Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity
314511 articles, 558 threads (numbers 344604 – 670942) — flat view
| Advanced| Subject | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| [Research] Solving the Hubble Tension via the Kappa-Model (13 replies) | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-12 11:33 +0000 |
| → Re: [Research] Solving the Hubble Tension via the Kappa-Model | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-12 08:14 -0700 |
| → Re: Technical Update] Empirical Evidence and Core Mechanics of the Kappa-Model | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-13 00:09 +0000 |
| → Re: Technical Update] Empirical Evidence and Core Mechanics of the Kappa-Model | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-12 22:34 -0700 |
| → Re:Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-14 05:49 +0000 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-14 08:11 -0700 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-14 09:34 -0700 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-18 14:47 +0000 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-18 14:48 +0000 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-18 08:35 -0700 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-18 11:26 -0700 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-18 12:04 -0700 |
| → Re: Theoretical Background: The Ontological Definition of Space , and Measure-Theoretic Solutions | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-18 12:15 -0700 |
| → Re: [Research] Solving the Hubble Tension via the Kappa-Model | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-13 07:52 +0200 |
| Pinpoint Redshift Analysis: Discard the Stained Kaleidoscope for a Clear Telescope (3 replies) | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-14 01:16 +0000 |
| → Re: Pinpoint Redshift Analysis: Discard the Stained Kaleidoscope for a Clear Telescope | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-13 21:59 -0700 |
| → Re: Pinpoint Redshift Analysis: Discard the Stained Kaleidoscope for a Clear Telescope | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-16 17:52 -0700 |
| → Re: Pinpoint Redshift Analysis: Discard the Stained Kaleidoscope for a Clear Telescope | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-17 15:57 -0700 |
| Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? (8 replies) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-10 13:00 -0700 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-10 23:57 -0700 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-12 20:38 -0700 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-12 22:09 -0700 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-13 08:05 +0200 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-13 00:50 -0700 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-13 09:49 -0700 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-14 10:36 +0200 |
| → Re: Flying Saucers UFO, UFP, FUP? | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-16 11:16 -0700 |
| He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... (8 replies) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-12 11:06 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-12 11:09 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-12 12:19 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-12 13:29 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-12 20:36 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-13 10:19 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-13 12:11 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-13 09:52 -0700 |
| → Re: He Was Missing Part of His Arm. Russia Sent Him Into Battle Anyway... | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-13 10:06 -0700 |
| Fermi paradox (7 replies) | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-06 10:52 +0200 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-06 08:37 -0700 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-06 11:10 -0700 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-07 00:47 -0700 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-07 10:14 +0200 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | Ray Stone <rstonetech80@nospam.invalid> | 2026-05-12 11:31 +0000 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-12 10:52 -0700 |
| → Re: Fermi paradox | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-13 07:57 +0200 |
| The small LLM revolution [Timothy Chow in your Poket] (Re: ChatGPT 5.x so bad, it will give back jobs to Gen Z [Its the Shiiit]) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-05-12 21:23 +0200 |
| Chicken Little Is Dead! (3 replies) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-10 12:44 -0700 |
| → Re: Chicken Little Is Dead! | squalk <sq@net.invalid> | 2026-05-10 20:58 +0100 |
| → Re: Chicken Little Is Dead! | "Donald J. Trump" <epstein@maga.gop> | 2026-05-11 04:10 +0000 |
| → Re: Chicken Little Is Dead! | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-12 10:19 -0700 |
| Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728 (Re: AI solves probl;em Knuth was/is working on!) (12 replies) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-07 11:58 +0100 |
| → Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-07 12:08 +0100 |
| → Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-03-07 07:21 -0800 |
| → Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-03-07 07:36 -0800 |
| → Only, three decades in software engineering? Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-08 10:00 +0100 |
| → Re: Only, three decades in software engineering? Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-08 10:19 +0100 |
| → Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3] (Was: Only, three decades in software engineering?) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-08 10:34 +0100 |
| → Visual Perception helps reading Matrices, Fractions, etc.. (Re: Amazing Visual Perception, even for ASCII Input [GPT 5.3]) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-08 20:21 +0100 |
| → Re: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here (Re: Terrence Tao: On Jan 4, ChatGPT was able to produce a proof Erdos #728) | x <x@x.net> | 2026-03-08 19:10 -0700 |
| → Biobrain cannot digest "Artificial" in AI (Was: Aristotle: The Era of Vibe Proving is Here) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-03-09 11:21 +0100 |
| → Prolog vendors don't understand Tabling anymore (Re: When Supercomputing discovered BFS) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-04-04 14:10 +0200 |
| → Buddos Waterloo: Checkpoint McCune (Re: Prolog vendors don't understand Tabling anymore (Re: When Supercomputing discovered BFS) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-05-10 16:20 +0200 |
| → Could ISAMORE anti-unification help? (Re: Buddos Waterloo: Checkpoint McCune) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-05-10 16:48 +0200 |
| Re: "Square Cantor Space and theories of potential, unified" | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-09 11:58 -0700 |
| Elmos Fascist Dreams of a 365 Prolog (Re: AI dooms day escape: Güttinger Wald) (1 reply) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-05-09 12:56 +0200 |
| → Even the Buddos are clueless [Did Tarau see Liliputians?] (Re: Elmos Fascist Dreams of a 365 Prolog) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-05-09 15:23 +0200 |
| Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science (48 replies) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-06 10:10 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-06 10:47 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-07 09:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-07 11:08 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 18:32 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-07 19:28 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 07:20 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-08 12:53 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-09 10:50 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-10 18:01 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-10 18:15 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-11 07:41 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-10 23:37 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-11 00:15 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-11 14:23 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-11 06:33 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-11 07:00 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-11 19:52 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-11 17:16 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-11 22:15 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-12 07:36 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-12 00:03 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-12 11:14 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-12 02:22 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-12 13:59 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-12 09:38 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-12 18:46 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-12 10:04 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-12 21:33 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-04-12 11:31 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-12 10:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-04-13 09:46 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-13 08:38 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-13 12:59 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-13 13:06 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-04-17 08:59 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-17 08:56 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-17 08:08 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-17 15:31 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-17 17:34 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-04-18 09:58 +0200 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-18 07:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-18 01:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-13 13:55 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-20 14:06 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-20 19:22 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-02 21:46 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-03 09:06 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-07 10:17 -0700 |
| <Jack> "Ted," like a moth to flame, eternally condemned Ted/Sam (aka "Jack Sovalot," Apostle et al) nymshifter returns to be ever more cursed by GOD in this thread &/or elsewhere ... (3 replies) | HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> | 2025-12-14 21:47 -0500 |
| → <Jack> "Ted," like a moth to flame, eternally condemned Ted/Sam (aka "Jack Sovalot," Apostle et al) nymshifter returns to be ever more cursed by GOD in this thread &/or elsewhere ... | HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> | 2025-12-15 22:40 -0500 |
| → <Jack> "Ted," like a moth to flame, eternally condemned Ted/Sam (aka "Jack Sovalot," Apostle et al) nymshifter returns to be ever more cursed by GOD in this thread &/or elsewhere ... | HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> | 2026-04-18 22:41 -0400 |
| → <Jack> "Ted," like a moth to flame, eternally condemned Ted/Sam (aka "Jack Sovalot," Apostle et al) nymshifter returns to be ever more cursed by GOD in this thread &/or elsewhere ... | HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> | 2026-05-06 00:01 -0400 |
| How to teach Relativity to your dog (9 replies) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-29 18:00 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-29 20:31 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-30 08:55 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-30 16:27 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-30 20:53 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-01 08:42 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-01 09:06 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-01 11:29 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-02 23:12 -0700 |
| → Re: How to teach Relativity to your dog | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-04 23:31 -0700 |
| Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) (11 replies) | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-29 13:53 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-29 14:31 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-29 14:45 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-29 20:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-30 08:54 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-30 09:59 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-30 08:55 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-30 11:42 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-30 15:32 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-30 20:03 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-05-01 08:33 -0700 |
| → Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-05-01 09:05 -0700 |
| Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? (11 replies) | amirjf <amirjfnin@aim.com> | 2026-04-27 17:58 -0400 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | amirjf <amirjfnin@aim.com> | 2026-04-27 18:00 -0400 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> | 2026-04-29 11:21 +0200 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-29 06:40 -0700 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-29 08:34 -0700 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-29 10:01 -0700 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> | 2026-04-29 19:05 +0000 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> | 2026-04-30 03:31 +0200 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> | 2026-04-30 08:12 +0200 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> | 2026-05-01 11:13 +0200 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) | 2026-04-30 12:15 +0200 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) | 2026-04-29 21:51 +0200 |
| A New Science (34 replies) | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> | 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000 |
| → Re: A New Science | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> | 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> | 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> | 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> | 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> | 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> | 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> | 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500 |
| → Re: A New Science | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> | 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200 |
| → Re: A New Science | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> | 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200 |
| → Re: A New Science | Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> | 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> | 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> | 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000 |
| → Re: A New Science | x3 <x@x.net> | 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700 |
| → Re: A New Science | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700 |
| Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? 2 (3 replies) | amirjf <amirjfnin@aim.com> | 2026-04-27 18:05 -0400 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? 2 | ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) | 2026-04-29 20:14 +0000 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? 2 | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> | 2026-04-30 03:36 +0200 |
| → Re: Thoughts on this European Physical Journal paper or at least the abstract? 2 | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> | 2026-04-29 19:49 -0700 |
~Page 1 of ~878 (articles 670859–670942) Older →
csiph-web