Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > aus.computers > #73949

Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour

From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups aus.computers
Subject Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour
Date 2026-04-27 14:07 +1000
Message-ID <op.3oe62lvdbyq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <69ebecb7@news.ausics.net> <op.3oa5ekoebyq249@pvr2.lan> <69ed3818@news.ausics.net> <op.3ocxkmz4byq249@pvr2.lan> <69ee9c49@news.ausics.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tools
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  understanding, no intelligence, no context, and  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  make sense of anything. They are glorified  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pachinko
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  the output - the ball - tumbling down the most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  the pins based on nothing but chance and which  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  hit.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just did this one,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That result is nothing even remotely like what you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didnt get as useful a result from google

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You just ignored that

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What, that you can't Google?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can and do google

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, that that result is nothing even remotely like what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would get from a glorified pachinko machine

>>>>>>>>>>>> There you go, ignoring that again

>>>>>>>>>>> Yep.

>>>>>>>>>> Because even you realise that you can never
>>>>>>>>>> bullshit your way out of that terminal stupidity

>>>>>>>>> Nope.

>>>>>>>> Yep

>>>>>>> Glad you agree.

>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying  
>>>>>> something

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get this page from a brewery by searching for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "handles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> range
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in your AI answer

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The grok response accurately points out that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the volume varys with the location, fuckwit

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But inaccurately states the volume only varies between  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in   range of 425-450mL

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it does

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and always matches a schooner.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't say that either

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It says it over and over from the start:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit on your ALWAYS lie

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "18 handles of beer" refers to 18 schooners (or pints) of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beer   in   Australian slang"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "A "handle" is a common term for a schooner"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "So, "18 handles" means the person drank 18 schooners"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        a beer glass with a handle, typically holding  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        state.

>>>>>>>>>> Even you realise that you can never
>>>>>>>>>> bullshit your way out of that stupid lie

>>>>>>>>> Umm, That was your AI's lie.

>>>>>>>> You haven't shown that it is a lie

>>>>>>> Only a blind man couldn't see what I've shown, or one of your
>>>>>>> Artificial Idiots.

>>>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag

>>>>>>>>> But I'm glad you finally agree it was   telling you BS.

>>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage

>>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit.

>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying  
>>>>>> something

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like the USSD definition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no USSD definition

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in normal grammar the qualification at the end would only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply   to the part after the "--".

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about the DEPENDING ON THE STATE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NT:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names

>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesnt even say what the volume of a handle of beer is

>>>>>>>>>>> 285ml in the NT like I quoted before.

>>>>>>>>>> Pity we aren't discussing the NT, as I told you before

>>>>>>>>> Your AI didn't know that.

>>>>>>>> Corse it did when it mentioned Flinders Island

>>>>>>> But you didn't, to it.

>>>>>> Didn't need to, it worked that out for itself

>>>>>>>>>>> It also says this which would
>>>>>>>>>>> suggest such terms also mean less than the 425ml for a schooner
>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere in Aus:

>>>>>>>>>>> "By and large, jugs, pints and schooners are a pretty  
>>>>>>>>>>> universally
>>>>>>>>>>>  understood size (except in SA), with most of the smaller  
>>>>>>>>>>> options
>>>>>>>>>>>  often having a name unique to the region."

>>>>>>>>>> That suggests nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
>>>>>>>>>> bullshit   artist

>>>>>>>>> Smaller options have the names "unique to the region" such as
>>>>>>>>> handle.

>>>>>>>> It doesn't say that about the word handle, you pathetic excuse  
>>>>>>>> for a
>>>>>>>> bullshit artist and NO ONE serves options in a container with a
>>>>>>>> handle

>>>>>>> It's about the quantity, the article actually only says they "may
>>>>>>> come with a handle",

>>>>>> Not with that particular volume they don't

>>>>>>> but if you ever got out you'd have seenbeer   glases with handles
>>>>>>> before   anyway.

>>>>>> Not with that particular volume they don't

>>>>>>> It's hillarious how wrong you are,

>>>>>> We'll see...

>>>>>>> here's one with "285ml" actually printed on the side!

>>>>>>> https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/306586746914

>>>>>> Pity that says VINTAGE.

>>>>> Wow, your arguments have got even weaker than your AI's nonsense.

>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag

>>>>> That's just too cute to dispute.

