Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671923
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: How is time really organized |
| Date | 2026-08-09 11:23 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6A78C5B0.2769@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (20 earlier) <ndnvo1F3pe6U1@mid.individual.net> <6A76D0CF.412@ix.netcom.com> <ndqpifFh8p2U1@mid.individual.net> <6A78366F.1C81@ix.netcom.com> <6A78B843.7423@ix.netcom.com> |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > Am Samstag000008, 08.08.2026 um 08:46 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Am Samstag000008, 08.08.2026 um 00:44 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >>> Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Am Freitag000007, 07.08.2026 um 07:49 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Am Montag000003, 03.08.2026 um 10:03 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 06:24:14 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch000029, 29.07.2026 um 08:14 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Am Montag000027, 27.07.2026 um 06:00 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Samstag000025, 25.07.2026 um 08:05 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Samstag000018, 18.07.2026 um 00:40 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Natividad ÃÆ’…Å¡lusarski wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maciej WoÃÆ’…ºniak wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2026-07-10 14:32:12.000000000 UTC. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is time. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no it's not; it's a event stamp regarding an unachievable reference of the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past. Time is something completely else. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In physics, there is such such thing as an "event stamp". > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An event is a point of (a) spacetime: it has a location in space and a time. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The date above lacks a location, so it is just _a_ time (based on a time > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard, UTC) -- but not time itself, which is a physical quantity. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, spacetime is 'coordinates free'. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You need an 'anchor point' to define space and time, because points do > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not carry labels or calendars. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Somethings you always have as reference is your own position and some > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time called 'now'. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, most of the time some 'here-and-now-systems' are used. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But those system are quite arbitrary, because you could possibly be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere else. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TH > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, guys say here and now...and girls say this and that. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I tell girls, you see this here, well I want that now! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was over here, and now I'm over here. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, here is the REAL here and Now... > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is here is here.. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now is very very far away apart from here. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now is everywhere > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is right here. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove the letter 'W' > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There?? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove the letter 'T' > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's all Here! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about Now? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now is like...WOW! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean, how do you measure here from here to over there...Now? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now...all the way to the edige of the universe...Now. It's Now now. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over there! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's now now. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over here it is the same now as over there. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over there! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's now now. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What time is it now? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have to look at your watch...you got the wrong time. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time now is...NOW! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What time is it now? Yes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The time is Now! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everywhere!! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem of course is...where does Here begin? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here or over there? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Over here. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What time is it now at the edge of the universe? Of course, it's Now. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The hypersheet of the present is actually invisible, because we need > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> light so see something and that needs time to travel. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in effect we can't see the hypersheet of the present, but see along > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> our own past-light-cone. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT cone HAS borders, because the past begins at the (alleged) big-bang. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So: no, the time at the borders of what you call 'universe' (which is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually your own past light cone) is, of course, not 'now'! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It would require to define the 'hypersheet of the present' and show, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that THAT would have borders. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But, unfortunately, you cannot know whether or not it has borders, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> because you can't see in that direction. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> TH > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The "cone" is incorrect and misinformation/madeup information. