Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11015
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? |
| Date | 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wJrEl-1aA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrkZ-OP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJruF-S0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:55:40AM +0100, ghisvail@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not
> > > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3
> > > would
> > > be a breach of policy.
> >
> > Probably.
>
> Described in Section 2.2 of the Debian Python policy.
Depending how heavy Steffen would volunteer to patch and also rename the
module (which I would not consider a very sensible idea).
> > I'm not sure what might be the difference between:
> >
> > 3.0.0 Stable version
> > 2.2.3 LTS LTS version
> >
> > We have some months left until freeze so may be right now it is not
> > to
> > late to package what upstream considers stable.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
>
>
> >From the upstream homepage: "Matplotlib 3.0 is Python 3 only."
>
> Afaik, Python 2 is still considered relevant for the Buster release
> cycle. Hence why I am suggesting to wait for the next release cycle
> before upgrading key scientific packages, such as matplotlib, to Python
> 3 only.
Right. This would surely kick several scientific packages.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200
csiph-web