Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9925

Re: snap in debian

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 5 October 2017 at 09:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hudson@canonical.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 5 October 2017 at 09:52, Brian May <bam@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> writes:
>> > Can you elaborate? Do you have apparmor enabled? I am aware that there
>> are
>> > problems on stable currently but being explicit reduces guessing.
>>
>> See the stack overflow question. The major issue was the error when
>> trying to remove an existing container.
>>
>> 2017-09-09T15:08:29+10:00 ERROR cannot remove snap file "robotica", will
>> retry in 3 mins: snap-robotica-x1.mount failed to stop: timeout
>>
>
> Ah OK. I've not seen this.
>
> I also had problems with incorrect permissions randomly appearing, even
>> though I used exactly the same process every time.
>
>
> Or that. Time to rebuild my stretch vm I guess (I accidentally upgraded it
> to sid...).
>

I've rebuilt my VM and things seem to mostly work (so long as I leave
apparmor off). Can you provide reproduction instructions for either of your
problems?


> > Can you try just installing the package from unstable rather than
>> > rebuilding it? (sometimes static linking does solve problems :-p)
>>
>> I was guessing it won't be possible to install the package straight from
>> unstable onto a stable system, and am not interested in upgrading at
>> this point to unstable. However I might be wrong here.
>
>
> Yes, telling everyone to upgrade to unstable is not a good answer.
>
> It does look to me from staring at Depends: as if snapd 2.27.6-2 from sid
> will install OK on stretch. But I haven't tried it.
>

You can install the deb from testing on stretch, it turns out.

Cheers,
mwh

In any case, my
>> research led me to believe the first error *might* be a kernel
>> issue... I believe my packages to be fine.
>>
>> The only response I got however was an implied "don't use snap" and "I
>> personally don't like the concept of snap". which wasn't really helpful.
>>
>
> Yes. Let's see if I can find some better answers...
>
> Cheers,
> mwh
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:30 +0200
  Re: pycharm package in debian Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com> - 2017-09-30 15:40 +0200
  Re: pycharm package in debian Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2017-09-30 16:40 +0200
    Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 03:40 +0200
      Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:30 +0200
        Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 09:40 +0200
          Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:50 +0200
            Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 10:50 +0200
              Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 11:10 +0200
                Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 11:50 +0200
            Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 21:40 +0200
              Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 22:10 +0200
              Re: pycharm package in debian Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:00 +0200
                Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:40 +0200
                Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:50 +0200
                Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
                Re: pycharm package in debian Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:50 +0200
                Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-05 01:10 +0200
        Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 17:00 +0200
          Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 18:20 +0200
            Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 18:40 +0200
              Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
              Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
          Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 20:20 +0200
            Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 23:20 +0200
        snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 22:50 +0200
          Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 22:40 +0200
            Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:00 +0200
              Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:10 +0200
              Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
                Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 01:50 +0200
                Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 02:20 +0200
                Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 03:20 +0200
                Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 04:30 +0200
        Re: pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 02:30 +0200

csiph-web