Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #73949
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour |
| Date | 2026-04-27 14:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.3oe62lvdbyq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <69ebecb7@news.ausics.net> <op.3oa5ekoebyq249@pvr2.lan> <69ed3818@news.ausics.net> <op.3ocxkmz4byq249@pvr2.lan> <69ee9c49@news.ausics.net> |
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding, no intelligence, no context, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sense of anything. They are glorified >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pachinko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the output - the ball - tumbling down the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the pins based on nothing but chance and which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just did this one, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That result is nothing even remotely like what you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You just ignored that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What, that you can't Google? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can and do google >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would get from a glorified pachinko machine >>>>>>>>>>>> There you go, ignoring that again >>>>>>>>>>> Yep. >>>>>>>>>> Because even you realise that you can never >>>>>>>>>> bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity >>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>> Yep >>>>>>> Glad you agree. >>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying >>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get this page from a brewery by searching for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "handles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in your AI answer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The grok response accurately points out that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the volume varys with the location, fuckwit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But inaccurately states the volume only varies between >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in range of 425-450mL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and always matches a schooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't say that either >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It says it over and over from the start: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer in Australian slang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "A "handle" is a common term for a schooner" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state. >>>>>>>>>> Even you realise that you can never >>>>>>>>>> bullshit your way out of that stupid lie >>>>>>>>> Umm, That was your AI's lie. >>>>>>>> You haven't shown that it is a lie >>>>>>> Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your >>>>>>> Artificial Idiots. >>>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag >>>>>>>>> But I'm glad you finally agree it was telling you BS. >>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage >>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit. >>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying >>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like the USSD definition, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no USSD definition >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply to the part after the "--". >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NT: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is >>>>>>>>>>> 285ml in the NT like I quoted before. >>>>>>>>>> Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before >>>>>>>>> Your AI didn't know that. >>>>>>>> Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island >>>>>>> But you didn't, to it. >>>>>> Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself >>>>>>>>>>> It also says this which would >>>>>>>>>>> suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner >>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere in Aus: >>>>>>>>>>> "By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty >>>>>>>>>>> universally >>>>>>>>>>> understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller >>>>>>>>>>> options >>>>>>>>>>> often having a name unique to the region." >>>>>>>>>> That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist >>>>>>>>> Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as >>>>>>>>> handle. >>>>>>>> It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse >>>>>>>> for a >>>>>>>> bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a >>>>>>>> handle >>>>>>> It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may >>>>>>> come with a handle", >>>>>> Not with that particular volume they don't >>>>>>> but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer glases with handles >>>>>>> before anyway. >>>>>> Not with that particular volume they don't >>>>>>> It's hillarious how wrong you are, >>>>>> We'll see... >>>>>>> here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side! >>>>>>> https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914 >>>>>> Pity that says VINTAGE. >>>>> Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense. >>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag >>>>> That's just too cute to dispute. >>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag >>>>>>>>>>>> And neither does anything else that google turns up >>>>>>>>>> Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid >>>>>>>>>> claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Northern Territory's beer sizes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question to the AI never mentioned any location. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did accurately work out where I was getting that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article was what prompted your question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did work that out. So much for your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it does with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He says while snipping where it said that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A "handle" is a common term for a schooner -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And replacing it with where talked about something else. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it talked about something else >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for the NT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No cites except the very ABC article that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have got the info from. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the SOURCES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> More of your barefaced lies on the random >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which it probably paid attention to instead of better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results like the brewery I found. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it did and it basically said the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT, >>>>>>>>>>>> Which isnt where we are discussing, >>>>>>>>>>>> so is a completely useless result >>>>>>>>>>>>> and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other >>>>>>>>>>>>> sates. