Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11023

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

From ghisvail@gmail.com
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?
Date 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Message-ID <wJtwu-2hw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJt3r-1Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJtd8-1VM-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 10:42 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > > Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine
> > > learning
> > > library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we
> > > might
> > > be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib?
> > The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it 
> > already, use that". The slightly longer answer is that I don't
> > think 
> > that this is the right thing for Debian to do. We are then shipping
> > an 
> > old version of matplotlib, i.e. oldstable, with a new release of
> > our 
> > distribution. I do also think that that long-term support version 2
> > of 
> > matplotlib should remain in our distribution. So we would need to
> > find 
> > a way to support two versions for the same distribution.
> 
> Kind of answering myself - I do not see a rush, either. I was just 
> positively surprised about Orange and would like many users to share 
> that experience with Buster - not two years later.

Looking at their release history [1], the upstream release cadence is
once a month.

Assuming the freeze takes about three months to complete (quite
optimisticly), will upstream be interested in feedback and bug reports
from 3 releases ago? Maybe.

What about a year later? That would be 15 releases ago. I am not too
sure about it. They'll just ask you to use Anaconda [2], which is the
very first entry in their installation instructions.

Don't you think?

[1] https://pypi.org/project/Orange3/#history
[2] https://orange.biolab.si/download/

Cheers,
Ghis

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
          Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
            Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
              Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
                Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
    Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
      Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
        Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
  Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200

csiph-web