Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9900
| From | Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pycharm package in debian |
| Date | 2017-10-01 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uvSIN-6wW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <uvBoB-3Mo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvGRk-7wg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvH10-7A2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvHaF-7E0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvSfN-67y-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/10/17 20:33, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/01/2017 09:47 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> Besides, rrom an end-user perspective, I can't picture anyone preferring >> the (potentially lagging) packaged version over more official means like >> the Jetbrains app or the snap package, both of which have been good at >> keeping up with updates. > > I definitively prefer a Debian package in main, even if it is "lagging > behind" as you said. For such a thing as an IDE, I expect it to be > mature enough so that the older version is enough for the everyday use. > And I would feel safer than using any random snap package. Who knows > what security issue is in there and what security policy and procedure > (if any) is in place. You guessed it there are none. Confinement is disabled for the pycharm snap, so it behaves like any other application installed via a deb package. >> Don't get me wrong, I understand the rationales from a DFSG perspective. >> I am just questioning whether users of this particular piece of software >> would particularly care. > > I at least would care. And would very much welcome anyone doing the work > of packaging and maintaining this kind of software. Don't get me wrong, I would welcome such effort too. I just wanted to emphasize the implication and level of commitment that such effort would require. We have been there with eclipse and atom, the former is (still) lagging quite badly, and the latter was stopped at the initial packaging stage. Ghis
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com> - 2017-09-30 15:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2017-09-30 16:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 03:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 09:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 11:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 11:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 21:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 22:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-05 01:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 17:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 18:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 18:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 20:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 23:20 +0200
snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 22:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 22:40 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:00 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:10 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 01:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 02:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 03:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 04:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 02:30 +0200
csiph-web