Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75967
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Nuclear plants. |
| Date | 2025-10-12 01:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ml0de0Fgfc9U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (22 earlier) <10c5497$1er0a$1@dont-email.me> <10c5dtj$1gn95$2@dont-email.me> <10c66un$1ojat$1@dont-email.me> <10c85o8$2kf2m$1@dont-email.me> <10cehjr$12df6$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 21:18:51 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 08/10/2025 18:27, Chris wrote: >>>> It is the disjunct between 'regulatory limits' and actual 'danger to >>>> health' that so pisses me off. >>> One is informed by the other, >> >> The problem is, that actually, it wasn't. >> >> Not when there is literally no data on which to base any sort of >> regulation, but there is a real perceived need for one. >> >> At the time regulations were framed we knew... >> >> 1. How much radiation it took to kill a person outright within days >> from radiation poisoning. >> >> 2. That regular exposure to *high* but not lethal doses of radiation >> caused cancer. The radium girls painting dials with radium and licking >> their paintbrushes. Marie Curie. >> >> And that was *all* we knew. >> >> Out of that the LNR myth was born. That the chances of developing >> cancer were a *simple* product of the dose, times the time you were >> exposed to it. >> >> And the regulations were then framed on that assumption and on the >> basis that any cancers so arising would be lost in the noise of all >> other causes. >> >> Even though at the time it was ell known that parts of Britain were >> subject to natural radiation that prohibited people being employed in >> any nuclear industry there due to the high cumulative doses they >> received. And yet there were no apparent excess cancer rates there. >> >> The regulations were framed politically, informed by politics and the >> deliberately induced climate of fear of the Cold War. >> >> They had almost nothing to do with facts data or science. >> >> >> > but it does come down to risk appetite when >>> deciding what the actual limit is. When faced with the question >>> people's appetite is generally very low and the assumed optimum is >>> zero deaths/injuries. >> >> Except when it comes to *every other human activity*. >> >> >>> Unless you're a NASA Astronaut/scientist. They objectively know the >>> real risk and have parametrised their limits of acceptability. For >>> example, they knew the shuttle programme would result in deaths and it >>> was cancelled because the failure rate was unacceptably high. >> >> We haven't cancelled : > > Nuclear hasn't been cancelled either. We are literally building new ones > in the UK. > >> Horse riding Climbing mountains Swimming Driving cars Riding bicycles >> Coal power stations Wind farms Solar panels Lying in the sun Drinking >> alcohol Flying. >> >> All of which are demonstrably far far greater risks than nuclear power. > Other than power stations or wind farms the comparison is a non > sequitur. They're all voluntary and down to personal choice. apropos: theregister.com/2025/10/10/datacenter_coal_power/ "Climate goals go up in smoke as US datacenters turn to coal High gas prices and surging AI demand send operators back to the dirtiest fuel in the stack" No problem, we've got you covered OpenAI. https://www.montanacoalcouncil.org/reserves
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Nuclear plants. Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2025-10-03 08:59 +1000
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-03 14:20 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2025-10-04 15:12 +1000
Re: Nuclear plants. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-04 02:01 -0400
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-04 08:02 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-05 21:41 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-05 21:47 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-05 21:08 -0400
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-06 13:37 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-06 13:45 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-07 10:28 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 10:35 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-07 11:15 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 11:37 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-09 00:00 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 14:24 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 12:34 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-09 11:29 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 13:10 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-10 23:43 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-08 23:52 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 13:56 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-05 20:57 -0700
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-06 08:52 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-06 05:00 -0400
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-06 10:51 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-07 11:07 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-06 21:49 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-06 13:42 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-06 15:08 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-06 22:24 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Harold Stevens <wookie@aspen.localdomain> - 2025-10-06 15:56 -0500
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 09:31 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-07 10:46 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 11:28 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-07 13:05 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-07 12:35 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-07 12:40 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 13:55 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-07 13:01 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 09:28 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-07 15:39 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-07 15:44 -0400
Re: Nuclear plants. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-07 19:57 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 09:29 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 12:33 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-09 19:55 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 10:06 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:34 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 14:03 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-10 12:24 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 14:04 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:33 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-11 11:22 +0000
Genocide "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 14:46 +0200
Genocide and terrorism Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-10-13 05:14 +0200
Re: Genocide c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-13 03:04 -0400
Re: Genocide The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 10:32 +0100
Re: Genocide "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:06 +0200
Re: Genocide The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:23 +0100
Re: Genocide "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:50 +0200
Re: Genocide The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:34 +0100
Re: Genocide "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-14 09:51 +0200
Re: Genocide Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 17:45 +0100
Re: Genocide "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 19:25 +0200
Re: Genocide "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:05 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-12 20:41 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:29 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-12 21:24 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 05:25 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 06:33 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 10:23 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 18:59 +0000
israel/Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:18 +0200
Re: israel/Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:29 +0100
israel/Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:15 +0200
Re: israel/Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:29 +0100
Re: israel/Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-13 18:51 +0000
Re: israel/Palestine Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 19:12 +0000
Re: israel/Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 21:26 +0200
Re: israel/Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-14 10:09 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-10-13 02:47 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 05:28 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-13 12:47 +0100
OT: Israel and Palestine (was: Re: Nuclear plants.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 18:31 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 19:05 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-13 18:49 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-14 10:06 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 19:17 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-14 10:10 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-18 23:37 +1100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Steve Witkoff <Steve.Witkoff@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-18 13:32 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 19:47 +0200
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-18 19:11 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-14 00:26 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-14 11:24 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-14 13:08 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-14 18:12 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Harold Stevens <wookie@aspen.localdomain> - 2025-10-14 15:08 -0500
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-15 12:04 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-18 23:59 +1100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-18 17:39 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-18 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 22:47 +0200
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-18 22:17 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-19 02:08 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:26 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:48 +0200
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:25 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-19 23:35 +1100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 19:51 +0200
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-18 19:20 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:23 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-19 23:48 +1100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-19 19:36 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-20 10:14 +0100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-20 23:40 +1100
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 19:10 +0000
Re: OT: Israel and Palestine Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-21 11:06 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 12:20 +0200
Re: Nuclear plants. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-10 09:01 -0700
OT: IDF treatment of detainees (was: Re: Nuclear plants.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-21 10:57 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-10 19:56 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-10-10 02:35 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-08 07:32 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 09:27 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 09:25 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-08 07:36 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 11:20 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-08 17:27 +0000
OT: STS risks awareness in NASA (was: Re: Nuclear plants.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 11:14 +0100
Re: OT: STS risks awareness in NASA (was: Re: Nuclear plants.) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-09 19:55 +0000
Re: OT: STS risks awareness in NASA c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-10 02:23 -0400
Re: OT: STS risks awareness in NASA The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-10 10:14 +0100
Re: OT: STS risks awareness in NASA rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-10 19:53 +0000
Re: OT: STS risks awareness in NASA Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-09 12:19 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-10-11 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 01:09 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-12 00:05 -0400
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-12 11:19 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-12 21:49 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-12 12:48 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 18:36 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:40 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:35 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:33 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 18:30 +0000
Re: Nuclear plants. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-09 00:04 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-08 14:31 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2025-10-09 11:04 +1100
Re: Nuclear plants. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-04 08:01 +0100
Re: Nuclear plants. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-04 04:59 -0400
csiph-web