Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11023
| From | ghisvail@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? |
| Date | 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wJtwu-2hw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wJihH-412-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJrbj-LD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJt3r-1Sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wJtd8-1VM-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 10:42 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine > > > learning > > > library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we > > > might > > > be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib? > > The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it > > already, use that". The slightly longer answer is that I don't > > think > > that this is the right thing for Debian to do. We are then shipping > > an > > old version of matplotlib, i.e. oldstable, with a new release of > > our > > distribution. I do also think that that long-term support version 2 > > of > > matplotlib should remain in our distribution. So we would need to > > find > > a way to support two versions for the same distribution. > > Kind of answering myself - I do not see a rush, either. I was just > positively surprised about Orange and would like many users to share > that experience with Buster - not two years later. Looking at their release history [1], the upstream release cadence is once a month. Assuming the freeze takes about three months to complete (quite optimisticly), will upstream be interested in feedback and bug reports from 3 releases ago? Maybe. What about a year later? That would be 15 releases ago. I am not too sure about it. They'll just ask you to use Anaconda [2], which is the very first entry in their installation instructions. Don't you think? [1] https://pypi.org/project/Orange3/#history [2] https://orange.biolab.si/download/ Cheers, Ghis
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-15 23:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 08:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2018-10-16 09:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 10:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Arto Jantunen <viiru@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 11:30 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2018-10-16 12:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de> - 2018-10-16 10:40 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2018-10-16 10:50 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? ghisvail@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2018-10-16 14:40 +0200
csiph-web