Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #51739

Re: Stack Sizes

From Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Stack Sizes
Date 2016-10-10 10:21 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ntgbl9$40n$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <87fuo8wsr0.fsf@nightsong.com> <xY-dnVB12fghPWrKnZ2dnUU7-eXNnZ2d@supernews.com> <nt8cs6$bmf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4f3794f4-58f2-47b7-8d27-b2b246e325f1@googlegroups.com> <ntfa4m$gmj$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/10/2016 12:49 AM, rickman wrote:
> On 10/9/2016 7:22 PM, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 7:52:57 AM UTC-7, Walter Banks wrote:
>>> The idea has been around since at least the 70's with the TI9900.
>>
>> Mark Wills is our big TI9900 guy around here.
>>
>> Is the IT9900 still used at all? I have read that it was the best
>> processor of its era --- I have also read however that the TI99/4A
>> was the worst computer of its era --- somewhat like putting a
>> race-car engine in a go-kart.
>
> It's era included the PDP-11 computer line and LSI-11 computer chips.  I
> think trying to claim some sort of superiority of one line of computer
> designs over another is a bit pointless.  How do you measure "best"? The
> TI-990 was a reasonably popular mini-computer line, but never had
> overwhelming sales.  The TMS9900 chip came in a humongous 64 pin package
> and required a 4 phase clock, not entirely different from many of the
> first CPUs like the 8080.  But the 9900 had exactly one significant
> successor,  the 9995 which had an 8 bit data bus.  All in all this
> product line didn't get much traction other than in TI's own computers.
>
> I can't imagine you can buy any 9900 type chips other than HDL in an
> FPGA.  I've got a 9900 computer board I modified to use 2716 EPROMs
> rather than the old 2708 EPROMs.  I also built a 9995 board with some 8
> kB of fast RAM and one EPROM.  Both are still around somewhere, haven't
> touched them in years.
>
The device was slow by later standards but it never stood a change, 
programming wise it was decent.

TI used every trick to possibly cripple the CPU in the TI99/4, 
unfortunately that is a horrible market ploy that most likely backfired 
on them. Most likely designers that saw the performance of the TI99/4 
were turned off before they looked at the device. You can still find the 
chips an the TI99/4 on eBay for all it's worth.

