → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-26 14:51 +0100
         → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-26 22:29 -0400
     → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-07-26 16:53 +0200
   → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-07-26 06:29 -0700
   → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-07-26 15:41 +0200
     → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-07-26 10:08 -0700
   → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "Ant" <not@home.today> 2016-07-26 19:50 +0100
     → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-26 14:32 -0500
   → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-26 22:26 -0400
     → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-27 03:57 +0000
       → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-27 08:21 +0100
         → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-28 06:43 -0400
           → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-28 12:12 +0100
       → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-28 06:40 -0400
     → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-27 08:10 +0100
       → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-07-27 11:04 +0100
         → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-27 14:05 +0100
           → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-07-27 18:21 +0100
             → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-27 18:56 +0100
           → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-28 06:51 -0400
             → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-28 12:26 +0100
         → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-27 19:51 -0400
           → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-07-27 22:37 -0500
             → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-28 07:28 +0100
               → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-28 06:54 -0400
             → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-28 06:53 -0400
               → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-28 08:38 -0400
       → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-07-27 05:52 -0700
       → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> 2016-07-28 06:48 -0400
         → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-28 12:21 +0100
           → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-07-28 08:47 -0400
             → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Randy Howard <rhoward.mx@EverybodyUsesIt.com> 2016-07-28 16:13 -0500
               → Re: To hell with the program spec - I know what's best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-07-28 22:38 +0100
 
ANN: Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library Kaz Kylheku <349-534-5780@kylheku.com> 2016-07-26 05:41 +0000

← Newer ~Page 75 of ~120 (articles 6819–7157) Older →


csiph-web