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Before the big bang (proto-universe), Time had no seconds no years. It > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was eternal time. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The big bang created time in...seconds. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a big fan of 'big-bang theory' and personally think, this theory > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is garbage. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I use the term "the big bang" because you guys don't like the word > > > >>>>>>>>>> "created" either. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think, that 'the universe' isn't universe at all, but what we call > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 'universe' is actually our own past light cone. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> That 'universe' is also 'stacked in time', what would make the entire > > > >>>>>>>>>>> picture unreal. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> What we see in the night sky does not refelct some sort of reality, but > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is composed of pictures from the past, which have different ages. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I believe one can invent a camera that takes pictures of the past, like > > > >>>>>>>>>> 10 hours agao, or two days ago..which can be used to idenify a 'crime > > > >>>>>>>>>> scene' > > > >>>>>>>>>> as it took place then. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It is very difficult, to artificially correct this error, because the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> universe is so large. And to know what is happening now in -say- 1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> billion light years distance would require to wait for 1 billion years > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (what we can't). > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> You can make a phone call with a quantum phone that the signal jumps > > > >>>>>>>>>> a billion light years away, and when the phone rings, and somebody picks > > > >>>>>>>>>> up their phone a billion light years away...You say, "I'm calling from > > > >>>>>>>>>> Earth." > > > >>>>>>>>>> and they will say..."How did you get this number?" > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Possibly... > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> But usual cosmology doesn't use 'quantum phones'. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Instead cosmologists peep through telescopes and gace at distant stars > > > >>>>>>>>> and galaxies. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> What is seen in a telescope isn't real and never was and never will be, > > > >>>>>>>>> because the picture is 'layered in time'. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> To see the content of the real 'hypersheet of the present' isn't easy, > > > >>>>>>>>> because you can't do that with light. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Possibly there exist other means, which allow to see into the invisible. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> But apparently those are classified, if they exist, or they don't exist > > > >>>>>>>>> at all. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> It is therefore kind of nonsense to discuss 'big-bang', the existence of > > > >>>>>>>>> black holes or how fast gravity propagates, if much simpler questions > > > >>>>>>>>> cannot be solved. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> TH > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> "Invisible"???? do you mean like ...hiding from us? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Nature does not hide. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sure, nature hides lots of things. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> What you call 'visible' (from the Latin word 'visio' - 'I see') is > > > >>>>>>> depending on your eyes and your point of view. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Both aspects restrict the visibility of real things greatly. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> It is therefore nonsense to require visibility, if you want to call > > > >>>>>>> something 'real'. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Visibility is obviously restricted by the frequency of the received waves. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Human eyes are quite picky in respect to that and respond only to a very > > > >>>>>>> narrow spectrum. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Also the locations would matter, if you want to see something. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> E.g. you cannot see the 'backside' of the Moon, if you stand on planet > > > >>>>>>> Earth, even if that side of the Moon is oviously real. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Than we have restrictions of the kind of interaction, because our eyes > > > >>>>>>> do not respond to anything else than em-radiation. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> E.g. longitudinal waves or particle beams cannot be seen, even if they > > > >>>>>>> exist. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Next nasty thing is time: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> you cannot look into the past nor into the future, for instance. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> TH > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I look at your...response and I seem to see a lot of...hot air. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Of course, they say air is invisible... > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> is water invisible to a fish? > > > >>>> most likely the fish 'thinks' he's flying. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> ... > > > >>>> > > > >>>> TH > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Air is visible. The color of air is Blue. > > > >>> > > > >>> From space it is a Blue Dot. > > > >>> > > > >>> You can look up and it's blue. