Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742228
| From | Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Surplus electricity |
| Date | 2026-03-24 13:53 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10putk4$1cd2c$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <10pfals$8fij$1@dont-email.me> <10pfb3r$7pri$2@dont-email.me> <n25bc8Flc1qU1@mid.individual.net> <10pk17m$1pupm$1@dont-email.me> <n2gamsFctvvU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 3/24/2026 1:32 PM, Joerg wrote: >> I worked at a firm that made ice on a large scale to cool the factory >> "the next day". My understanding was that their electricity rate >> was based on peak demand; their peak demand when the building was >> occupied and machinery operating dictated the rate they paid for the >> entire day -- even though the building was empty for half of the day. >> So, making ice had twofold value: shifted some of the peak load >> AND took advantage of electricity that wasn't being used (but was being >> billed). > > There are many nonsensical pricing/tax structures that result in bizarre > behavior in order to get around at least some of that. Businesses don't care about how nonsensical a pricing scheme may be. If they can get a commitment to a given tariff over a significant bit of time, then they can make investment decisions with that pricing structure in place. The unfortunate aspect is that there are no real guarantees for this. Tariffs can (and do) change. So, it becomes a gamble as to whether or not an investment decision will "make sense" in that changing environment. Here, folks are learning that grid connected cogeneration leaves you at the mercy of the utility -- both in terms of how much you can deploy and what that will *cost* you, in the long run (you are using a resource that belongs to the utility so it has an argument about how it charges you for that usage). It also forces you onto a ToU tariff so the extra load you have during those peak hours (e.g., your air conditioning unit) is billed at a higher rate than if you had the standard tariff. If you don't use the utility as a storage medium, then only local building codes determine how much power you can generate and how you dispose of the excess (run outdoor lights during the daylight hours to boast of how much "extra" power you have available, to the disdain of your neighbors). > I am largely retired but in California I believe we had (have?) a sort of > inventory tax or measure that took that into account (UDITPA?). Anyhow, when I > moved here I asked about the reasons for the smog cloud over Highway 50 only in > December. I was told it was trucks carting lots of inventory to warehouses in > Nevada. And then back. Yes. Because it only matters where the inventory is located at year's end. Prorate this for number of days in each locality and the behavior changes because the economics change. A national vendor used to ship all of their surplus electronic equipment to us for disposal. Amusing to think they could ship things across the country (at least one semi-trailer every couple of weeks) for less money than they could save via the charitable tax deduction. I buy VRLA batteries in lots of 10 because that's what a lot of *8* would cost. Even if I threw away two of them... >> Making ice on that large of a scale likely took a huge investment >> in capital equipment. But, was also a huge energy "saver" (misnomer). >> >> As with pools, many parts of the country don't have/need air conditioning >> (at least not on the scale and frequency that we use it here -- 101F >> yesterday) so it loses its value as a potential solution on those grounds. > > Same in Germany where I grew up. A/C wasn't needed. However, they used the same > concept for heating, converting lots of electrical kWh into thermal energy and > then storing that for the next day in a massive amount of dense bricks. > Insulation only does so much and some of that heat leaked out overnight when it > wasn't needed. But, if the energy costs are negligible (or nil), who cares if you only net 10% from it? If that 10% will justify the capital equipment outlay and operating costs...
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-18 15:09 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2026-03-18 23:58 +0100
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-18 16:05 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-03-18 23:18 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-18 17:16 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-19 15:31 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 09:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-19 18:13 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 13:30 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-20 16:29 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 13:43 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-20 23:53 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 18:01 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-20 09:36 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-20 10:46 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-03-20 19:14 +0100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 14:13 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-20 15:28 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 16:42 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 07:18 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 09:41 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 10:36 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 11:12 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-23 23:30 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 08:55 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 15:59 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-23 08:22 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-21 11:15 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 13:00 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 13:42 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 15:18 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-24 15:33 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 10:47 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 13:32 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 13:53 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 14:17 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 17:53 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 20:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 21:21 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 00:14 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 02:25 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 07:05 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 12:30 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 13:29 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 14:47 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:00 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:20 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 18:20 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-25 22:21 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 07:10 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 01:28 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 07:45 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 16:31 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 09:17 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 15:38 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 14:32 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 14:52 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:11 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-26 21:17 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 22:01 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 15:52 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-26 20:58 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 16:51 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-26 02:48 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-27 01:25 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-26 07:48 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-27 15:19 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 04:24 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 01:55 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 11:43 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 15:37 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-29 12:10 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-30 14:47 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 08:09 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 16:13 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 10:59 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 15:10 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 01:08 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-31 20:34 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 15:36 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 01:10 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 02:25 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-01 12:35 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 14:54 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 00:07 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 17:40 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 06:53 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 10:32 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 02:45 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 09:06 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 09:16 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 08:07 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 09:04 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 08:05 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 03:16 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 20:51 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 16:29 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 07:22 +0100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 12:17 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 05:10 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 19:16 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-03 16:30 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 17:05 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-04 11:02 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 16:55 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-04 11:35 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 12:53 +1000
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 00:29 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 15:46 +1000
Re: Surplus electricity "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 01:55 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 16:57 +1000
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-26 18:30 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 02:15 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 16:19 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-27 10:10 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 15:22 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 13:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2026-03-18 23:25 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity bitrex <user@example.net> - 2026-03-18 23:15 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2026-03-19 12:36 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 06:36 -0700
Re:Surplus electricity Martin Rid <martin_riddle@verison.net> - 2026-03-19 10:42 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-19 08:13 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2026-03-19 13:05 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 13:51 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2026-03-20 08:04 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-20 09:32 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 10:36 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 13:47 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-20 15:38 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2026-03-20 22:32 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 16:39 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-03-21 12:53 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 07:19 -0700
csiph-web