>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag

>>>>>>>>>>>> And neither does anything else that google turns up

>>>>>>>>>> Which blows a fucking great hole in your stupid
>>>>>>>>>> claim that google gets it right and grok doesn't

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Northern Territory's beer sizes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question to the AI never mentioned any location.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did accurately work out where I was getting that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phrase from, presumably by checking when that phrase has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been used recently, something google wouldn't have done

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is no excuse for providing an answer that doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply   in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NT when it doesn't even know for sure that the ABC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article   was what prompted your question.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did work that out. So much for your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid glorified pachinko machine stupidty

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plus it clearly said it applied Australia-wide.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it does with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He says while snipping where it said that.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        a beer glass with a handle, typically holding  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        state.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about the

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         A "handle" is a common term for a schooner --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         a beer glass with a handle, typically holding around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         425-450 ml (about 15 oz) of beer, depending on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         state.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which you carefully omitted from what you quoted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And replacing it with where talked about something else.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it talked about something else

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was speaking about all of Australia and in the NT it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be way off.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But isnt with Flinders Island which is where the phrase
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't even know if the stoneandwood is accurate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for the NT

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well my source is an Australian brewery, your Artificial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot's source is... nothing.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pity about the SOURCES it lists, you pathetic excuse for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit artist

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No cites except the very ABC article that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prompted your question. So there's no way to judge the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of its statement since you can only guess where it might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have   got the info from.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even a terminal fuckwit like you should be able to check  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   SOURCES

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, sources full of random Reddit discussions,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More of your barefaced lies on the random

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which it probably paid attention to instead of better  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results   like the brewery I found.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit it did and it basically said the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, that handle normally means 425-450 ml

>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it only talked about the term being used in the NT,

>>>>>>>>>>>> Which isnt where we are discussing,
>>>>>>>>>>>> so is a completely useless result

>>>>>>>>>>>>> and for the same 285ml quanity as a "middy" or "pot" in other
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sates.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plus it didn't know where you were asking about anyway

>>>>>>>>>>>> Corse it did when it named that explicitly

>>>>>>>>>>>>> so shouldn't assume what it "normally means" there.

>>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't assume anything you pathetic excuse for a bullshit
>>>>>>>>>>>> artist

>>>>>>>>>>> It assumed everything, and clearly got it all wrong.

>>>>>>>>>> It didnt get where the term handle was used
>>>>>>>>>> wrong, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>>>>>> Did so too.

>>>>>>>> How odd that you can't prove that

>>>>>>> Did so too.

>>>>>> Bullshit you ever did

>>>>>>>>>> And you haven't extablished that the term
>>>>>>>>>> handle isnt mostly used for 425-450 ml either

>>>>>>>>> Did so too.

>>>>>>>> How odd that you can't prove that

>>>>>>> Did so too.

>>>>>> Bullshit you ever did

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You say it did correctly pick the article that prompted your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> question:

>>>>>>>>>>>> It clearly did

>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-14/pedestrian-death-flinders-island-coroner-dismissal/106562466

>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I did a web search for "coronial findings tasmania" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual coroner's report that had prompted the article  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.magistratescourt.tas.gov.au/coronerscourt/findings/coronialfindings/2026/Investigation-into-the-death-of-David-Stanley-Bailey-Ruling.pdf

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Footnote number 6, on page 3, is of interest:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> "6 A handle of beer is 285mls in volume."

>>>>>>>>>>>> Just because that fuckwit got that wrong...

>>>>>>>>>>>> No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle

>>>>>>>>>> Have fun listing anywhere that does

>>>>>>>>> Furneaux Tavern where David Bailey was served, of course!

>>>>>>>> You don't know that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>>>> The coroner knows it.

>>>>>> Nope, just ignorantly CLAIMS that

>>>>> So if you only believe AI BS,

>>>> There is no bullshit, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>> why believe anything else they claim?

>>>> Because I haven't seen AI get anything wrong

>>> It was the coroner claiming that, same as everything else in the
>>> article you read.

>> Duh, but even google can't find any substantiation of that claim

>>>>>>>>>>>>> So your Artificial Idiot lied about the quantity meantin the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exact   article that prompted your question!

>>>>>>>>>>>> More of your mindless bullshit

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its total quantity would be off by at least 2.52L!

>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong, as always

>>>>>>>>>>>>> An intelligent web search on the other hand helps get you the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual answer from the source of the article that prompted  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your   question, instead of that useless AI BS.

>>>>>>>>>>>> The fuckwit coroner actually got it wrong
>>>>>>>>>>>> No one serves 285mls of beer in a glass with a handle

>>>>>>>>>>> Hillarious!

