Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design

sci.electronics.design

374702 articles, 460 threads (numbers 359226 – 744116) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
A danger to low orbit satellites Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-05-22 06:22 +0000
 
flimsy UFOs (20 replies) john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-17 20:52 -0700
   → Re: flimsy UFOs "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-18 00:05 -0400
     → Re: flimsy UFOs "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-18 00:23 -0400
       → Re: flimsy UFOs brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> 2026-05-18 06:14 +0100
         → Re: flimsy UFOs "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-18 11:13 -0400
           → Re: flimsy UFOs brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> 2026-05-18 16:31 +0100
     → Re: flimsy UFOs Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2026-05-18 12:32 +0000
   → Re: flimsy UFOs Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> 2026-05-18 08:47 +0200
     → Re: flimsy UFOs Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-05-18 09:14 +0000
     → Re: flimsy UFOs Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> 2026-05-18 11:30 +0200
   → Re: flimsy UFOs Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> 2026-05-18 13:01 +0100
     → Re: flimsy UFOs john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-18 08:51 -0700
   → Re: flimsy UFOs Simon Simple <nothanks@nottoday.co.uk> 2026-05-18 17:32 +0100
     → Re: flimsy UFOs liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-05-19 09:03 +0100
       → Re: flimsy UFOs Simon Simple <nothanks@nottoday.co.uk> 2026-05-19 16:07 +0100
     → Re: flimsy UFOs john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-19 08:16 -0700
       → Re: flimsy UFOs Simon Simple <nothanks@nottoday.co.uk> 2026-05-19 19:42 +0100
   → Re: flimsy UFOs bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-18 12:58 -0400
     → Re: flimsy UFOs bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-18 13:03 -0400
       → Re: flimsy UFOs Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> 2026-05-20 13:09 +0100
   → Re: flimsy UFOs someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> 2026-05-22 03:45 +0000
 
power pours (3 replies) john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-21 06:59 -0700
   → Re: power pours Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> 2026-05-21 18:46 +0200
     → Re: power pours john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-21 12:22 -0700
       → Re: power pours Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> 2026-05-21 22:48 +0200
 
slick swtcher (6 replies) john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-15 15:22 -0700
   → Re: slick swtcher "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-15 21:04 -0400
     → Re: slick swtcher piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> 2026-05-16 11:32 +0000
       → Re: slick swtcher john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-16 07:15 -0700
   → Re: slick swtcher bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-16 19:09 -0400
   → Re: slick swtcher bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-16 19:12 -0400
   → Re: slick swtcher john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-21 12:29 -0700
 
Alex Lidow: Inventor of the Power MOSFET (2 replies) JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> 2026-05-20 22:38 +0100
   → Re: Alex Lidow: Inventor of the Power MOSFET piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> 2026-05-20 22:09 +0000
   → Re: Alex Lidow: Inventor of the Power MOSFET john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-21 10:59 -0700
 
we are just an investment toy (72 replies) john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-07 07:44 -0700
   → Re: we are just an investment toy Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> 2026-05-07 17:25 +0200
   → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-08 02:38 +1000
     → Re: we are just an investment toy Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-07 17:59 +0100
     → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-08 01:28 -0700
       → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-08 22:39 +1000
         → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-08 09:43 -0700
           → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-08 18:15 +0000
             → Re: we are just an investment toy Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> 2026-05-08 22:25 +0200
               → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-08 20:54 +0000
             → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-09 10:47 -0700
               → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-09 11:21 -0700
               → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-10 04:49 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-09 12:06 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-09 19:23 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-09 13:13 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-09 21:00 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-09 17:17 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-10 20:40 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-10 16:39 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-11 20:13 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-11 06:48 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-12 00:38 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-11 09:08 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-12 14:19 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-12 01:52 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-13 01:34 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-12 08:44 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 09:50 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 09:58 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 10:56 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-12 11:25 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-13 20:01 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-11 20:20 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-11 14:02 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-11 21:14 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-11 19:49 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-10 20:35 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-10 06:16 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-11 01:41 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-05-10 16:30 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-10 16:37 +0000
   → Re: we are just an investment toy someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> 2026-05-08 03:45 +0000
   → Re: we are just an investment toy bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-09 17:20 -0400
     → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-09 22:17 +0000
     → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-09 16:20 -0700
       → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-09 17:26 -0700
       → Re: we are just an investment toy bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-09 21:02 -0400
         → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-09 18:23 -0700
           → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-10 17:15 +0000
             → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-10 14:32 -0700
               → Re: we are just an investment toy JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 23:43 +0100
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-10 15:56 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> 2026-05-11 00:04 +0100
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-10 17:27 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-11 19:01 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-11 14:48 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-11 22:16 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-11 15:47 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-12 17:57 +0000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-12 12:29 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-11 14:59 -0700
           → Re: we are just an investment toy bitrex <user@example.net> 2026-05-11 22:45 -0400
             → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-11 20:26 -0700
             → Re: we are just an investment toy Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-15 09:21 +0000
               → Re: we are just an investment toy Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> 2026-05-15 06:50 -0700
             → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-15 06:27 -0700
               → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-16 01:47 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-15 11:24 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-21 14:24 +1000
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-21 06:33 -0700
                 → Re: we are just an investment toy Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-22 01:53 +1000
       → Re: we are just an investment toy Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 10:07 -0700
 
NASA's new AI chip could let spacecraft think for themselves (1 reply) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-05-17 06:18 +0000
   → Re: NASA's new AI chip could let spacecraft think for themselves Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> 2026-05-21 12:12 +0000
 
Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel (10 replies) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-05-19 06:30 +0000
   → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) 2026-05-19 09:26 +0100
     → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-19 08:19 -0700
       → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-19 10:37 -0700
     → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> 2026-05-19 20:17 +0200
       → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel wmartin <wwm@wwmartin.net> 2026-05-19 12:09 -0700
         → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2026-05-19 19:49 -0700
         → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-19 21:10 -0700
           → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-21 01:28 +1000
             → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-20 09:44 -0700
               → Re: Scientists just unlocked a cheaper way to make clean hydrogen fuel Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2026-05-21 13:51 +1000

~Page 1 of ~862 (articles 744104–744116) Older →


csiph-web