Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #509854
| From | Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, alt.global-warming |
| Subject | Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated |
| Date | 2015-07-27 08:57 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mp5kae$q9k$6@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (23 earlier) <mp3n2g$9s1$3@dont-email.me> <mp3njh$uhb$4@dont-email.me> <mp3qsl$ktu$1@dont-email.me> <mp420u$i6n$3@dont-email.me> <mp43uj$a0b$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/26/2015 7:11 PM, Unum wrote: > On 7/26/2015 8:39 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >> On 7/26/2015 4:37 PM, Unum wrote: >>> On 7/26/2015 5:41 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>> On 7/26/2015 3:32 PM, Unum wrote: >>>>> On 7/26/2015 3:38 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>> On 7/26/2015 12:36 PM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 2:03 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 11:09 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 12:38 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 10:19 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 1:07 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 10:44 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 12:00 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 9:32 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 10:03 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:54:45 -0500, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 3:28 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:23:22 -0500, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2015 9:22 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2015 7:18 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/15 8:06 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the journal 'Atmospheric Chemistry and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physics', >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status is currently 1st stage 'discussion paper'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long ways to go before acceptance for final >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it passes 1st and 2nd stages of review, including >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revisions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That may not happen until long after events like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015. Oh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait, there's your answer right there for hyping a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-publication >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft in the media. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Chomp, Did you find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientifically correct? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin Trenberth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hilarious to see him cite Trenberth! Next week the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chumpsky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trenberth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chom knows that the rational (scientific) attitude is to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not the person. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obvious lie, on alt.global-warming chumpsky has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempted to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smear Chris Turney and John Cook in just the past >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lessee ... did Unum's post examine the idea or the person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently chumpsky didn't "find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientifically correct". So what idea are you referring to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to take Hansen seriously one has to imagine that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SLR -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown no acceleration since the end of the Maunder minimum -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, begin to exponentially increase over the next 85 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> years, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Redraw >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the exponential curve in your head as many times as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> order to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> acheive suspension of disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably assumes the ice sheets on Greenland and the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Antarctic >>>>>>>>>>>>> melt into the ocean at increasing rates as many studies >>>>>>>>>>>>> predict. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> WTF does "presumably assumes" mean? Is that what yer regard as >>>>>>>>>>>> sciency >>>>>>>>>>>> language, lil buddy? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You didn't like my choice of words? Oh darn! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, apparently you didn't "find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>> that wasn't scientifically correct". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now we get a tedious parsing of some other words with an obvious >>>>>>>>>>> and clear meaning. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey, ice sheets will melt faster, and I mean definitely >>>>>>>>>> maybe! Yer >>>>>>>>>> unambiguously ambiguous language is the language of equivocating >>>>>>>>>> fruitcakes >>>>>>>>>> and weasels. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> First define what is meant by "scientifically correct". To >>>>>>>>>>>> me it >>>>>>>>>>>> should mean >>>>>>>>>>>> that you have some evidence that nobody has been able to >>>>>>>>>>>> refute. >>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen has >>>>>>>>>>>> been refuted by a number of fellow scientists, therefor one or >>>>>>>>>>>> more of >>>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>>> claims fails the criteria. In reality there is actually no >>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>> thing as >>>>>>>>>>>> "scientifically correct", only evidence, arguments and claims >>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>> have yet >>>>>>>>>>>> to be contradicted. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It could well be that he's been refuted, but I'm noticing you >>>>>>>>>>> aren't citing any of it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yer go back and read agin, lil buddy! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All I see is a link to a chart, if that's all you got fine >>>>>>>>> by me! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Keep looking. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will I see something that isn't there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will be more than happy to oblige once you or Sam clarify >>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>> standard of >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence is required to satisfy the unscientific criteria of >>>>>>>>>>>> "scientifically >>>>>>>>>>>> correct". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If it isn't clear to you now, no amount of explanation will >>>>>>>>>>> help. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A literal interpretation of "scientifically correct" is >>>>>>>>>> "having no >>>>>>>>>> errors" or >>>>>>>>>> "conforming to fact". How exactly do you assert that a future >>>>>>>>>> prediction >>>>>>>>>> involving high uncertainty "conforms to fact" or "has no errors"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So that's your personal bogus interpretation? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, actually the dictionary definition of correct when used in >>>>>>>> adjective form. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "conforming to fact or truth; free from error; accurate" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can understand why you would be so desperate to interpret the >>>>>>> phrase as something impossible to achieve. I'll stick with my >>>>>>> perfectly >>>>>>> reasonable definition below. >>>>>> >>>>>> And I'll stick to pointing out the unsciency foolishness of yer >>>>>> definition. >>>>> >>>>> You begged me on your knees for a clarification and I explained it to >>>>> you. Meanwhile land ice melting has accelerated, hasn't it. >>>>> >>>>> "On average, some 310 cubic kilometres of ice was lost from the ice >>>>> shelves each year during this time, and the rate of loss is increasing >>>>> rapidly." >>>> >>>> Keywest Florida didn't get the message: >>> >>> That the rate of loss is increasing rapidly? Other places seem to >>> be getting it. >>> >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large >>> >>> So now Key West is the one place on Earth that reflects SLR all over >>> the planet? Your "conforming to fact or truth" didn't last very long. >>> >>> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/searise.html >>> >>> http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3072.aspx >>> >>> http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/impact_sea_level_rise.html >>> > > Those cites blew your ass totally out of the water didn't they, lol! > >>>>>>>> We'll just say it >>>>>>>>> means "conforming with the principles of science". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is "scientifically correct", i.e., >>>>>>>> conforming >>>>>>>> to fact >>>>>>>> or truth, free from error, and accurate? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Its simply in conformance with observed empirical evidence such as >>>>>>> accelerating melting of land ice as has been posted here many times. >>>>>> >>>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Greenmobbers normally make stupid statements, so you and Sam are >>>>>>>>>> perfectly in >>>>>>>>>> character... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When desperation sets in you get around to the personal attack >>>>>>>>> phase >>>>>>>>> pretty quick, don't you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Coming from you, the most ironic statement ever. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We'll just note that you did in fact resort to personal attack. >>>>>> >>>>>> The whore Unum takes one ettiquette class and suddenly she becomes >>>>>> self-righteous about courtesy and manners! Considering yer extensive >>>>>> history >>>>>> of Tourette syndrome, ironic doesn't begin to cover it. Have you >>>>>> been >>>>>> taking >>>>>> Tourette suppressants, or something? >>>>> >>>>> Getting a little excited? >>>>> >>>>>> And what's with the use of majestic plurals, did your ettiquette >>>>>> class >>>>>> elevate >>>>>> your caste to royalty? >>>>>> >>>>>> And not just >>>>> >>>>> Click send a little too soon? >>>> >>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? >>> >>> You are welcome to try to find something in a lieblog that indicates >>> otherwise. Better scramble! 90% of the Florida keys are less than 5ft >>> above >>> sea level. Key West is at about 3 feet. >> >> That's not how it works, lil buddy, the onus is not on me to prove or >> disprove >> anything. If you claim 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" >> fact, the onus is entirely yours. > > Actually that is how it works. If you have a dispute with Hansens's > paper other than the nitwit little chart you posted (and which I > refuted) you can just bring it on out. Otherwise we can just assume > that you didn't "find anything in the content that wasn't scientifically > correct". So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large The possible answers are yes, no, or yet more waffling.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:20 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-23 22:13 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worldâ?Ts coasts by the end of the centuryâ?"sooner than previously anticipated "Ringer" <byoung@peoplestel.net> - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world??Ts coasts by the end of the century??"sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:27 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worldâ?Ts coasts by the end of the centuryâ?"sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:15 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 17:18 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated "Ringer" <byoung@peoplestel.net> - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 18:26 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 16:34 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 18:41 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 17:57 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:00 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 18:14 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:22 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 20:40 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-24 01:44 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 19:06 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 20:18 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 19:22 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-23 23:23 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 09:54 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-25 11:03 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 11:32 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-25 10:00 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 12:44 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:54 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 14:28 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-25 11:07 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 12:19 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 10:38 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-26 14:27 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 12:03 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 14:36 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 13:38 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 17:32 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 15:41 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 18:37 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 18:39 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 21:11 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-27 08:57 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-27 17:53 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 21:57 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-27 00:17 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 21:44 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-25 19:27 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 12:29 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-26 18:40 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 14:24 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Desertphile <Desertphile@nospam.org> - 2015-07-29 07:53 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 11:07 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:15 -0400
new noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 21:00 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world¢s coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Desertphile <Desertphile@nospam.org> - 2015-07-29 13:33 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-29 19:48 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-25 21:04 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-25 18:34 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century---sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 16:04 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 03:18 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:51 +0000
Re: Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Nobody <not@home.anymore> - 2015-07-24 01:49 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:18 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 07:32 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 16:14 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-24 21:23 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 06:45 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 16:57 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 20:56 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-07-25 13:08 -0700
csiph-web