Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6973
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Perl or C++ better |
| Date | 2016-10-17 11:17 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu2q1m$2np$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ntu6p5$uig$1@dont-email.me> <nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me> |
"David Brown" <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in message
news:nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me...
...
> Try Python. It will be simpler and clearer than C, C++ or Perl, and far
> more flexible than Bash. Since it is interactive and interpreted, it
> can easily be used in a "trial and error" style that lets you see what
> is happening (and what is going wrong).
Would it be good for scripts?
Bill
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-15 17:24 -0400
Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 11:20 +0200
Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 11:17 -0400
Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 17:29 +0200
Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 12:42 -0400
Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 22:50 +0200
csiph-web