Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31480
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Return of the Applets? |
| Date | 2015-04-05 17:42 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mfsa6l$7mm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <55219dfc$0$280$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <mfs7d7$u5p$1@dont-email.me> <5521a43d$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <mfs8nl$3bh$1@dont-email.me> <5521a992$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On 4/5/2015 5:30 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 4/5/2015 5:17 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >> On 4/5/2015 5:08 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> On 4/5/2015 4:54 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>> On 4/5/2015 4:41 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>>>> On 4/5/2015 3:14 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: >>>>>> On 4/5/2015 1:31 PM, Stefan Ram wrote: >>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> writes: >>>>>>>> You're mixing apples and oranges. Java is NOT JavaScript - or vice >>>>>>>> versa. They are two different languages with two different >>>>>>>> purposes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That must be some kind of reflex some people can't control! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But no one has claimed that Java was JavaScript. Relax. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, but you are comparing them - which is like comparing apples and >>>>>> oranges. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> >>>>> They were compared as languages for running code in browser. >>>>> >>>>> A perfectly valid comparison. >>>>> >>>> >>>> But Java does not "run in the browser". It runs in an extension, >>>> loaded >>>> by the browser. >>>> >>>> As opposed to JavaScript - which runs natively in most browsers. >>>> >>>> A very important distinction. >>> >>> A relevant distinction in some contexts. >>> >>> But not relevant in this context. >>> >>> The discussion was about access to screen and the ability to support >>> RWS. >>> >> >> 100% relevant in this conversation - but since it contradicts your >> argument, you have to claim it's unimportant. > > So how does the the fact that JavaScript comes from the browser vendor > while the Java plugin comes from Oracle impact the Stefan's conclusion > about support for RWD and what it means for Java? > >>>>> Just like comparing apples and oranges is a perfectly valid comparsion >>>>> when discussing what fruits you think taste the best. >>>>> >>>>> None of which explains why you brought the Java != JavaScript >>>>> discussion >>>>> into the picture. >>>> >>>> It does when you're comparing two entirely different languages with >>>> different goals and different implementations. >>> >>> So if someone is comparing C++ and objective-C in a specific context >>> then you also want to point out that it is two different languages?? >>> >>> I would not. >>> >>> Neither for those two or for Java and JavaScript. >> >> Yes they are. > > Did you read the question? > Yes, I read the question. Did YOU? Or, more importantly - are you capable of UNDERSTANDING the claims? It doesn't look like it. >>>>>>>> The ONLY thing they have in common are the letters "J", "v" and two >>>>>>>> "a"s. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But since you insist, let me give you some factual information. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Both are trademarks of Oracle. >>>>>> >>>>>> So? >>>>> >>>>> It proves that your claim: >>>>> >>>>> #The ONLY thing they have in common are the letters "J", "v" and two >>>>> "a"s. >>>>> >>>>> is wrong. >>>> >>>> So I guess you're just being a pedantic troll than, Arne. >>> >>> Since when has it been considered trolling to point out that >>> claims made are flat out wrong?? >> >> When you split hairs to contradict a bigger point. It's a mark of a >> pedantic troll. > > You started a completely irrelevant sub-thread. And it is splitting > hairs to point out that besides irrelevant then it was also wrong. > > :-) > > Arne > Nope, it was completely relevant to the subject at hand. But you don't understand that. But then another indicator of a pedantic troll is selectively snipping information which contradicts what her has to say. Like you did (again) here. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 09:46 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-05 13:12 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 15:14 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 16:41 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 16:54 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 17:08 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 17:17 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 17:30 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 17:42 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-04-05 17:52 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-05 18:17 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2015-04-06 11:26 +0200
Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 13:23 -0500
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 15:09 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 17:33 -0500
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 17:44 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 19:10 -0500
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 20:03 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 21:36 -0500
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 09:11 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-06 23:25 +0000
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-06 19:59 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 13:29 +0000
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 10:45 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 15:51 +0000
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 13:16 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 20:22 +0000
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 17:03 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2015-04-07 11:34 -0500
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 13:18 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2015-04-07 12:40 -0500
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 17:06 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 20:28 +0000
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 17:11 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-07 23:00 +0000
Re: Return of the Applets? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-04-07 19:25 -0400
Re: Return of the Applets? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-04-06 13:09 -0500
csiph-web