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> You're walking on air... > > > >>> > > > >>> Actually, you are standing on the bottom of the blue ocean called...air. > > > >>> > > > >>> Get off my blue dot. > > > >>> > > > >> Sure, but the question was slightly different: > > > >> > > > >> "is water invisible to a fish?" > > > >> > > > >> And since you are not a fish, you don't know, whether or not fish would > > > >> see water as blue. > > > >> > > > >> To me it would make some sense, if the brain of a fish would filter the > > > >> water out. > > > >> > > > >> TH > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't say the ocean where fish live is blue... > > > > > > > > I wrote: "Actually, you are standing on the bottom of the blue ocean > > > > called...air." > > > > > > > > > > > > That means, on the ground where people are standing...all the way up to > > > > the sky is Blue... > > > > > > > > you live in an ocean of Air. > > > > > > Ok, that's nice very nice poetry, but doesn't cover the question, > > > whether or not fish would see the water. > > > > > > > > > > > From toe to all the way up is sky...the blue sky. > > > > > > > > The SKY starts on the ground where you stand > > > > > > Looks like, but ain't the case. > > > > > > > The sky begins on the ground where you stand and goes all the way up to > > > > the end of sky. > > > > > > > > If you have problem with simple terms... > > > > > > > > atmosphere is sky. > > > > > > That's wrong, because what we call 'sky' goes way beyond the atmosphere. > > > > > > TH > > > > at·mos·phere > > /'atm??sfir/ > > noun > > > > the envelope of gases surrounding the earth > > > > Why is the sky blue? I guess some of yous still have a problem with that > > question, i see. > > > > Yous haven't even figured out what a "sky" IS. > > > > or even agree of it's definition...typical. > > > > I understand Germans definition of sky is a cloud. > > > > dumbkoff > > I don't why I find myself having to teach Yous people kidergarten physics... > > i mentioned BLUE dot, blue sky... > > An atmosphere is the layer of gases surrounding Earth > https://www.google.com/search?q=define+atmosphere > > atmosphere(n.) > 1630s, atmosphaera (modern form from 1670s), "gaseous envelop surrounding the earth," from Modern Latin atmosphaera, from > Greek atmos "vapor, steam" (see atmo-) + sphaira "sphere" (see sphere). > In old science, "vaporous air," which was considered a part of the earth and a contamination of the lower part of the air > https://www.etymonline.com/word/atmosphere > > air(n.1) > c. 1300, "invisible gases that surround the earth," from Old French air "atmosphere, breeze, weather" (12c.), from Latin aer "air, lower atmosphere, sky > https://www.etymonline.com/word/air#etymonline_v_8078 > > Hell, you guys cannot even agree how many planets are there in your own solar system! Is it 8 or 9, or ten???? > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. The sky, from the ground where I'm standing towards 'up', is only around 60 miles. Of course, in Germany...when you reach a 'cloud'....kaput. Yous people are walking around on 'at the bottom' of the ocean of...air. In Herr Heger's mind, all the fish are flying in their ...sky. i guess they never learned how to swim... I'm in the mood for flying Fish and chips! I'm gonna open up a can of flying sardines. WHOA, THAT ONE IS STILL ALIVE!!! CATCH IT! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-17 13:36 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Natividad Ślusarski <rsi@val.pl> - 2026-07-17 12:10 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-07-18 00:40 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Cale Balabuha <eah@baal.ru> - 2026-07-17 23:04 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-18 06:34 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-19 10:44 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-19 15:55 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-20 06:18 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-20 07:39 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Ivo Balakirev <vaovb@kkrea.ru> - 2026-07-20 10:12 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-22 08:36 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-20 10:44 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-23 07:26 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-23 09:26 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Fayv Bakharev <kerv@aaaah.ru> - 2026-07-23 18:10 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 15:16 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-20 07:37 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-20 08:28 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-22 08:28 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-22 09:41 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-23 07:33 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-23 07:52 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-20 13:13 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-20 17:21 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-22 20:44 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-22 22:14 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-23 13:56 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-23 14:45 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-24 12:02 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-24 12:41 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Barton Valetov <btaovl@lln.ru> - 2026-07-23 12:54 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2026-07-23 15:54 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 08:31 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-22 08:41 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-22 20:59 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:48 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:05 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:16 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-24 11:26 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-24 11:42 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-24 21:14 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-24 23:05 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-25 11:29 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-26 09:12 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Vidal Bahovtsev <tald@lb.ru> - 2026-07-26 13:33 +0000
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-26 21:00 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-29 07:12 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-28 23:14 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-30 06:24 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-03 01:03 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-05 07:19 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-06 16:39 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-06 22:49 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 19:06 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-07 15:44 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-08 08:13 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-07 23:46 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-09 09:46 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-09 01:12 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-09 10:26 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-09 11:23 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 19:05 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-27 12:05 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:21 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Dolph Bazulev <vblpb@vuu.ru> - 2026-07-23 21:16 +0000
csiph-web