Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9918
| From | Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pycharm package in debian |
| Date | 2017-10-04 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uwZId-3la-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <uvHaF-7E0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvSfN-67y-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvUrf-7kL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uw4qC-52e-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwZfb-39t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 at 14:11:02 -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> I do wish that these third party app systems like conda, snappy or
> flatpak would include metadata like AppStream or DOAP.
Flatpak already does.
Flatpak apps nearly always include AppStream metadata, which Flatpak's
repository maintenance tool aggregates into AppStream distro XML in
special branches in the repository for easier access (analogous to how dak
aggregates dpkg metadata into dists/**/Packages, and AppStream metadata
into DEP-11 YAML). Any Flatpak package that doesn't have AppStream
metadata won't appear in GNOME Software (and probably other GUIs), and so
will only be installable via the CLI or a web link to a .flatpakref file.
DOAP isn't really for this: it provides developer-facing information
about projects (source packages), whereas AppStream provides user-facing
information about apps (binary packages). If AppStream is like dpkg
binary package metadata (control.tar.*), then DOAP is more like the
first paragraph of debian/control in a dpkg source package.
Regards,
smcv
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com> - 2017-09-30 15:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2017-09-30 16:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 03:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 09:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 11:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 11:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 21:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 22:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-05 01:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 17:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 18:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 18:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 20:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 23:20 +0200
snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 22:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 22:40 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:00 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:10 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 01:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 02:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 03:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 04:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 02:30 +0200
csiph-web