Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #509937
| From | Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, alt.global-warming |
| Subject | Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated |
| Date | 2015-07-27 17:53 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mp6cll$ip7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (24 earlier) <mp3njh$uhb$4@dont-email.me> <mp3qsl$ktu$1@dont-email.me> <mp420u$i6n$3@dont-email.me> <mp43uj$a0b$1@dont-email.me> <mp5kae$q9k$6@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/27/2015 10:57 AM, Chom Noamsky wrote: > On 7/26/2015 7:11 PM, Unum wrote: >> On 7/26/2015 8:39 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>> On 7/26/2015 4:37 PM, Unum wrote: >>>> On 7/26/2015 5:41 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>> On 7/26/2015 3:32 PM, Unum wrote: >>>>>> On 7/26/2015 3:38 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 12:36 PM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 2:03 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 11:09 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 12:38 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2015 10:19 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 1:07 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 10:44 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 12:00 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 9:32 AM, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 10:03 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:54:45 -0500, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/25/2015 3:28 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:23:22 -0500, Unum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2015 9:22 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2015 7:18 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/15 8:06 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the journal 'Atmospheric Chemistry and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physics', >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status is currently 1st stage 'discussion paper'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long ways to go before acceptance for final >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> publication, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it passes 1st and 2nd stages of review, including >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revisions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That may not happen until long after events like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015. Oh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait, there's your answer right there for hyping a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-publication >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft in the media. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Chomp, Did you find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientifically correct? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin Trenberth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hilarious to see him cite Trenberth! Next week the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chumpsky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trenberth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chom knows that the rational (scientific) attitude is to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not the person. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obvious lie, on alt.global-warming chumpsky has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempted to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smear Chris Turney and John Cook in just the past >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lessee ... did Unum's post examine the idea or the person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently chumpsky didn't "find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientifically correct". So what idea are you referring to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to take Hansen seriously one has to imagine that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SLR -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown no acceleration since the end of the Maunder minimum -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, begin to exponentially increase over the next 85 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Redraw >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the exponential curve in your head as many times as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acheive suspension of disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably assumes the ice sheets on Greenland and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antarctic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> melt into the ocean at increasing rates as many studies >>>>>>>>>>>>>> predict. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> WTF does "presumably assumes" mean? Is that what yer regard as >>>>>>>>>>>>> sciency >>>>>>>>>>>>> language, lil buddy? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't like my choice of words? Oh darn! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, apparently you didn't "find anything in the content >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that wasn't scientifically correct". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now we get a tedious parsing of some other words with an obvious >>>>>>>>>>>> and clear meaning. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey, ice sheets will melt faster, and I mean definitely >>>>>>>>>>> maybe! Yer >>>>>>>>>>> unambiguously ambiguous language is the language of equivocating >>>>>>>>>>> fruitcakes >>>>>>>>>>> and weasels. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> First define what is meant by "scientifically correct". To >>>>>>>>>>>>> me it >>>>>>>>>>>>> should mean >>>>>>>>>>>>> that you have some evidence that nobody has been able to >>>>>>>>>>>>> refute. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hansen has >>>>>>>>>>>>> been refuted by a number of fellow scientists, therefor one or >>>>>>>>>>>>> more of >>>>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>>>> claims fails the criteria. In reality there is actually no >>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>> thing as >>>>>>>>>>>>> "scientifically correct", only evidence, arguments and claims >>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>> have yet >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be contradicted. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It could well be that he's been refuted, but I'm noticing you >>>>>>>>>>>> aren't citing any of it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yer go back and read agin, lil buddy! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All I see is a link to a chart, if that's all you got fine >>>>>>>>>> by me! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Keep looking. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will I see something that isn't there? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be more than happy to oblige once you or Sam clarify >>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard of >>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence is required to satisfy the unscientific criteria of >>>>>>>>>>>>> "scientifically >>>>>>>>>>>>> correct". >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If it isn't clear to you now, no amount of explanation will >>>>>>>>>>>> help. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A literal interpretation of "scientifically correct" is >>>>>>>>>>> "having no >>>>>>>>>>> errors" or >>>>>>>>>>> "conforming to fact". How exactly do you assert that a future >>>>>>>>>>> prediction >>>>>>>>>>> involving high uncertainty "conforms to fact" or "has no errors"? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So that's your personal bogus interpretation? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope, actually the dictionary definition of correct when used in >>>>>>>>> adjective form. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "conforming to fact or truth; free from error; accurate" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can understand why you would be so desperate to interpret the >>>>>>>> phrase as something impossible to achieve. I'll stick with my >>>>>>>> perfectly >>>>>>>> reasonable definition below. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I'll stick to pointing out the unsciency foolishness of yer >>>>>>> definition. >>>>>> >>>>>> You begged me on your knees for a clarification and I explained it to >>>>>> you. Meanwhile land ice melting has accelerated, hasn't it. >>>>>> >>>>>> "On average, some 310 cubic kilometres of ice was lost from the ice >>>>>> shelves each year during this time, and the rate of loss is increasing >>>>>> rapidly." >>>>> >>>>> Keywest Florida didn't get the message: >>>> >>>> That the rate of loss is increasing rapidly? Other places seem to >>>> be getting it. >>>> >>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large >>>> >>>> So now Key West is the one place on Earth that reflects SLR all over >>>> the planet? Your "conforming to fact or truth" didn't last very long. >>>> >>>> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/searise.html >>>> >>>> http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3072.aspx >>>> >>>> http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/impact_sea_level_rise.html >>>> >> >> Those cites blew your ass totally out of the water didn't they, lol! >> >>>>>>>>> We'll just say it >>>>>>>>>> means "conforming with the principles of science". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is "scientifically correct", i.e., >>>>>>>>> conforming >>>>>>>>> to fact >>>>>>>>> or truth, free from error, and accurate? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Its simply in conformance with observed empirical evidence such as >>>>>>>> accelerating melting of land ice as has been posted here many times. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Greenmobbers normally make stupid statements, so you and Sam are >>>>>>>>>>> perfectly in >>>>>>>>>>> character... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When desperation sets in you get around to the personal attack >>>>>>>>>> phase >>>>>>>>>> pretty quick, don't you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Coming from you, the most ironic statement ever. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We'll just note that you did in fact resort to personal attack. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The whore Unum takes one ettiquette class and suddenly she becomes >>>>>>> self-righteous about courtesy and manners! Considering yer extensive >>>>>>> history >>>>>>> of Tourette syndrome, ironic doesn't begin to cover it. Have you >>>>>>> been >>>>>>> taking >>>>>>> Tourette suppressants, or something? >>>>>> >>>>>> Getting a little excited? >>>>>> >>>>>>> And what's with the use of majestic plurals, did your ettiquette >>>>>>> class >>>>>>> elevate >>>>>>> your caste to royalty? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And not just >>>>>> >>>>>> Click send a little too soon? >>>>> >>>>> So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? >>>> >>>> You are welcome to try to find something in a lieblog that indicates >>>> otherwise. Better scramble! 90% of the Florida keys are less than 5ft >>>> above >>>> sea level. Key West is at about 3 feet. >>> >>> That's not how it works, lil buddy, the onus is not on me to prove or >>> disprove >>> anything. If you claim 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" >>> fact, the onus is entirely yours. >> >> Actually that is how it works. If you have a dispute with Hansens's >> paper other than the nitwit little chart you posted (and which I >> refuted) you can just bring it on out. Otherwise we can just assume >> that you didn't "find anything in the content that wasn't scientifically >> correct". > > So 10ft of SLR by 2100 is a "scientifically correct" fact? When did you stop beating your wife? > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKudLCwWwAIH8SP.png:large So now Key West is the one place on Earth that reflects SLR all over the planet? Your "conforming to fact or truth" didn't last very long. > The possible answers are yes, no, or yet more waffling. My cites blew your ass totally out of the water didn't they, lol! http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/searise.html http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/climate/page/3072.aspx http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/impact_sea_level_rise.html
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:20 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-23 22:13 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worldâ?Ts coasts by the end of the centuryâ?"sooner than previously anticipated "Ringer" <byoung@peoplestel.net> - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world??Ts coasts by the end of the century??"sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:27 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worldâ?Ts coasts by the end of the centuryâ?"sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:15 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 17:18 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated "Ringer" <byoung@peoplestel.net> - 2015-07-23 17:48 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 18:26 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 16:34 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 18:41 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 17:57 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:00 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 18:14 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:22 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 20:40 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-24 01:44 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 19:06 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 20:18 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 19:22 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-23 23:23 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 09:54 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-25 11:03 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 11:32 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-25 10:00 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-25 12:44 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:54 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 14:28 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-25 11:07 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 12:19 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 10:38 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-26 14:27 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 12:03 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 14:36 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 13:38 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 17:32 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 15:41 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 18:37 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-26 18:39 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 21:11 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-27 08:57 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-27 17:53 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 21:57 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-27 00:17 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 21:44 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-25 19:27 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 12:29 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-26 18:40 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> - 2015-07-26 14:24 -0500
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the worlds coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Desertphile <Desertphile@nospam.org> - 2015-07-29 07:53 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 11:07 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:15 -0400
new noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 21:00 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world¢s coasts by the end of the centurysooner than previously anticipated Desertphile <Desertphile@nospam.org> - 2015-07-29 13:33 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-29 19:48 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world?s coasts by the end of the century?sooner than previously anticipated R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-25 21:04 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2015-07-25 18:34 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century---sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 16:04 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 03:18 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:51 +0000
Re: Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Nobody <not@home.anymore> - 2015-07-24 01:49 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:18 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 07:32 -0400
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Chom Noamsky <moose-riders-suck@bc.commmmm> - 2015-07-23 16:14 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-24 21:23 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 06:45 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0600
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world’s coasts by the end of the century—sooner than previously anticipated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 16:57 +0000
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 20:56 -0700
Re: New research suggests rising oceans could swamp the world's coasts by the end of the century--sooner than previously anticipated Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-07-25 13:08 -0700
csiph-web