Re: Perl or C++ better

From	"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: Perl or C++ better
Date	2016-10-17 12:42 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nu2v0d$m0s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<ntu6p5$uig$1@dont-email.me> <nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me> <nu2q1m$2np$1@dont-email.me> <nu2qn9$4e8$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

"David Brown" <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in message 
news:nu2qn9$4e8$2@dont-email.me...
> On 17/10/16 17:17, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> "David Brown" <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in message
>> news:nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> ...
>>> Try Python.  It will be simpler and clearer than C, C++ or Perl, and far
>>> more flexible than Bash.  Since it is interactive and interpreted, it
>>> can easily be used in a "trial and error" style that lets you see what
>>> is happening (and what is going wrong).
>>
>>     Would it be good for scripts?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> Python is used for scripts, and for big applications.  It is a very
> flexible and popular language.  Personally, I use it for most of my PC
> and server programming, with C mainly for embedded systems.
>

    OK I see theres a 3.5.2 and a 2.x.x version. Or version 2. Should I go 
ahead and look at 3? THis would be better than Java too then right?

Bill

Thread

Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-15 17:24 -0400
  Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 11:20 +0200
    Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 11:17 -0400
      Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 17:29 +0200
        Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 12:42 -0400
          Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 22:50 +0200

csiph-web