>>>>>>>>>> Pathetic!!

>>>>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit.

>>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage

>>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit.

>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying  
>>>>>> something

>>>>>>>>>>> You had to ask what a handle of beer is,

>>>>>>>>>> Because I had never heard that term
>>>>>>>>>> used before for a measure of beer.

>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that comes even close is
>>>>>>>>>> a stein or a jug of beer, both of which I
>>>>>>>>>> have heard plenty of times before

>>>>>>>>> So obviously the brewery

>>>>>>>> The brewery says nothing of the sort
>>>>>>>> you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>>>> You've clearly forgotten what the brewery said at this point.

>>>>>> It never says that you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>>>>>> and coroner know more than you,

>>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage

>>>>>>>>> and as usual the AI doesn't know anything.

>>>>>>>> Neither does google you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist

>>>>>>>>>>> but now you're denying what a brewery,

>>>>>>>>>> It never says that that term is used in Flinders Island

>>>>>>>>>>> and the coroner who first used the phrase,

>>>>>>>>>> And got it wrong and even google proves that

>>>>>>>>> They used the phrase and defined it,

>>>>>>>> With not a shred of evidence that their definition is correct

>>>>>>>>> nothing on Google's going to prove they meant something else.

>>>>>>>> But not a shred of evidence that they got it right

>>>>>>> Where's your AI's shred of evidence they meant 425-450ml instead
>>>>>>> of 285ml like they said?

>>>>>> Its in the SOURCES, fuckwit

>>>>> The SOURCES won't tell you what the coroner was thinking when they
>>>>> said that.

>>>> That wasnt about what the coroner meant,
>>>> its what the TAVERN meant when they told
>>>> the coroner how much he had drank

>>> They clearly said he drank 18 285ml "handles".

>> They never said what the volume of the handles is

> So are you the psychic who knows what the coroner was told by the
> tavern and what they decided to make up out of thin air, or do you
> think you've found a psychic AI?

Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something

> Either way any sane person would
> see that your Artificial Idiot was obviously just plain wrong about
> 425-450ml.

How odd that google doesnt show that

>>>>>>>>>>> both say it means. On the basis of an AI response which doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> even say specificially where it got its definition from.

>>>>>>>>>> More of your stupid bare faced lies with the SOURCES

>>>>>>>>> No evidence which of those it paid attention to, if any.

>>>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage

>>>>>>> Well yes, you are a bit.

>>>>>> Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying  
>>>>>> something

>>>>>>>>>> And the coroner and stoneandwood doesn't either

>>>>>>>>> They're trustworthy sources themselves,

>>>>>>>> Mindless bullshit with the coroner's claim
>>>>>>>> which can't be substantiated anywhere

>>>>>>> Their claim about the meaning of what they said themselves?

>>>>>> Yep, they just claim that and never say where they got that

>>>>> So there was no point to you reading the article that prompted your
>>>>> question to the AI, since it was all just repeating the coroner's
>>>>> claims anyway.

>>>> It is in fact doing nothing of the sort, you pathetic excuse for a
>>>> bullshit artist

>>> No doubt you're too lazy to read though the coroner's report and
>>> see it has all the information that the article used.

>> Wrong, as always and it provides no information what
>> so ever on where they got that volume claim from and
>> even google can't find that either you pathetic excuse
>> for a bullshit artist

> Ah, spinning in circles again.

Even more pathetic than you usually manage and that's saying something

> A typical Rod Speed response to   being "done like a dinner".

Just another of your pathetic little fantasys with that last

Back to aus.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> - 2026-04-08 09:38 +1000
  Re: Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 10:28 +1000
    Re: Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> - 2026-04-08 13:04 +0800
      Re: Testing suggests Google’s AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 16:04 +1000
  Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-14 09:05 +1000
    Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 09:51 +1000
    Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-04-14 12:31 +1000
      Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 08:30 +1000
        Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:07 +1000
    Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 14:41 +1000
      Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 08:43 +1000
        Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:10 +1000
          Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-15 09:18 +1000
            Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-15 09:37 +1000
              Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-17 08:17 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 09:27 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-18 08:46 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 11:49 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-22 08:37 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 14:47 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-23 07:37 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-23 08:21 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-04-23 13:50 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-23 17:04 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-24 09:16 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 10:41 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-25 08:20 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-25 09:40 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-26 07:54 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-26 08:47 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-04-27 09:14 +1000
                Re: Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-04-27 14:07 +1000

csiph-web