Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11021
| From | Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? |
| Date | 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wJtd8-1VM-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJt3r-1Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine learning >> library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we might >> be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib? > The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it > already, use that". The slightly longer answer is that I don't think > that this is the right thing for Debian to do. We are then shipping an > old version of matplotlib, i.e. oldstable, with a new release of our > distribution. I do also think that that long-term support version 2 of > matplotlib should remain in our distribution. So we would need to find > a way to support two versions for the same distribution. Kind of answering myself - I do not see a rush, either. I was just positively surprised about Orange and would like many users to share that experience with Buster - not two years later. How deep is the Python Policy wrt package naming set in stone? Wrt to the renaming that Andreas suggested - I would be prepared to work through renames of matlibtools to matlibtools2 in all those source trees that are incompatible with version 3. Cheers, Steffen
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200
csiph-web