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway >>>>>>>>>>>> Corse it did when it named that explicitly >>>>>>>>>>>>> so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there. >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit >>>>>>>>>>>> artist >>>>>>>>>>> It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong. >>>>>>>>>> It didnt get where the term handle was used >>>>>>>>>> wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>>>>>> Did so too. >>>>>>>> How odd that you can't prove that >>>>>>> Did so too. >>>>>> Bullshit you ever did >>>>>>>>>> And you haven't extablished that the term >>>>>>>>>> handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either >>>>>>>>> Did so too. >>>>>>>> How odd that you can't prove that >>>>>>> Did so too. >>>>>> Bullshit you ever did >>>>>>>>>>>>> You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your >>>>>>>>>>>>> question: >>>>>>>>>>>> It clearly did >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466 >>>>>>>>>>>>> So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and >>>>>>>>>>>>> found >>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article >>>>>>>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>> Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume." >>>>>>>>>>>> Just because that fuckwit got that wrong... >>>>>>>>>>>> No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle >>>>>>>>>> Have fun listing anywhere that does >>>>>>>>> Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course! >>>>>>>> You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>>>> The coroner knows it. >>>>>> Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that >>>>> So if you only believe AI BS, >>>> There is no bullshit, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>> why believe anything else they claim? >>>> Because I haven't seen AI get anything wrong >>> It was the coroner claiming that, same as everything else in the >>> article you read. >> Duh, but even google can't find any substantiation of that claim >>>>>>>>>>>>> So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the >>>>>>>>>>>>> exact article that prompted your question! >>>>>>>>>>>> More of your mindless bullshit >>>>>>>>>>>>> Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L! >>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong, as always >>>>>>>>>>>>> An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the >>>>>>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted >>>>>>>>>>>>> your question, instead of that useless AI BS. >>>>>>>>>>>> The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong >>>>>>>>>>>> No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle >>>>>>>>>>> Hillarious! >>>>>>>>>> Pathetic!! >>>>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit. >>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage >>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit. >>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying >>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>> You had to ask what a handle of beer is, >>>>>>>>>> Because I had never heard that term >>>>>>>>>> used before for a measure of beer. >>>>>>>>>> The only thing that comes even close is >>>>>>>>>> a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I >>>>>>>>>> have heard plenty of times before >>>>>>>>> So obviously the brewery >>>>>>>> The brewery says nothing of the sort >>>>>>>> you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>>>> You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point. >>>>>> It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>>>>>> and coroner know more than you, >>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage >>>>>>>>> and as usual the AI doesn't know anything. >>>>>>>> Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist >>>>>>>>>>> but now you're denying what a brewery, >>>>>>>>>> It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island >>>>>>>>>>> and the coroner who first used the phrase, >>>>>>>>>> And got it wrong and even google proves that >>>>>>>>> They used the phrase and defined it, >>>>>>>> With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct >>>>>>>>> nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else. >>>>>>>> But not a shred of evidence that they got it right >>>>>>> Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead >>>>>>> of 285ml like they said? >>>>>> Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit >>>>> The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they >>>>> said that. >>>> That wasnt about what the coroner meant, >>>> its what the TAVERN meant when they told >>>> the coroner how much he had drank >>> They clearly said he drank 18 285ml "handles". >> They never said what the volume of the handles is > So are you the psychic who knows what the coroner was told by the > tavern and what they decided to make up out of thin air, or do you > think you've found a psychic AI? Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something > Either way any sane person would > see that your Artificial Idiot was obviously just plain wrong about > 425-450ml. How odd that google doesnt show that >>>>>>>>>>> both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't >>>>>>>>>>> even say specificially where it got its definition from. >>>>>>>>>> More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES >>>>>>>>> No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any. >>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage >>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit. >>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying >>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>> And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either >>>>>>>>> They're trustworthy sources themselves, >>>>>>>> Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim >>>>>>>> which can't be substantiated anywhere >>>>>>> Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves? >>>>>> Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that >>>>> So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your >>>>> question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's >>>>> claims anyway. >>>> It is in fact doing nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a >>>> bullshit artist >>> No doubt you're too lazy to read though the coroner's report and >>> see it has all the information that the article used. >> Wrong, as always and it provides no information what >> so ever on where they got that volume claim from and >> even google can't find that either you pathetic excuse >> for a bullshit artist > Ah, spinning in circles again. Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something > A typical Rod Speed response to being "done like a dinner". Just another of your pathetic little fantasys with that last
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> - 2026-04-08 09:38 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 10:28 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> - 2026-04-08 13:04 +0800
Re: Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 16:04 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-14 09:05 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 09:51 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-04-14 12:31 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 08:30 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:07 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 14:41 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 08:43 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:10 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 09:18 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:37 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-17 08:17 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:27 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-18 08:46 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 11:49 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-22 08:37 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 14:47 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-23 07:37 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-23 08:21 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-04-23 13:50 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-23 17:04 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-24 09:16 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 10:41 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-25 08:20 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-25 09:40 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-26 07:54 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-26 08:47 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-27 09:14 +1000
Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-27 14:07 +1000
csiph-web