Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"?

From	Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"?
Date	2016-12-14 16:30 +0000
Organization	Fix this later
Message-ID	<o2rs0r$d8g$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<o2osu3$sm5$1@dont-email.me> <87fulrahie.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <o2r2us$o0g$1@dont-email.me> <o2rpjt$3e7$2@dont-email.me> <o2rqc2$7tn$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 14/12/16 16:02, David Brown wrote:
> On 14/12/16 16:49, BartC wrote:
>> On 14/12/2016 09:22, David Brown wrote:
>>> On 13/12/16 18:03, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Geneva
>>>>>
>>>>> The Declaration of Geneva, as currently published by the World Medical
>>>>> Association[6] reads:
>>>>>
>>>>> 7th sentence: "My colleagues will be my sisters and brothers"
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is this sentence necessary? :)
>>>>
>>>> Why was this cross-post necessary?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why is anything Mr. Man-wai Chang posts necessary?  He seems to just
>>> have random thoughts and post them to a random collection of newsgroups.
>>>  He apparently does not read or understand any replies, but uses them to
>>> inspire new random thoughts.
>>>
>>
>> You've only just realised this?
>>
>
> No, I've been ignoring Chang's posts for a long time (I gave him the
> benefit of the doubt when he started in c.l.c.).  He goes in the same
> bucket as Fir and Ramine - there is always a chance that they
> accidentally post something interesting or that triggers a useful
> thread, but mostly they are to be ignored.  However, it is perhaps
> useful occasionally to remind such posters of what they are doing - it's
> always nice to think that they might change their ways.

Experience suggests otherwise (although Ioannis Vranos, in comp.lang.c, 
was a notable counter-example).

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Thread

Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 21:27 +0800
  Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-13 17:03 +0000
    Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-14 10:22 +0100
      Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-14 15:49 +0000
        Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-14 17:02 +0100
          Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-14 16:30 +0000
            Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-15 13:37 +0100
      Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2016-12-14 16:01 +0000

csiph-web