Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #741925
| From | Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Surplus electricity |
| Date | 2026-03-19 13:30 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10phmcc$10qai$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <10pfbru$3lbvl$2@dont-email.me> <10pff7o$9uvl$1@dont-email.me> <10ph4td$plm0$3@dont-email.me> <10ph9nu$sf6d$1@dont-email.me> <10phebn$ue51$1@dont-email.me> |
On 3/19/2026 11:13 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote: > Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: >> >> *Rain* water purification might be a win. I think it is most >> commonly used for irrigation, here. Being able to replace >> domestic water supply could be an asset (here) as our water >> supply is perpetually under threat. > > Rainwater is usable with only pumping and maybe sterilization input. At the very least, it has to be heavily filtered (we have a lot of crap in the air -- PARKED cars end up *dirty* after a rainfall). Each year, I inspect/clean the roof. A powerwasher dislodges "black crud" that is likely automobile emissions that have settled on the roof. And, we only get rain in two short periods each year. So, any collected rainwater has to be stored for months at a time. Rainwater harvesting isn't practical for irrigation (at least not for water intensive plantings) as there is so little collected (relatively) and such a big need. E.g., with ~11 inches of precip annually, we'd be able to collect (using rooftop, only), about 20,000 gallons in a year. Domestic water use is about 70-80 G/day/person so that leaves you with ~9 months for a single occupant. > That takes very little energy. Desalination costs about 1kWh/cubic meter > for seawater at the theoretical minimum. Realistic costs are 2-3x higher. We don't have access to salt/sea water so the larger problem is hte water supply, not processing. >>> Not worth doing everywhere, but certainly in some places. Reverse >>> osmosis can have a short duty cycle, at least shorter than distillation >>> schemes. >> >> I think RO produces lots of "waste" water (?). We don't have easy >> access to "salt water". > > Thus my suggestion to reclaim wastewater, which everybody has 8-) Wastewater is hard to reclaim, here, as they build on slabs. You'd have to plumb from *each* drain instead of trying to capture that water at one point where it moves to the sanitary sewer. > The amount of wastewater is roughly proportional to input salinity > over energy budget. If the input is cleaner, in the sense of > TDS, the waste amount goes down. I don't know how our rainwater would compare with municipal water supply (which is very "hard" water). As I said, we tend to have lots of crap in the air (think: haboob). OTOH, our municipal water is ground sourced so it picks up crap there. > All for a given energy budget and pretreatment cost. > > bob prohaska >
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-18 15:09 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2026-03-18 23:58 +0100
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-18 16:05 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-03-18 23:18 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-18 17:16 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-19 15:31 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 09:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-19 18:13 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 13:30 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-20 16:29 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 13:43 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity bp@www.zefox.net - 2026-03-20 23:53 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 18:01 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-20 09:36 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-20 10:46 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-03-20 19:14 +0100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 14:13 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-20 15:28 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 16:42 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 07:18 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 09:41 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 10:36 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 11:12 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-23 23:30 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 08:55 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 15:59 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-23 08:22 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-21 11:15 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 13:00 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 13:42 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 15:18 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-24 15:33 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 10:47 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 13:32 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 13:53 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 14:17 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 17:53 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 20:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-24 21:21 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 00:14 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 02:25 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 07:05 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 12:30 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 13:29 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 14:47 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:00 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:20 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-25 18:20 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-25 22:21 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 07:10 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 01:28 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 07:45 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 16:31 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 09:17 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 15:38 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 14:32 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 14:52 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 15:11 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-26 21:17 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-25 22:01 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-25 15:52 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-26 20:58 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 16:51 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-26 02:48 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-27 01:25 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-26 07:48 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-27 15:19 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 04:24 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 01:55 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 11:43 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 15:37 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-26 18:30 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 02:15 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-26 16:19 +1100
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-27 10:10 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-27 15:22 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 13:54 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2026-03-18 23:25 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity bitrex <user@example.net> - 2026-03-18 23:15 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2026-03-19 12:36 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 06:36 -0700
Re:Surplus electricity Martin Rid <martin_riddle@verison.net> - 2026-03-19 10:42 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-19 08:13 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> - 2026-03-19 13:05 -0400
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-19 13:51 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2026-03-20 08:04 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-03-20 09:32 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 10:36 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-03-20 13:47 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-20 15:38 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2026-03-20 22:32 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 16:39 -0700
Re: Surplus electricity liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-03-21 12:53 +0000
Re: Surplus electricity john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 07:19 -0700
csiph-web