Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #318

Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10

From Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10
Date 2011-05-06 02:59 +0100
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <ipvkla$eab$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <877ha5noqp.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> <ipujvd$utq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ipv5a6$udt$3@dont-email.me> <ipvd9e$u6h$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ipveqg$su0$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


I just found something really stupid. I have an old cable router that 
I'm now using as a network switch, and it was set to the same address as 
the Netgear router I'm using for my network connection. So rather 
surprising that I haven't come across any problems before. Doah!!!!



J G Miller wrote:

>>>
>>>
>> I'm currently using a
>> "Netgear RangeMax Dual Band Wireless-N Modem Router model DGND3300v2".
> 
> Which is a lot newer than the router I am using, so you really should
> not have a problem of too many simultaneous connections.
> 
> I am wondering -- do you have a static IP address assigned to the
> 32bit and to the 64bit boxes, or is the IP address assigned by 
> DHCP.
> 
> Ah, you already stated
> 
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.160
> 
> for the 32bit box. 

Incidentally, I've only quite recently got around to configuring the IP 
settings on my 32bit box. Before I had just left things as default, and 
it did seem to be using DHCP by default, (as it was using 192.168.1.3, 
which was the next available address at the time). I discovered the 
networking problem while it was set up as default, using DHCP.

Interestingly the network configuration file didn't have anything in it 
except for the loopback settings. So presumably the system must have 
been getting the default DHCP setup from somewhere else.


> 
> The IP address for the 64bit box is set to what?

192.168.1.202

> 
>> The problem does seem to be associated to something on my server (my
>> 64bit Linux box). I tried entering "ping pop3.tiscali.co.uk" on my 32
>> bit machine, and at first it didn't work. Then I unplugged the network
>> cable from my server and the ping immediately started working.
>> Reconnecting the my server network cable, the ping was still working.
>> Presumably whatever the problem is, it is takes a bit of time to
>> manifest it's self.
> 
> Well you have indicated you are using NetworkManager on the 32bit box.

Ermm...Pass...
I have not found any utility called network manager on the 32bit box. If 
it exists, I haven't found it yet. The graphical interface is rather 
basic, and there are very few settings available. For this reason I have 
been wondering whether it may be worth reinstalling everything from 
scratch and using the Gnome desktop, but perhaps 1st I should try to 
persevere with what I've got.

When I Initially installed the OS, I left all the networking as it was 
by default. When I discovered that I couldn't access the internet, I did 
look for network settings in the graphical desktop, and couldn't find 
any. So I just opened up a terminal window, and edited the network 
configuration files using the vi text editor.

> My experience is that if you have assigned a static address in the
> interfaces file, then there is no need for NetworkManager (dpkg --purge)
> because NetworkManager will mess up your network connection and anyways
> if you have a static IP address, you do not need Network manager.

Fair enough. But how do I find out whether I actually have Network 
Manager, and if so how do I get rid of it? Do I need to get rid of it?

> 
> I am wondering if NetworkManager is getting an IP address by DHCP
> and overriding your static IP address, and that this is causing the
> network problem.
> 
> Have you correctly setup your router to only assign DHCP to a
> particular range of IP addreses and that the static IP address
> you have assigned to box 32bit (and perhaps 64 bit) are outside
> this range?

I've set up my router to use addresses 1-50 for DHCP assignments. I 
thought 50 was ample. Only my laptop and my printer are setup to use 
DHCP. (My printer doesn't seem to work if I use a static address, buggy 
drivers I think).

I started at address 100 for my Squeezeboxes, currently I have 4 using 
100-103.

I started at address 200 for server devices, and I've stopped using the 
2 that used 200 and 201. My 64bit linux box was the next server I set 
up, so I used 202.

I started at 250 for network routers. I have a second router connected 
that I'm now only using as a network switch, it's an old Linksys cable 
router. OMG.. Doah, Just found out that that one is also set to address 
251. Now that would explain the problem, and I'm not sure why I haven't 
had any problems before. Right I've just changed it it 250, hopefully 
that should fix the problem.

I set my 32 bit box to 160 because at the time I couldn't remember 
whether my Squeezeboxes where starting a 100 or 150.

> 
> Also it is not good practice to make your local machines members
> of the tiscali.co.uk domain because there are no DNS records for
> these machines and you are claiming something which is not true,
> so you should remove the domain and search entries from resolv.conf.

OK. I found that setting on my 64bit Box, I don't know how it got there 
but assumed one of the setup programs must have put it there for a 
reason. This is one of the few things about IP settings that I don't 
quite understand. I assumed it must be correct, and copied it to my 
32bit box. Perhaps I'll try commenting it out and then see if everything 
still works properly.

Richard.

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-03 00:36 +0100
  Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2011-05-03 03:17 +0000
  Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-05-03 14:57 +0100
  Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-03 15:25 +0000
    Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 15:13 +0100
      Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Michal Jaegermann <michal@gortel.phys.ualberta.ca> - 2011-05-06 09:26 +0000
        Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 15:12 +0100
    Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 15:21 +0100
      Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-05-05 16:36 +0100
        Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 17:41 +0100
          Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-05-05 17:50 +0100
            Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 18:04 +0100
            Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 18:17 +0100
          Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-05 21:37 +0000
            Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 00:53 +0100
              Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-06 00:19 +0000
                Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 02:59 +0100
                Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-06 16:22 +0000
                Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 18:38 +0100
                A couple of corections. Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 20:02 +0100
                Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Michal Jaegermann <michal@gortel.phys.ualberta.ca> - 2011-05-08 22:12 +0000
              Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2011-05-05 20:39 -0400
                Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 03:05 +0100
    Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 15:24 +0100
    Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 16:08 +0100
      Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 16:30 +0100
        Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 16:55 +0100
  Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 14:59 +0100
    Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-05 15:39 +0000
      Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 17:51 +0100
        Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-05 21:43 +0000
          Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 00:58 +0100
            Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-05-06 00:24 +0000
              Re: Network configuration problem Mythbuntu 10.10 Richard Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> - 2011-05-06 01:51 +0100

csiph-web