Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.os.development > #9224

Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm>
Newsgroups alt.os.development
Subject Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI
Date Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:15:01 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 319
Message-ID <20160228201501.0729fe48@_> (permalink)
References <mulmv6$1hv$1@dont-email.me> <op.x5wde9jfyfako5@localhost> <murgth$uhm$1@dont-email.me> <op.x50ebanoyfako5@localhost> <mutvnl$9h9$2@dont-email.me> <op.x52adnz7yfako5@localhost> <n5om2t$cuc$1@dont-email.me> <op.yablj4i6yfako5@localhost> <n6b2r2$jj9$1@dont-email.me> <20160103145555.0eb69be5@_> <n7al82$rvl$1@dont-email.me> <20160116032912.69a7cd08@_> <n9pir2$ah1$1@dont-email.me> <20160214091143.3e442dbb@_> <n9q821$ls3$1@dont-email.me> <20160215055546.61c0b1ed@_> <e658bdec-131f-44f6-a292-797cfde9dd5b@googlegroups.com> <20160217042119.2e06ff38@_> <e1097b8d-ec6f-4231-b495-fe0619f90f47@googlegroups.com> <20160224180348.6d311595@_> <79a6efdd-1220-4d31-8fc2-60e7b3dc8197@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
X-Newsreader Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com alt.os.development:9224

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 02:53:17 -0800 (PST)
"Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 3:03:25 PM UTC-8, Rod Pemberton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:12:55 -0800 (PST)
> > "Alexei A. Frounze" <...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 1:20:56 AM UTC-8, Rod Pemberton
> > > wrote:  
> > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 03:56:36 -0800 (PST)
> > > > "Alexei A. Frounze" <...@gmail.com> wrote:  
> > > > > On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 2:55:25 AM UTC-8, Rod
> > > > > Pemberton wrote:    

[...]

> I'm not sure your words should be taken as medical advice. :)
> There probably are better ways to deal with certain things
> than electroshock, lobotomy, etc. Like I said, one would
> need a doc to figure out what's going on and what can be
> done.

A high school acquaintance of mine was suicidal.
They treated him with electroshock but only after
nothing else worked to eliminate his tendencies.
I.e., medication failed, psychology failed, ...

> > Of course, I don't recommend anyone take drugs illicit
> > or prescribed that affect the human mind.  However, they
> > do help some people.  
> 
> Apparently, experiences change the brain too. :)
> 

Yes, you can watch other people do stupid, daredevil stuff
on Youtube, and be just as thrilled without the danger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ_IQS3VKjA#t=3m40s

In just a few years, stuff like that will be filmed in
3D and delivered via VR ...  Just imagine a movie theater
without any screens, but a whole bunch of people wearing
headsets.

> > Is someone like that going to go to medical care for
> > a required yearly mental evaluation?  No.  
> 
> Someone like who/what? Required why? What's your point?
> 

It was in regards to now snipped content:

> > If someone is in such a state, do they even recognize the
> > importance of them not being there?  I.e., it implies that
> > people need a yearly mental health evaluation.  I doubt
> > that anyone would sign up for that.  It implies that you
> > know there is something wrong with you which needs fixing.
> > This would have to be forced upon people.

The guy you cited likely wouldn't be helped by the medical
community unless 1) he was forced to have a medical evaluation
yearly and determined to be in need of help or 2) he eventually
self-admitted himself to a hospital or psychologist.

> (And the say, btw, soon the US
> will be a minority majority

The predominant race of the majority in the U.S. might switch,
or change or "merge," yes.  Scientists think we'll all look
like people in South America in due time.  And, some scientists
are claiming that genetically modifying humans, with chlorophyll,
will solve the world's presumed future food shortage.  So, we'll
be green looking too ...  ;-)

> minority majority (did I get the word order right? > )).

Probably not ...  Scientists have claimed that for generations.
I.e., blacks will overtake whites in America.  Now, they're
saying it won't be blacks, but it'll be Hispanics, except many
of them are voluntarily returning to Central and South America,
or are being permanently deported.  Time will tell.

> What I was saying is that people don't
> always share their problems (real physical pains included) and
> miss out on help and then when they do share they sometimes get
> put down instead of getting help.

Yes, so that guy you cited, really needed to be forced to get
help, correct?  ;-)

> Putting aside what truth is, if you had a problem and you
> knew it could be solved or alleviated, wouldn't you want that?

That depends on the side-effects of the solution.

If the solution is to amputate an arm to eliminate
incurable elbow pain, I might think twice about a cure.

If I'm a successful author and playwright, but only
while I'm drunk, I might think twice about a cure.

If I'm a rich, abusive asshole and the solution to my
deep seated fears is to be hypnotized into being a
polite and upstanding citizen, I might think twice.

