Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored

From	D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored
Date	2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
Organization	i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID	<a67a5368-b2cc-f821-7ebd-c96adb89b4a8@example.net> (permalink)
References	<R3idnTt4H_lt8DD6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m15k6pFlg2rU1@mid.individual.net> <5cGcnReFBprdLzD6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <m177c5Ftl7lU1@mid.individual.net> <L2wrP.4482$z8ke.294@fx15.iad>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> On 2025-02-13, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 03:50:11 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>
>>>    The "a few mistakes are OK" logic WILL be applied.
>
> It's often sanitized with that lovely phrase "collateral damage".
>
>> During my first exam with my current primary about 20 years ago she
>> offered a PSA test but explained that there are a lot of false positives
>> that scare the hell out of people. She would order the test if I wanted or
>> we could go the traditional route. I passed on the test.
>
> I went the other way.  I had been getting a DRE (digital rectal exam,
> a.k.a. the finger) every year for 10 years with negative results.
> My wife suggested a PSA, and I figured I could look at a number
> without freaking out.  The result came back 20 (where 4 is considered
> cause for concern).  I calmly asked for another test.  It came out
> the same, making it less likely it was a false positive.  Next step
> was a biopsy (8 on the Gleason scale), which led to a radical
> prostatectomy.  If I had opted for blissful ignorance I'd probably
> be dead by now.
>
>> At this point I've probably reached the status of men who die with, but
>> not from, prostate cancer.
>
> Me too - but I'm still watching my PSA.  It started slowly creeping
> up again, but a round of hormone therapy knocked it back down.
> Gotta keep weeding the garden...
>
> Please, guys, if you're over 50, get a PSA test.

Nah, I prefer my dignity. I've had a good life, so what do a few decades 
here or there matter in the end? =)

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 22:58 -0500
  Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:10 +0000
    Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-13 03:50 -0500
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:07 +0100
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:16 -0500
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:50 +0100
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-14 10:30 +0000
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:46 +0000
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 03:22 -0500
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:36 +0100
                Motivation of High Performing People Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 14:56 +0000
                Re: Motivation of High Performing People D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 22:15 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:53 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:38 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:13 -0500
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:51 +0100
                Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 15:01 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 15:52 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 13:18 -0500
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-15 17:23 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-15 19:37 -0500
                Re: Musk et al. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-16 02:00 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:36 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:52 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:36 -0300
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:40 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-15 21:13 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:45 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-16 20:44 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-16 07:28 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:42 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 07:33 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-16 13:47 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 15:18 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:41 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:40 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 18:08 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:31 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-17 21:38 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:40 +0100
                [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-02-18 13:30 +0000
                Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 22:35 +0100
                Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 16:42 -0500
                Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 15:22 -0700
                Re: Musk et al. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-17 22:09 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:45 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 09:10 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-02-17 16:54 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-18 09:25 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 13:29 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-16 08:57 -0500
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-16 09:13 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2025-02-16 16:35 -0300
                Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 21:08 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 08:02 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-17 05:04 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:42 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 11:49 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-17 07:27 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 13:45 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-17 12:54 +0000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-17 22:27 +0100
                Re: Musk et al. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-17 10:28 -0600
                Re: Musk et al. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-18 07:27 +1000
                Re: Musk et al. D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-18 10:38 +0100
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:34 +0000
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:43 +0000
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-14 00:24 +0000
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 02:54 +0000
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:35 -0500
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:53 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:40 +0000
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:39 +0000
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
              Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-14 11:45 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 11:37 -0600
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:50 +0100
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-15 09:50 +0000
                Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-15 11:37 +0100
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:45 +0100
    Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:05 +0100
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:08 +0000
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:42 +0100
      Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-13 16:36 -0600
        Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-14 01:32 -0500
          Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:51 +0100
            Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored usuario3@esware.naleco.com (Usuario Tres ESware) - 2025-02-16 21:03 +0100
    Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-14 11:32 -0500

csiph-web