Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #24199
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: WWW-safe Forth? |
| Date | 2013-07-06 14:42 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Message-ID | <kr93bf$erh$1@online.de> (permalink) |
| References | <kr76h9$dqd$1@odin.sdf-eu.org> <7x7gh4bv69.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <kr7d67$llo$1@odin.sdf-eu.org> |
David Meyer wrote: > Is there a general solution for setting up a sandbox for an arbitrary > program called from a CGI script running on a Linux+Apache server? The traditional sandboxing in Unix is done with chroot. The main concern with chroot is that you need root to do that - this usually means you first need more privileges to then have less; IMHO this is a very severe design flaw. Dropping privileges should not require having additional ones in the first place. There are other ways now like seccomp, secomp-bpf, SELinux (requires administrator to set up), and the AppArmor team is also working on a sandboxing solution... Read more here: https://www.cr0.org/paper/jt-ce-sid_linux.pdf Their conclusion is that Linux has no real sandboxing solution. seccomp is only made for computing (it *is* "real", but it is not really usable, since the privileged helper thread can't have memory which is read-write for itself, but read-only for the untrusted thread), seccomp-bpf allows to compile the filter for kernel calls into the kernel itself; it is not a "real sandbox," but it limits the exposure. It works since kernel 3.5, and is relatively easy to use, but you need to put it into your program, so it doesn't work on "arbitrary programs": http://outflux.net/teach-seccomp/ The four-level privilege architecture of x86 would allow to implement a real sandbox, by using level 1 or 2 for the sandbox supervisor, and using a call gate to this level for the kernel interrupt. This supervisor then would have private memory (mapped into the same page table, but with restricted write access). -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
WWW-safe Forth? papa@sdf.lNoOnSePsAtMar.org (David Meyer) - 2013-07-05 19:24 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-05 13:37 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? papa@sdf.lNoOnSePsAtMar.org (David Meyer) - 2013-07-05 21:17 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-05 15:22 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? papa@sdf.lNoOnSePsAtMar.org (David Meyer) - 2013-07-06 01:56 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-06 14:42 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-06 07:56 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 01:11 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 02:44 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-07 10:28 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-06 13:42 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 01:40 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-05 20:20 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-06 12:41 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-06 12:03 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 12:41 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-06 14:01 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 14:26 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-06 12:32 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 19:58 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-06 18:14 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 21:51 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-06 21:01 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 00:36 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 01:25 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 01:56 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 08:34 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-07 07:08 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 08:41 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 12:59 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-07 20:18 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-09 01:09 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-08 00:09 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 18:15 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 17:22 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 17:20 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 13:13 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 14:02 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-08 01:25 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 18:26 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-09 19:21 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 01:55 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-10 23:51 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 21:10 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 22:03 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 22:27 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-08 00:30 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Hannu Vuolasaho <hannu.vuolasaho@nospam.tut.fi.invalid> - 2013-07-08 13:08 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-08 09:18 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-08 07:02 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 09:46 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-08 11:04 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 12:49 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-08 11:26 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 16:28 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-08 11:15 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-09 17:09 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-09 12:02 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-10 23:52 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-12 03:04 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-12 03:31 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-11 23:03 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-14 18:15 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-14 13:50 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-15 14:12 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-15 10:22 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-15 17:07 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-17 01:12 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-17 09:43 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-17 15:04 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-17 13:50 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-15 07:57 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-15 22:45 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-15 18:21 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-15 07:52 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-16 16:15 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-16 08:17 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-17 09:33 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-15 22:40 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 03:26 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 01:46 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 02:39 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? AKK <akk@nospam.org> - 2013-07-07 11:56 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 03:20 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 01:21 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-09 23:22 +0200
csiph-web