Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11025
| From | Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? |
| Date | 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wJtPP-2nU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <wJrO1-1dS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJsqK-1qy-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJsTM-1Po-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJtmN-1YR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJtGa-2kV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
ghisvail@gmail.com writes: > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:45 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: >> ghisvail@gmail.com writes: >> > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, >> > including >> > Python 3. >> > >> > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only versions, >> > introducing new legacy packages for Python 2, and patching the >> > large >> > collection of packages relying on the Python 2 versions of these >> > sounds >> > like a lot of work for the time we have got left in the Buster >> > release >> > cycle. >> >> In my understanding there is no need to patch any of the reverse >> dependencies. Currently there are binary packages called python-numpy >> and python3-numpy, built from a source package called python-numpy. >> In >> my understanding the proposed change is to keep having the exact same >> binary packages, just built from two different source packages >> (python-numpy and python-numpy-legacy or whatever). > > Oh, I see what you mean. > > So you'd have: > > - src:python-numpy-legacy providing python-numpy (<2.0) only > - src:python-numpy providing python3-numpy (>=2.0) only > > Assuming version 2 is when the split happens. > > Am I correct? Yeah, this would be my understanding of the plan. Things could get more complex if the same split needs to happen at many levels of the stack (a library that uses numpy is only compatible with numpy <2.0, followed by another one on the next level down). -- Arto Jantunen
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200
csiph-web