Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11022
| From | Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? |
| Date | 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wJtmN-1YR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <wJruF-S0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrEl-1aA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrO1-1dS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJsqK-1qy-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJsTM-1Po-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
ghisvail@gmail.com writes: > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, including > Python 3. > > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only versions, > introducing new legacy packages for Python 2, and patching the large > collection of packages relying on the Python 2 versions of these sounds > like a lot of work for the time we have got left in the Buster release > cycle. In my understanding there is no need to patch any of the reverse dependencies. Currently there are binary packages called python-numpy and python3-numpy, built from a source package called python-numpy. In my understanding the proposed change is to keep having the exact same binary packages, just built from two different source packages (python-numpy and python-numpy-legacy or whatever). -- Arto Jantunen
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200
csiph-web