Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9917
| From | Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: snap in debian |
| Date | 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uwZ5v-33t-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <uvBoB-3Mo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvGRk-7wg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uvTlv-6JE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwYCu-2yv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uwYVP-2HM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 5 October 2017 at 09:52, Brian May <bam@debian.org> wrote: > Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> writes: > > Can you elaborate? Do you have apparmor enabled? I am aware that there > are > > problems on stable currently but being explicit reduces guessing. > > See the stack overflow question. The major issue was the error when > trying to remove an existing container. > > 2017-09-09T15:08:29+10:00 ERROR cannot remove snap file "robotica", will > retry in 3 mins: snap-robotica-x1.mount failed to stop: timeout > Ah OK. I've not seen this. I also had problems with incorrect permissions randomly appearing, even > though I used exactly the same process every time. Or that. Time to rebuild my stretch vm I guess (I accidentally upgraded it to sid...). > Can you try just installing the package from unstable rather than > > rebuilding it? (sometimes static linking does solve problems :-p) > > I was guessing it won't be possible to install the package straight from > unstable onto a stable system, and am not interested in upgrading at > this point to unstable. However I might be wrong here. Yes, telling everyone to upgrade to unstable is not a good answer. It does look to me from staring at Depends: as if snapd 2.27.6-2 from sid will install OK on stretch. But I haven't tried it. In any case, my > research led me to believe the first error *might* be a kernel > issue... I believe my packages to be fine. > > The only response I got however was an implied "don't use snap" and "I > personally don't like the concept of snap". which wasn't really helpful. > Yes. Let's see if I can find some better answers... Cheers, mwh
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 14:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com> - 2017-09-30 15:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2017-09-30 16:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 03:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 09:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 09:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 11:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 11:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 21:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 22:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 10:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:50 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-10-05 01:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 17:00 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 18:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 18:40 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-02 00:10 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 20:20 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 23:20 +0200
snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-01 22:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 22:40 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:00 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 23:10 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-04 23:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 01:50 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 02:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2017-10-09 03:20 +0200
Re: snap in debian Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 04:30 +0200
Re: pycharm package in debian kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 02:30 +0200
csiph-web