If the solution is lobotomy or electroshock, then
the symptoms must be considered to be substantially
worse, e.g., death.

> People like that man from the video don't know what they don't
> know for a long time. They wish their problems gone, but they
> don't know what the problems really are and what can be done
> about them. They don't want to embrace their suffering or
> their negative impact on the people around them (e.g. like
> that man not showing up for work for days).

How would he find out in a timely manner without someone
forcing him to take a yearly mental examination?

> > I think there are a handful of problems affecting the rights
> > or equality of homosexuals.  First, most religions indoctrinate
> > people that homosexuality is a sin, essentially a religious
> > crime, and much of the world is either Christian or Muslim.
> > Second, much common law is based upon religious beliefs.  Third,
> > some governments are based entirely on religious beliefs,
> > especially the Ten Commandments.  Fourth, continued victimization
> > of children by pedophilic priests in established churches
> > ensures that homosexuality continues to be demonized by major
> > religions.  Fifth, countries like the U.S. and Russia see
> > marriage as a long-standing institution between men and women,
> > and should not be allowed same sex couples.  Sixth, in the U.S.,
> > applying equal equality laws can weaken the rights of the
> > government to outlaw and punish other undesirable human behaviors,
> > such as murder, rape, incest, pedophilia, etc.  Seventh, in free
> > and democratic countries, majority rule is the norm, and not
> > demands by the minority, e.g., by homosexuals, even if based
> > on laws of equality.  
> 
> What's your point?

You brought up acceptance and non-acceptance of homosexuals with:

> Does your congregation still thinks gays are bad
> or need to be "cured" or deserve hate, beating, death?

I was describing what I see as problems interfering with
their widespread acceptance in the U.S.

> > > Or does it only think gays are smaller persons than anyone
> > > else and maybe that it's OK to belittle and ridicule them
> > > or teach them how to live their gay lives? Or is that one
> > > that's a bit more progressive in the question and appears
> > > in the list here?:
> > > [link]
> > > It's just one example, where we as society still aren't
> > > doing well.  
> > 
> > Ironic?  You're from what country again?  Wasn't it Russia?
> > IIRC, you attended a Moscow university.   
> 
> And your point is?

You cited society, i.e., U.S. society, not doing well in regards
to gays (and lesbians), but you're from a society (Russia) which
is doing worse in that regard.  Don't you find that to be ironic?
I do.

> > What do you think about
> > Russia discriminating against homosexuals by outlawing their
> > behavior? ...  Is Russia the future or the past in this
> > regard? ...  
> 
> And your point is?

I was asking your opinion in regards to Russia, since you
seem supportive of gays (and lesbians) in U.S. society.
Do you not also support gays (and lesbians) in Russian society?
If not, why the bias?

> Some scholars put the sin of homosexuality into the context

"sin of homosexuality"

What's that?  And, what's sin? ...

AIR, the Bible doesn't say homosexuality is a sin.
Church leaders do.

In fact, the bible says that only Jewish, male, virgins
make it into Heaven, which would imply that God is
either a male pederast, or possibly a female pedophile.
Neither of these is acceptable to any church, for
different reasons, i.e., a homosexual God or a female
God are both unacceptable.  That's if the Bible is
true, as most Christians and Muslims believe it is:

Revelation 7:4  (144K Jewish children)
Revelation 14:1 (144K who stand with Christ)
Revelation 14:3 (144K sing a song)
Revelation 14:4 (144K male Virgins)

> Some scholars put the sin of homosexuality into the context
> of a people struggling for freedom from oppression and
> persecution,

I would not classify racism or homosexuality as a form
of oppression and persecution.  By comparison, they're
nowhere near as extreme.  I would classify slavery as
oppression and persecution, which was a long-standing
practice in Africa, not initiated by white men.

> IOW, it not being sinful per se but being a
> waste when every person counts and the count needs to be
> bigger to gain strength.

...
 
> Why would you need more people in the US or Russia now?

Russia is mostly empty.  Large parts of the U.S. is too,
but not like Russia.  Russia could easily form three or
four countries, without much economic effect in Moscow.
Military issues might be a different matter.  Some things
may be badly located.

> For another world domination war? Number-wise we both
> lose to China.

Salvation through technology or partnership? ...
I doubt that either government would consider the
latter, unless forced by China.

> > > It's not necessarily just the demand from future employees.
> > > The world is entering post-industrial economy and the society
> > > needs to follow. Good jobs are increasingly more intellectual
> > > and less unskilled or physically laborious.  
> > 
> > I disagree.  The need is still there.  The jobs have just
> > shifted to countries with lower labor costs.  I.e., such
> > jobs are building the middle-class in Mexico and China, and
> > soon, India and Africa, but this won't go on forever.  
> 
> With what exactly do you disagree as I don't disagree with
> your statements on the shift and forever?

