Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31514

Re: Return of the Applets?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Return of the Applets?
Date Mon, 6 Apr 2015 21:36:27 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 32
Message-ID <mfvfpl$cf4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <Applets-20150405060326@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mfreaj$g7$1@dont-email.me> <JavaScript-20150405191824@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mfs1gc$83b$1@dont-email.me> <mfufc2$r3q$1@dont-email.me> <mfuljg$l3a$1@dont-email.me> <mfuu0u$nqj$1@dont-email.me> <mfuums$q9u$1@dont-email.me> <mfv3n9$f8q$1@dont-email.me> <mfv6re$o39$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Tue, 7 Apr 2015 02:35:33 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8cedddb29338592f734c41b16a68fadc"; logging-data="12772"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/hjiI7VHRx4rpbIO4XiDY2oeluW8BfVj0="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0
in-reply-to <mfv6re$o39$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock sha1:YuIk8rWbFg8bwa1L+A7LN0WhCfw=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31514

Show key headers only | View raw


On 4/6/2015 7:03 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> What you don't understand it - while every languages has advantages in
> some areas, every language also has disadvantages in some areas.  The
> two have a tendency to average out over the course of a large number of
> programs.

If you were to claim that the plurality of existing software were coded 
in COBOL by some reasonable metric (including LOC), I would be skeptical 
of that claim without references, but I would not find it unbelievable 
(I personally think that threshold was crossed by Java, C#, C, or C++ 
sometime in the last in 15 years, but I have no evidence to back it up). 
Certainly, I won't dispute that a large body of extant COBOL code exists.

The claim I've objected to is not that COBOL is present in extant code, 
but rather that COBOL is the most-used language in terms of new code 
being added each year. I don't have any hard evidence of that, but there 
is circumstantial evidence to support it: other languages being more 
prevalent in academic curricula, more job advertisements, more resources 
being available, the fact that even major COBOL-users mostly limit their 
use of COBOL to maintenance of existing applications and use newer 
languages for new middleware/backend applications, etc.

> Which still does not say that spreadsheets are programming languages.
> And it's impossible to provide references to something which is not true.

It refers specifically to "The number of end-users who write spreadsheet 
programs"--if spreadsheets are programs, then what are the formulas in 
them if not code written in a spreadsheet programming language?

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not 
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 09:46 -0400
  Re: Return of the Applets? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-05 13:12 -0400
  Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 15:14 -0400
    Re: Return of the Applets? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 16:41 -0400
      Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 16:54 -0400
        Re: Return of the Applets? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 17:08 -0400
          Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 17:17 -0400
            Re: Return of the Applets? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 17:30 -0400
              Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 17:42 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 17:52 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 18:17 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2015-04-06 11:26 +0200
    Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 13:23 -0500
      Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 15:09 -0400
        Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 17:33 -0500
          Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 17:44 -0400
            Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 19:10 -0500
              Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 20:03 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 21:36 -0500
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 09:11 -0400
            Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-06 23:25 +0000
              Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 19:59 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 13:29 +0000
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 10:45 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 15:51 +0000
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 13:16 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 20:22 +0000
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 17:03 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2015-04-07 11:34 -0500
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 13:18 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2015-04-07 12:40 -0500
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 17:06 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 20:28 +0000
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 17:11 -0400
                Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 23:00 +0000
                Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 19:25 -0400
  Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 13:09 -0500

csiph-web