Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9894
| From | Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pycharm package in debian |
| Date | 2017-10-01 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uvJ2O-om-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <uvHaF-7E0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvI6J-8eP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvIq6-9D-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvIq6-9D-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvIq6-9D-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> writes: > All 3 means of installation (Jetbrain's app, snap and potentially apt) > are one-liners for the end-user. So, ease-of-use is hardly a > compelling argument. That's not the argument I made. I am satying that there are people who are not in the set of people who will install Snap or Flatpak or etc., because it's too much hassle to know whether it is free software or whether it will work correctly with the rest of the system. Getting the work as free software in Debian opens up the package for installation by those people. I count myself among them. I say this to counter the idea that there is a set of “users of this software package” that is not affected by whether the software is in Debian. That is false, and indeed getting the package maintained in Debian is a way to *increase* the potential members of that set. So, I don't find the “would users of this software package care about it being in Debian” query not compelling, because it makes a false assumption about the relationship. -- \ “If we ruin the Earth, there is no place else to go. This is | `\ not a disposable world, and we are not yet able to re-engineer | _o__) other planets.” —Carl Sagan, _Cosmos_, 1980 | Ben Finney
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com> - 2017-09-30 15:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2017-09-30 16:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 03:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 09:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 11:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 11:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 21:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 22:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-05 01:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 17:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 18:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 18:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 20:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 23:20 +0200
snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 22:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 22:40 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:00 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:10 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 01:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 02:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 03:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 04:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 02:30 +0200
csiph-web