Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #509774
| From | Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, alt.global-warming |
| Subject | Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated |
| Date | 2015-07-26 21:11 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mp43uj$a0b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (22 earlier) <mp3gdj$4ep$18@dont-email.me> <mp3n2g$9s1$3@dont-email.me> <mp3njh$uhb$4@dont-email.me> <mp3qsl$ktu$1@dont-email.me> <mp420u$i6n$3@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/26/2015 8:39 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: > On 7/26/2015 4:37 PM, Unum wrote: >> On 7/26/2015 5:41 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>> On 7/26/2015 3:32 PM, Unum wrote: >>>> On 7/26/2015 3:38 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>> On 7/26/2015 12:36 PM, Unum wrote: >>>>>> On 7/26/2015 2:03 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 11:09 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 12:38 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 10:19 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 1:07 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 10:44 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 12:00 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 9:32 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 10:03 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:54:45 -0500, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 3:28 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:23:22 -0500, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2015 9:22 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2015 7:18 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/15 8:06 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the journal 'Atmospheric Chemistry and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physics', >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status is currently 1st stage 'discussion paper'. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long ways to go before acceptance for final >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it passes 1st and 2nd stages of review, including >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revisions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That may not happen until long after events like Paris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015. Oh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait, there's your answer right there for hyping a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-publication >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft in the media. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Chomp, Did you find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientifically correct? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin Trenberth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hilarious to see him cite Trenberth! Next week the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chumpsky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trenberth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chom knows that the rational (scientific) attitude is to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not the person. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obvious lie, on alt.global-warming chumpsky has attempted to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smear Chris Turney and John Cook in just the past couple of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lessee ... did Unum's post examine the idea or the person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently chumpsky didn't "find anything in the content that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientifically correct". So what idea are you referring to? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to take Hansen seriously one has to imagine that >>>>>>>>>>>>> SLR -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>> shown no acceleration since the end of the Maunder minimum -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, at >>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, begin to exponentially increase over the next 85 >>>>>>>>>>>>> years, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Redraw >>>>>>>>>>>>> the exponential curve in your head as many times as >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary in >>>>>>>>>>>>> order to >>>>>>>>>>>>> acheive suspension of disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably assumes the ice sheets on Greenland and the Antarctic >>>>>>>>>>>> melt into the ocean at increasing rates as many studies predict. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WTF does "presumably assumes" mean? Is that what yer regard as >>>>>>>>>>> sciency >>>>>>>>>>> language, lil buddy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You didn't like my choice of words? Oh darn! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, apparently you didn't "find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>> that wasn't scientifically correct". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now we get a tedious parsing of some other words with an obvious >>>>>>>>>> and clear meaning. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey, ice sheets will melt faster, and I mean definitely maybe! Yer >>>>>>>>> unambiguously ambiguous language is the language of equivocating >>>>>>>>> fruitcakes >>>>>>>>> and weasels. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> First define what is meant by "scientifically correct". To me it >>>>>>>>>>> should mean >>>>>>>>>>> that you have some evidence that nobody has been able to refute. >>>>>>>>>>> Hansen has >>>>>>>>>>> been refuted by a number of fellow scientists, therefor one or >>>>>>>>>>> more of >>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>> claims fails the criteria. In reality there is actually no such >>>>>>>>>>> thing as >>>>>>>>>>> "scientifically correct", only evidence, arguments and claims >>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>> have yet >>>>>>>>>>> to be contradicted. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It could well be that he's been refuted, but I'm noticing you >>>>>>>>>> aren't citing any of it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yer go back and read agin, lil buddy! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All I see is a link to a chart, if that's all you got fine >>>>>>>> by me! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keep looking. >>>>>> >>>>>> Will I see something that isn't there? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will be more than happy to oblige once you or Sam clarify what >>>>>>>>>>> standard of >>>>>>>>>>> evidence is required to satisfy the unscientific criteria of >>>>>>>>>>> "scientifically >>>>>>>>>>> correct". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If it isn't clear to you now, no amount of explanation will help. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A literal interpretation of "scientifically correct" is "having no >>>>>>>>> errors" or >>>>>>>>> "conforming to fact". How exactly do you assert that a future >>>>>>>>> prediction >>>>>>>>> involving high uncertainty "conforms to fact" or "has no errors"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So that's your personal bogus interpretation? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, actually the dictionary definition of correct when used in >>>>>>> adjective form. