Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #65575
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored |
| Date | 2025-02-16 11:51 +0100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <32971c2c-39fb-8a76-a4cb-ec19de4f717c@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <vonaet$3ejs3$10@dont-email.me> <395bbb31-d4c9-dff6-7424-b9dc9aa4b871@example.net> <vopo6i$3vcs2$6@dont-email.me> <c963ba03-b6db-50f9-046f-41f228157120@example.net> <646dndgW14Iu1Cz6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025, c186282 wrote: >> moslem extremists and throw sane and rational people into prison. Let it be >> known, that Vance critique of sweden, that there is limited freedom of >> speech there, was 100% correct. Let no mainstream media tell you otherwise. > > > By all the Euro news, Vance just FREAKED THEM OUT - by > daring to tell the Truth. This is the truth! That is why you are seeing such a hostile reaction, he got too close to the truth, that everyone knows, but that the people must not be allowed to know or think about. > No 1st Amendment in the EU - you say what they ALLOW you > to say or it's literal thought-crime. "Democracy", no > longer much of a consideration - just rhetoric and > appearances ...... Yep! Plenty of appearances. Just look at how many of europes political parties are 40-50-60 years old, power switches between them, not much changes. I'm also seeing tendencies of political positions being inherited within the same families. This is done by introducing the children into the youth section, and then helping them from inside the party to prominence. A shockingly small fraction of european politicians have ever had the experience of having a job in the private sector. They have no f*cking clue what it is like to work for a living. They just sit and play around with other peoples money, and are not accountable in any way. > Tragic. Deeply tragic! Europe has lost its soul. I think the peak was probably around 1890 to 1910 or something like that. Then the center of the world shifted left to the US after the wars, and europe started to die. > Oh well, in any case, there's no longer any pretense > about the USA being able to carry the EU on its back. > 1950s/60s yea, NOW, Hell No ! This is good. Basically it is the last call of europe. Will they shape up? Or will they just whither and die? My bet is on the second. I see a future where the EU will have another couple of exits, compensate that by letting in super corrupt eastern european countries. Slowly the EU will whither away until everyone just loses interest. > What's all this to Linux ? Probably nothing. Oh well, > threads "drift" .... This is the truth! After all, the people for whom politics is painful always have the option of blocking me, or ignoring the thread, so I lose very little sleep over time problem.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 22:58 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:10 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-13 03:50 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:07 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:16 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:50 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-14 10:30 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:46 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 03:22 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:36 +0100
Motivation of High Performing People Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 14:56 +0000
Re: Motivation of High Performing People D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 22:15 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:53 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:38 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:13 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:51 +0100
Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 15:01 +0000
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 15:52 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 13:18 -0500
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-15 19:37 -0500
Re: Musk et al. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-16 02:00 +0000
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:36 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:52 +0100
Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:36 -0300
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:40 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 21:13 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:45 +1000
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:28 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:42 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 07:33 -0600
Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-16 13:47 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 15:18 +0100
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:41 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 18:08 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:31 +0100
Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-17 21:38 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:40 +0100
[OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-18 13:30 +0000
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 16:42 -0500
Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 22:09 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:45 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 09:10 -0600
Re: Musk et al. Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-02-17 16:54 +0100
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-18 09:25 +0000
Re: Musk et al. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 13:29 -0600
Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-16 08:57 -0500
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 09:13 -0600
Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:35 -0300
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 21:08 +0000
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 08:02 +1000
Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-17 05:04 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:42 +0100
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 11:49 +0100
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:27 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:45 +0100
Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-17 12:54 +0000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:27 +0100
Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 10:28 -0600
Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-18 07:27 +1000
Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:38 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:34 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:43 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-14 00:24 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 02:54 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:35 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:53 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:40 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:39 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:45 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 11:37 -0600
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:50 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:37 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:05 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:08 +0000
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:42 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-13 16:36 -0600
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:32 -0500
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:51 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored usuario3@esware.naleco.com (Usuario Tres ESware) - 2025-02-16 21:03 +0100
Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-14 11:32 -0500
csiph-web