Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6971
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Perl or C++ better |
| Date | 2016-10-17 11:20 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ntu6p5$uig$1@dont-email.me> |
On 15/10/16 23:24, Bill Cunningham wrote: > I am used to programming in C. Now with linux. Could I get some opinions > about Perl and C++? The pros and cons? This is opinion no one is right or > wrong. I hear perl's easy and can be a shell language but so can bash. So > Would Perl or Bash be a better script language. That's a better question. > It all depends on what you want to do - different programming languages suit different tasks (and different people). I would advise against C++ - I've seen your posts in comp.lang.c, and know how you have struggled with just about everything in C. C++ will not be easier. Try Python. It will be simpler and clearer than C, C++ or Perl, and far more flexible than Bash. Since it is interactive and interpreted, it can easily be used in a "trial and error" style that lets you see what is happening (and what is going wrong).
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-15 17:24 -0400
Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 11:20 +0200
Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 11:17 -0400
Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 17:29 +0200
Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 12:42 -0400
Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 22:50 +0200
csiph-web