Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #24525
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: WWW-safe Forth? |
| Date | 2013-07-16 16:15 +0000 |
| Organization | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
| Message-ID | <2013Jul16.181536@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <4PednaaEJdL3W0LMnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@supernews.com> <krv7r1$5e5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k4WdnaZ_ZdbZpH7MnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@supernews.com> <2013Jul15.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <D4ydnV1E-ZV5q3nMnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>I entirely agree, but I was responding to Rod's assertion that Forth was
>not secure because certain implementations always have the same
>addresses. That particular hack depends on specific knowledge that isn't
>necessarily true or easy to validate.
But if the supposedly secure system is really secure (not just
obscure), it does not matter whether the attacker knows the addresses.
He cannot use them to do things he is not allowed to do.
>> So I suggest that reading words (such as @ and DUMP) should work as
>> usual across the whole address space (assuming that the Forth runs on
>> an OS with virtual memory and the usual benefits from that). Only
>> write access (!, MOVE etc.) should be restricted to a specific data
>> space range. And EXECUTE has to be restricted to the words in the
>> sealed wordlist.
>
>I have actually worked with protected implementations in which there was
>no read access except to data space. And EXECUTE wasn't available (to
>users) at all. It all depends on how secure you're trying to be.
If you are really secure, restricting read access does not increase
security. And a restricted EXECUTE as outlined above does not hurt,
either.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
EuroForth 2013: http://www.euroforth.org/ef13/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
WWW-safe Forth? papa@sdf.lNoOnSePsAtMar.org (David Meyer) - 2013-07-05 19:24 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-05 13:37 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? papa@sdf.lNoOnSePsAtMar.org (David Meyer) - 2013-07-05 21:17 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-05 15:22 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? papa@sdf.lNoOnSePsAtMar.org (David Meyer) - 2013-07-06 01:56 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-06 14:42 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-06 07:56 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 01:11 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 02:44 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-07 10:28 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-06 13:42 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 01:40 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-05 20:20 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-06 12:41 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-06 12:03 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 12:41 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-06 14:01 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 14:26 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-06 12:32 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 19:58 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-06 18:14 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-06 21:51 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-06 21:01 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 00:36 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 01:25 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 01:56 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 08:34 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-07 07:08 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 08:41 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 12:59 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-07 20:18 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-09 01:09 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-08 00:09 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 18:15 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 17:22 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-07 17:20 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 13:13 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 14:02 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-08 01:25 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 18:26 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-09 19:21 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 01:55 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-10 23:51 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 21:10 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 22:03 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 22:27 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-08 00:30 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Hannu Vuolasaho <hannu.vuolasaho@nospam.tut.fi.invalid> - 2013-07-08 13:08 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-08 09:18 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-08 07:02 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 09:46 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-08 11:04 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 12:49 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-08 11:26 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 16:28 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-08 11:15 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-09 17:09 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-09 12:02 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-10 23:52 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-12 03:04 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-07-28 02:32 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-07-27 22:18 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-12 03:31 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-11 23:03 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-14 18:15 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-14 13:50 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-15 14:12 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-15 10:22 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-15 17:07 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-17 01:12 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-17 09:43 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-17 15:04 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-17 13:50 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-15 07:57 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-15 22:45 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-15 18:21 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-15 07:52 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-16 16:15 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-16 08:17 -1000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-17 09:33 +0000
Re: WWW-safe Forth? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-15 22:40 -0400
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 03:26 -0500
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-07 01:46 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 02:39 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? AKK <akk@nospam.org> - 2013-07-07 11:56 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-07 03:20 -0700
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 01:21 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-09 23:22 +0200
Re: WWW-safe Forth? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-07-27 21:34 -0700
csiph-web