1) You classified the entire world as entering
post-industrial economy, not just the developed world.

2) You said good jobs are increasingly more intellectual
and less unskilled or physically laborious, which is
true in the developed world, but not so in underdeveloped
regions.

> Or are you suggesting that those Americans who have trouble
> getting a job in the US should simply move to other countries,
> e.g. the aforementioned Mexico, China, India and African
> countries? Btw, some do, but I think most won't ever.

Some jobs are returning, but most of them never will.
It's too late to turn back the clock.  The jobs were
exported.  They're not being replaced.  This goes toward
the demand for a college degree by the less-than-qualified.

> But I'm still not holding breath for strong
> AI or however-else-qualified AI.

What?  Even given the negative outcome, it's worth a fortune
to governments and businesses.  Imagine what the U.S., Russia,
China, or Iran would pay for a machine with the mind of
100,000 geniuses.

> > > That's an important aspect as well. And if you think about it,
> > > the particular combination of the two probably only furthers
> > > the inequality divide.  
> > 
> > As I've indicated above, I don't think there will be an inequality
> > divide going forward.  I foresee everyone not having any type of
> > work in the future.  There will be people with small sums of money
> > which will quickly deplete, and those with larger sums that will
> > deplete more slowly.  Those with larger sums, including world
> > governments, simply cannot afford to provide for everyone forever.
> > If all the wealth of the billionaires in the world is confiscated,
> > it will only provide 10% of one year's worth of the global wealth
> > product, or world's global domestic product.  How does the world
> > survive without capitalism? ...  
> 
> How does the world survive with capitalism? :)

It builds and produces everything.  Men would not do what is
required without money or being forced or conned.

> I mean, what features of it in particular are key for survival?

By survival, I'll take it you mean modern survival
and not subsistence farming, hunting, and harvesting.
None of those, in conjunction, will support the current
world populace.

So, monetary exchange.

How do you obtain a can of corn without money involved
in the transaction?  Steal? Barter? Work?  These are all
inefficient in terms of both time and money.  How does
a great poet have time to write, painter to paint, etc
if he must spend all day in the fields to survive?

> And are they unique to it?

Yes, efficiency is.  At least, efficiency is provided by
capitalism in terms of properly allocated capital, most
of the time.  You can never eliminate overzealous people.

> So why is the "middle class" smaller now?

More people in poverty.  More people on government support.


Rod Pemberton

Back to alt.os.development | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 11:42 +0100
  Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2015-10-02 20:43 +0200
    Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 15:23 +0100
      Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2015-10-05 17:38 +0200
  Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-02 17:17 -0400
    Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 16:36 +0100
      Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-04 21:27 -0400
        Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 15:01 +0100
          Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-05 21:57 -0400
            Re: halting Adobe Flash videos with Mozilla Firefox, was [Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI] "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-26 04:35 -0400
            Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:40 +0000
              Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 15:51 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 12:08 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-03 14:55 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 17:58 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 11:32 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-16 03:29 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 13:44 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-16 12:55 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 19:55 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 07:39 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 22:45 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-19 22:28 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 13:27 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-27 17:20 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:03 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 17:43 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-23 13:17 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 13:42 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 09:14 +0100
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 09:56 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-14 09:11 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:58 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-15 05:55 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 15:57 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-16 05:33 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 06:16 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-24 18:03 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 06:25 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 00:21 -0800
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 08:45 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-28 20:40 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 14:49 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-03-02 21:50 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:09 +0000
                OT politics was Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-05 12:40 +0000
                Re: OT politics was Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-03-05 20:11 -0500
                Re: OT politics, was [Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-03-05 20:11 -0500
                Re: OT politics, was [Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI] James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:35 +0000
                Re: OT politics, was [Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-03-17 21:02 -0400
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-24 20:09 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 14:55 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 03:56 -0800
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-17 04:21 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 02:12 -0800
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-24 18:03 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 02:53 -0800
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-02-28 20:15 -0500
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 20:37 -0700
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-03-28 18:23 -0400
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 21:10 -0700
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 14:34 +0000
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 15:10 +0000
        Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 15:39 +0100
  Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2015-10-03 12:48 +0200
    Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 17:00 +0100
      Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2015-10-04 23:32 +0200
        Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 14:05 +0100
          Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 15:17 +0100
            Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2015-10-06 10:35 +0200
              Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 16:28 +0100
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2015-10-06 19:14 +0200
                Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 20:02 +0100
          Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2015-10-06 10:46 +0200
            Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-07 01:16 -0400
            Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:50 +0000
              Re: Flow of keystroke messages in a UI "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2015-12-27 23:22 +0100

csiph-web