Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #65588
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
In comp.os.linux.misc D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> With Trump v1 I hoped Australia's eternal arse kissing of America >> might become at least a bit less blind. Nope, still with 'em all >> the way. Same this time no doubt - Australian intelligence agencies >> will be the last ones to stop sharing every little scrap of info >> they get on anyone to the USA where they officially don't give a >> stuff about the rights of any Australian. Trump will keep the deal >> to sell us nuclear subs going, but that won't actually happen until >> after he's long gone anyway (out of office, and probably also died >> of old age by then). > > Is it true what I read in the newspaper from my little corner of the world, that > australia is turning into a surveillance state? > > Sweden is also turning into a surveillance state as well, so maybe this is a new > global trend that caught on after corona? It pre-dates corona. Really the USA started it, I'm not sure what exactly their legal basis is but somehow they can compel any tech company there to give them a backdoor (see Snowden leaks (which include showing the co-operation of Apple), Lavabit, etc.) and later in the 2010s compelled its allies to enact laws permitting the same thing there. In countries where the press still has a heartbeat like the UK, the legal changes get reported on and that causes some public debate. In Australia anything that your average "cat rescued from up a tree" reporter doesn't understand never gets covered properly in the press, so we've got even broader and more vague laws permitting online surveillance than the UK. I'm not sure about the USA, where the intelliegence agencies seem to have had a free-for-all for a long time. Although they do have some responsibility to the individual rights of US citizens, however no responsibility to the rights of foreigners who'se information foreign governments like the Australian gov. sends to them. I'm just waiting to hear about a data leak from one of these intelligence agencies. I'll bet it's already happened, what with Snowden being able to share the NSA's internal documents with the media, how many similar guys sold the actual collected data to criminals or enemy govs? But for that to be revealed publicly someone would have to find out from the criminals or the enemy gov. The NSA (or foreign equivalent) will obviously never admit to something like that happening, possibly not even to their own government. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 22:58 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:10 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-13 03:50 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:07 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:16 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:50 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-14 10:30 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:46 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 03:22 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:36 +0100
Motivation of High Performing People Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 14:56 +0000
Re: Motivation of High Performing People D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 22:15 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:53 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:38 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:13 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:51 +0100
Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 15:01 +0000
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 15:52 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 13:18 -0500
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-15 19:37 -0500
Re: Musk et al. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-16 02:00 +0000
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:36 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:52 +0100
Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:36 -0300
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:40 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 21:13 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:45 +1000
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:28 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:42 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 07:33 -0600
Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-16 13:47 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 15:18 +0100
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:41 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 18:08 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:31 +0100
Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-17 21:38 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:40 +0100
[OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-18 13:30 +0000
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 16:42 -0500
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 22:09 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:45 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 09:10 -0600
Re: Musk et al. Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-02-17 16:54 +0100
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-18 09:25 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 13:29 -0600
Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-16 08:57 -0500
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 09:13 -0600
Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:35 -0300
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 21:08 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 08:02 +1000
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-17 05:04 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:42 +0100
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 11:49 +0100
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:27 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:45 +0100
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-17 12:54 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:27 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 10:28 -0600
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-18 07:27 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:38 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:34 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:43 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-14 00:24 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 02:54 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:35 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:53 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:40 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:39 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:45 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 11:37 -0600
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:50 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:37 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:05 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:42 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-13 16:36 -0600
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:32 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:51 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored usuario3@esware.naleco.com (Usuario Tres ESware) - 2025-02-16 21:03 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-14 11:32 -0500
csiph-web