Actually those EPROMs you mentioned are rather expensive, the much 
larger sizes are way cheaper. The 1Mb 28c1000 parts are available 
inexpensively and are prime parts from distributors. I recently bought 
some 27C256 and 29C256 devices for a CDP 1802, and Z80 projects and they 
cost more than the 28c1000 parts which are 4X bigger and way faster. As 
soon as I can find some decent wire-wrap 32 pin sockets I will buy some 
of those chips and save some money on future projects even if I only use 
part of the devices.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-03 08:22 -0400
  Re: Stack Sizes foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 07:00 -0700
    Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-03 11:14 -0400
      Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Linsel <bl1@gmx.com> - 2016-10-03 18:20 +0200
        Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-03 11:30 -0500
          Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 15:27 -0400
          Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-03 18:12 -0400
            Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-03 17:52 -0500
            Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-03 16:06 -0700
        Re: Stack Sizes Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-10-04 08:31 +0100
          Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-04 08:46 +0000
            Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 10:38 -0400
            Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 11:59 -0700
              Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-05 09:59 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:16 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-06 08:21 +0000
          Re: Stack Sizes minforth@arcor.de - 2016-10-04 05:00 -0700
          Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 08:49 -0400
      Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-03 16:28 -0700
        Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 10:36 -0400
          Re: Stack Sizes Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@zxdehrnyya.cam> - 2016-10-04 16:15 -0400
          Re: Stack Sizes Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 09:56 -0800
            Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-11-12 09:15 -0500
    Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-03 10:35 -0500
    Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-10-11 01:01 +0000
  Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 10:21 -0400
    Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-03 11:06 -0400
      Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 15:22 -0400
        Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-03 18:04 -0400
    Re: Stack Sizes Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 20:46 +0200
      Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 15:40 -0400
        Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 12:26 -0700
          Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-05 15:44 -0500
            Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 16:32 -0700
              Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 20:01 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-07 07:39 +0000
              Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-05 20:36 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 21:28 -0700
          Re: Stack Sizes alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2016-10-05 22:07 +0100
            Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 00:05 -0700
            Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-06 02:17 -0500
      Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 19:27 -0400
        Re: Stack Sizes Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 18:58 +0200
          Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 13:17 -0400
            Re: Stack Sizes Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 12:35 +0200
          Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-05 12:18 -0500
            Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 16:07 -0400
              Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-05 15:50 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 17:36 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-05 17:14 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-10-05 14:48 -1000
                Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-05 20:49 -0500
  Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-03 16:32 +0000
  Re: Stack Sizes Chris Curl <ccurl609@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 13:53 -0700
    Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-03 17:54 -0400
  Re: Stack Sizes Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@zxdehrnyya.cam> - 2016-10-03 23:40 -0400
    Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 11:30 -0400
  Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 21:47 -0700
    Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 11:22 -0400
      Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 11:44 -0700
        Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-04 15:53 -0400
          Re: Stack Sizes Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@zxdehrnyya.cam> - 2016-10-04 16:15 -0400
      Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 14:31 -0700
        Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-06 08:48 -0400
          Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-06 13:08 -0700
            Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-06 19:11 -0400
  Re: Stack Sizes jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2016-10-06 12:08 -0700
    Re: Stack Sizes alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2016-10-06 21:47 +0100
    Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-06 19:05 -0400
    Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 21:57 -0400
      Re: Stack Sizes jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2016-10-06 19:21 -0700
        Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 00:10 -0400
          Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-06 23:14 -0700
            Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 02:26 -0400
              Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-06 23:57 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-07 08:18 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-07 10:52 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 16:22 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 01:49 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-10 10:21 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 22:39 -0400
                Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-10 12:36 +0200
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 13:45 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-14 01:16 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 20:38 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 02:00 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 18:38 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 22:27 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 21:14 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 00:35 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 23:31 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-10-16 20:36 -1000
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 13:11 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-10-17 19:14 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-10-17 21:53 +0000
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 16:54 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-10-21 22:13 +0000
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 17:46 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-10-23 22:26 +0000
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-24 09:13 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 16:28 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-24 17:20 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 22:23 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-11-04 20:39 +0000
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:42 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-17 11:12 +0200
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 09:20 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 19:11 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 16:40 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 20:19 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 17:25 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 20:50 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-18 02:04 +0200
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-18 06:13 +0000
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 15:21 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 04:09 -0400
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 13:48 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-18 02:12 +0200
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:35 -0700
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-18 12:53 +0200
                Re: Straight Forth Re: Stack Sizes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 12:12 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-07 16:53 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-09 08:34 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-09 16:03 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-10 03:25 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-10 10:29 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-11 05:19 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-10 14:41 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-10-10 20:23 +0200
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-11 05:16 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-12 12:54 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-12 18:27 +0200
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-12 17:06 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-12 13:01 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-12 17:07 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-13 03:18 +0200
                Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-14 14:26 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 20:30 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-13 15:52 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 15:05 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-10-14 03:08 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-14 14:41 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-07 12:33 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 01:12 -0400
              Re: Stack Sizes Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-10-07 23:05 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2016-10-07 21:56 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-10-08 07:23 -0400
                Re: Stack Sizes lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 22:39 -0700
            Re: Stack Sizes Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-10-07 08:21 +0200
            Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-07 09:22 +0200
              Re: Stack Sizes Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-10-07 09:35 +0200
                Re: Stack Sizes jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2016-10-07 10:51 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-10-07 13:21 -0500
                Re: Stack Sizes Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
                Re: Stack Sizes albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-07 20:53 +0200
            Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-07 07:35 +0000
              Re: Stack Sizes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-07 01:09 -0700
                Re: Stack Sizes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-10-07 15:59 +0000
                Re: Stack Sizes Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de> - 2016-10-17 22:05 +0000

csiph-web