Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #65520
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored |
| Date | 2025-02-14 10:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m18k9eF5jruU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <m15k6pFlg2rU1@mid.individual.net> <5cGcnReFBprdLzD6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <563e6d1d-fabb-598e-e500-0bcb847c7009@example.net> <wtWdnT-WkNZRQjP6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <67e55c72-9634-7568-8a35-034bd127c016@example.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:50:34 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote in <67e55c72-9634-7568-8a35-034bd127c016@example.net>: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 2/13/25 4:07 PM, D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/13/25 2:10 AM, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:58:30 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Neural networks can likely do "someone in there" even better, >>>>>> eventually. At the moment LLMs get most of the funding so NNs are a >>>>>> bit behind the curve. New/better hardware and paradigms are needed >>>>>> but WILL eventually arrive. >>>>> >>>>> So far there is nobody in there for CNNs. You know all the pieces and >>>>> they >>>>> don't magically start breathing when you put them together. It is true >>>>> the >>>>> whole system is a bit of a black box but it is describable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, I agree about "CNNs" :-) >>>> >>>> As for LLMs ... dunno. Get enough stuff going there and >>>> something very hard, maybe impossible, to distinguish >>>> from "someone in there" may be realized. Then what do >>>> we do - ruthlessly pull the plug ? >>> >>> Nope. Volition, will to live, drive, goals are completely missing. The best >>> trick to find out if you're talking with an AI is to write nothing. A human >>> will write "hello" after a few seconds. The AI will just sit there waiting >>> for input. >>> >>> Yes... those things can be hardcoded, but what would make me impressed is >>> when spontaneous behaviour, motivation, will to live emerges on its own, >>> without being hard coded or simulated through logic. >>> >>> Then we're talking AI! >> >> I am not beyond thinking LLMs will eventually, maybe >> kinda soon, exhibit 'conscious', 'self-realized' >> intelligence. The complexity increases apace. At >> SOME point .......... > > I do not things LLMs will reach consciousness, looking at the technology, > training data and how they work. I see them as a potential "language > center" of the brain of a AGI. > >> But how do we KNOW and what do we DO about it ? > > We look at the effects. That's all we can do. > >> Those are the HARD questions. > > Yes! Let me welcome you to alt.philosophy! =) Hard and interesting > questions! There's also comp.ai.philosophy ... -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.14.0-rc2 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G "These are only my opinions. You should see my convictions."
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 22:58 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:10 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-13 03:50 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:07 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:16 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:50 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-14 10:30 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:46 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 03:22 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:36 +0100
Motivation of High Performing People Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 14:56 +0000
Re: Motivation of High Performing People D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 22:15 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:53 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:38 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:13 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:51 +0100
Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 15:01 +0000
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 15:52 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 13:18 -0500
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-15 19:37 -0500
Re: Musk et al. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-16 02:00 +0000
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:36 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:52 +0100
Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:36 -0300
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:40 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 21:13 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:45 +1000
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:28 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:42 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 07:33 -0600
Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-16 13:47 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 15:18 +0100
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:41 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 18:08 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:31 +0100
Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-17 21:38 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:40 +0100
[OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-18 13:30 +0000
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 16:42 -0500
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 22:09 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:45 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 09:10 -0600
Re: Musk et al. Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-02-17 16:54 +0100
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-18 09:25 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 13:29 -0600
Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-16 08:57 -0500
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 09:13 -0600
Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:35 -0300
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 21:08 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 08:02 +1000
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-17 05:04 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:42 +0100
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 11:49 +0100
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:27 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:45 +0100
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-17 12:54 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:27 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 10:28 -0600
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-18 07:27 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:38 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:34 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:43 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-14 00:24 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 02:54 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:35 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:53 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:40 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:39 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:45 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 11:37 -0600
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:50 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:37 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:05 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:42 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-13 16:36 -0600
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:32 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:51 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored usuario3@esware.naleco.com (Usuario Tres ESware) - 2025-02-16 21:03 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-14 11:32 -0500
csiph-web