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "conforming to fact or truth; free from error; accurate" >>>>>> >>>>>> I can understand why you would be so desperate to interpret the >>>>>> phrase as something impossible to achieve. I'll stick with my >>>>>> perfectly >>>>>> reasonable definition below. >>>>> >>>>> And I'll stick to pointing out the unsciency foolishness of yer >>>>> definition. >>>> >>>> You begged me on your knees for a clarification and I explained it to >>>> you. Meanwhile land ice melting has accelerated, hasn't it. >>>> >>>> "On average, some 310 cubic kilometres of ice was lost from the ice >>>> shelves each year during this time, and the rate of loss is increasing >>>> rapidly." >>> >>> Keywest Florida didn't get the message: >> >> That the rate of loss is increasing rapidly? Other places seem to >> be getting it. >> >>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large >> >> So now Key West is the one place on Earth that reflects SLR all over >> the planet? Your "conforming to fact or truth" didn't last very long. >> >> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/searise.html >> >> http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3072.aspx >> >> http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/impact_sea_level_rise.html Those cites blew your ass totally out of the water didn't they, lol! >>>>>>> We'll just say it >>>>>>>> means "conforming with the principles of science". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is "scientifically correct", i.e., conforming >>>>>>> to fact >>>>>>> or truth, free from error, and accurate? >>>>>> >>>>>> Its simply in conformance with observed empirical evidence such as >>>>>> accelerating melting of land ice as has been posted here many times. >>>>> >>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Greenmobbers normally make stupid statements, so you and Sam are >>>>>>>>> perfectly in >>>>>>>>> character... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When desperation sets in you get around to the personal attack phase >>>>>>>> pretty quick, don't you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Coming from you, the most ironic statement ever. >>>>>> >>>>>> We'll just note that you did in fact resort to personal attack. >>>>> >>>>> The whore Unum takes one ettiquette class and suddenly she becomes >>>>> self-righteous about courtesy and manners! Considering yer extensive >>>>> history >>>>> of Tourette syndrome, ironic doesn't begin to cover it. Have you been >>>>> taking >>>>> Tourette suppressants, or something? >>>> >>>> Getting a little excited? >>>> >>>>> And what's with the use of majestic plurals, did your ettiquette class >>>>> elevate >>>>> your caste to royalty? >>>>> >>>>> And not just >>>> >>>> Click send a little too soon? >>> >>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? >> >> You are welcome to try to find something in a lieblog that indicates >> otherwise. Better scramble! 90% of the Florida keys are less than 5ft above >> sea level. Key West is at about 3 feet. > > That's not how it works, lil buddy, the onus is not on me to prove or disprove > anything. If you claim 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" > fact, the onus is entirely yours. Actually that is how it works. If you have a dispute with Hansens's paper other than the nitwit little chart you posted (and which I refuted) you can just bring it on out. Otherwise we can just assume that you didn't "find anything in the content that wasn't scientifically correct".
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:20 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-23 22:13 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worldâ?Ts coasts by the end of the centuryâ?"sooner than previously anticipated "Ringer" <byoung@peoplestel.net> - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world??Ts coasts by the end of the century??"sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:27 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worldâ?Ts coasts by the end of the centuryâ?"sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:15 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 17:18 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated "Ringer" <byoung@peoplestel.net> - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 18:26 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 16:34 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 18:41 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 17:57 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:00 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 18:14 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:22 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 20:40 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-24 01:44 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 19:06 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 20:18 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 19:22 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-23 23:23 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 09:54 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-25 11:03 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 11:32 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-25 10:00 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 12:44 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:54 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 14:28 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-25 11:07 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 12:19 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 10:38 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-26 14:27 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 12:03 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 14:36 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 13:38 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 17:32 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 15:41 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 18:37 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 18:39 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 21:11 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-27 08:57 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-27 17:53 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 21:57 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-27 00:17 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 21:44 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-25 19:27 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 12:29 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-26 18:40 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 14:24 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Desertphile <Desertphile@nospam.org> - 2015-07-29 07:53 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 11:07 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:15 -0400
new noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 21:00 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world¢s coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Desertphile <Desertphile@nospam.org> - 2015-07-29 13:33 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-29 19:48 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-25 21:04 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-25 18:34 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century---sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 16:04 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 03:18 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:51 +0000
Re: Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Nobody <not@home.anymore> - 2015-07-24 01:49 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:18 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 07:32 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 16:14 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-24 21:23 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 06:45 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 16:57 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 20:56 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-07-25 13:08 -0700
csiph-web