Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671594
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: How is time really organized |
| Date | 2026-07-23 07:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ncdmvoF5kh8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <113d641$1n26c$1@news.nntp4.net> <113eb13$1urvv$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <18c348350054dd59$1299084$2346$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <nc5qkdFs6tdU3@mid.individual.net> <6A5E5E74.50C7@ix.netcom.com> |
Am Montag000020, 20.07.2026 um 19:44 schrieb The Starmaker: >> This is time. >>>>> >>>>> no it's not; it's a event stamp regarding an unachievable reference >>>>> of the >>>>> past. Time is something completely else. >>>> >>>> In physics, there is such such thing as an "event stamp". >>> >>> >>> In physics there is nobody interested in the reality. >>> >> >> I'm actually not quite sure what an 'event stamp' could possibly be. >> >> Usually points in space do not carry clocks or labels. >> >> TH > > > an "event stamp" is not measured with clocks... > > if one wants to know which horse won...'by a nose', you > take a picture of it. > > A photo finish. > > The whole entire universe is measured frame by frame. This is simply not true! There ain't no way to make photos of the 'entire universe', because the universe is REALLY vast. What we see and actually call 'universe' isn't universal at all, but is physically our own past light-cone. This past-light-cone is actually depending upon our own position and ain't universal at all. To estimate the topology of the entire universe is actually difficult and hardly anybody does that correctly. My own way goes like this: I take a usual spacetime diagramm as a certain form of an Argand-diagram, hence regard the axis of time as local and imaginary. This axis of time is 'vertical' to the usual spacelike direction (of the observer in question). (This is what the multiplication with i provides.) Now to any observer belongs an axis of time and a perpendicular hyperplane of the present. Now these hyperplanes can have any directions possible and therefore also local times, which are at an angle towards each other or possibly also pointing in opposite directions. So: in the 'real universe' the axis of time is NOT universal. Also the local direction of time is NOT universal. In contrast we have to considere, that timelines exist, which point into opposite directions. This topology requires so called 'complex four vectors' (aka 'bi-quaternions'). Since harly anybody uses these constructs, hardly anybody understands the universe. > So in one frame, you have two noses that seem equal, but the finish line > is in a different frame of time. > One nose is a little ahead of the other nose at the frame of reference, > relative to the finish line. > The 'universes at an angle' are usually not visible. You can't see or measure them, even if they are there. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-17 13:36 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Natividad Ślusarski <rsi@val.pl> - 2026-07-17 12:10 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-07-18 00:40 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Cale Balabuha <eah@baal.ru> - 2026-07-17 23:04 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-18 06:34 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-19 10:44 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-19 15:55 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-20 06:18 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-20 07:39 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Ivo Balakirev <vaovb@kkrea.ru> - 2026-07-20 10:12 +0000
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-22 08:36 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-20 10:44 -0700
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-23 07:26 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-20 07:37 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-20 08:28 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-22 08:28 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-22 09:41 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-23 07:33 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-23 07:52 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-20 13:13 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-20 17:21 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-22 20:44 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-22 22:14 +0200
Re: How is time really organized Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-22 08:41 +0200
Re: How is time really organized "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-22 20:59 +0200
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:48 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:05 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:16 -0700
Re: How is time really organized The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-22 15:21 -0700
csiph-web