Re: Musk et al.

From	rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Musk et al.
Date	2025-02-17 05:04 +0000
Message-ID	<m1fub4Favr8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <67b106e2@news.ausics.net> <5b13c6d9-5265-9aca-e23a-ccd3ece28ae2@example.net> <6ef4rj1j2isam1b1te1ju4qcadc2l2n9il@4ax.com> <m1f2e7F70ugU2@mid.individual.net> <67b26091@news.ausics.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 17 Feb 2025 08:02:58 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

> Besides strict gun control in Aus (albeit fairly ineffective), I think a
> lot of the differences would vary between individual US states and
> Australian states/territories. Things like private use of fireworks is
> still allowed in the Northern Territory.

There is even finer granularity in the US. In many states fireworks are 
illegal across the board. They are legal in this state but are illegal 
withing city limits. The city's boundary is rather irregular but around 
the 4th of July you can tell where it is by the fireworks stands set up on 
the county side of the line.

It was rectified a couple of years ago but previously you did not need a 
concealed carry permit in unincorporated areas in the county but did in 
the city. On a national level it's even more confusing. I don't have a 
problem with that. I believe most legislation should be at the state or 
municipality level. If a state such as California has idiotic laws I don't 
have to visit there. That's immensely preferable to the idiots trying to 
pass national legislation. 

I haven't been in the south in some time but there used to be dry counties 
either completely or partially.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 22:58 -0500
  Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:10 +0000
    Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-13 03:50 -0500
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:07 +0100
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:16 -0500
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:50 +0100
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-14 10:30 +0000
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:46 +0000
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 03:22 -0500
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:36 +0100
                Motivation of High Performing People Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 14:56 +0000
                Re: Motivation of High Performing People D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 22:15 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:53 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:38 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:13 -0500
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:51 +0100
                Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 15:01 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 15:52 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 13:18 -0500
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-15 17:23 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-15 19:37 -0500
                Re: Musk et al. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-16 02:00 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:36 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:52 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:36 -0300
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:40 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 21:13 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:45 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:44 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:28 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:42 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 07:33 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-16 13:47 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 15:18 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:41 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:40 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 18:08 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:31 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-17 21:38 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:40 +0100
                [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-18 13:30 +0000
                Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 22:35 +0100
                Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 16:42 -0500
                Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 15:22 -0700
                Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 22:09 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:45 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 09:10 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-02-17 16:54 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-18 09:25 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 13:29 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-16 08:57 -0500
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 09:13 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:35 -0300
                Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 21:08 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 08:02 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-17 05:04 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:42 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 11:49 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:27 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:45 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-17 12:54 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:27 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 10:28 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-18 07:27 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:38 +0100
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:34 +0000
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:43 +0000
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-14 00:24 +0000
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 02:54 +0000
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:35 -0500
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:53 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:40 +0000
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:39 +0000
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:45 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 11:37 -0600
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:50 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:37 +0100
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
    Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:05 +0100
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:08 +0000
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:42 +0100
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-13 16:36 -0600
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:32 -0500
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:51 +0100
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored usuario3@esware.naleco.com (Usuario Tres ESware) - 2025-02-16 21:03 +0100
    Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-14 11:32 -0500

csiph-web