Re: A New Science

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject	Re: A New Science
Date	2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<69E70A07.6413@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <10s0tp3$3i8nu$1@dont-email.me> <10s1t3u$3pnj2$1@dont-email.me> <69E52CCF.E1E@ix.netcom.com> <69E55A11.4388@ix.netcom.com> <10s659p$121ds$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 4/19/2026 3:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Jan Panteltje wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>> On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> I invented a New Science.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Take any battery
> >>>>> You have a Plus sign +
> >>>>> You have a Minus sign -
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On which side is the Minus -?
> >>>>> The Left Side or the Right side?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is on the
> >>>> left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, the other
> >>>> going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever?
> >>>
> >>> On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-)
> >>
> >> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside.
> >>
> >> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not
> >> flat, but slightly raised
> >> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing
> >> flower...Positive.
> >>
> >> Elevated means Positive
> >>
> >> Flat (having no height -) is Negative.
> >>
> >> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good.
> >>
> >> A girl with a higher level of flat is good.
> >>
> >> especailly above normal level.
> >>
> >> 36 C PERFECT
> >>
> >> 28 AA is flat.
> >>
> >> But this isn't about batteries or bras..
> >>
> >> it's about
> >>
> >> Right
> >>
> >> Left.
> >>
> >> Good
> >>
> >> Bad
> >>
> >> How about ...dogs? Animals?
> >>
> >> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side?
> >> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side?
> >>
> >> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as people of
> >> course.
> >>
> >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> >>
> >> to the left
> >> it indicates negative emotions;
> >>
> >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> >> to the right
> >> it indicates positive ones.
> >>
> >> (to be continued)
> >
> >
> > The Right side of the brain is...Positive
> >
> > The left side is Negative.
> >
> >
> >
> > Nature agrees with me,
> >
> > That Positive is on the Right and
> >
> > Negative is on the Left.
> >
> >
> > Angel/Devil
> > Good/Bad
> > Positive/Negative
> > Right/Left
> >
> > +/-
> >
> >
> > It agrees with Nature.
> >
> >
> > Are you...Right handed?
> >
> >
> > or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty?
> 
> What about the ambidextrous? ;^)


This is about Positive being on the Right side and

Negative being on the Left side.

ambidextrous people STILL have a right side and a left side.


Science Today and yesterday say there is no right/left to + and -


I'm saying I invented/discovered that Right is Positive, and Left is
negative.





For example:

If you have an angel and a devil on your shoulders...which shoulder is
the devil on???? Right or Left?


A 3 year old can answer that question correctly by now...

(not the 'scientific community)





(to be continued)



 




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700
  Re: A New Science Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000
    Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700
    Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700
    Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700
  Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700
    Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000
      Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
          Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700
            Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700
              Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700
                Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700
                Re: A New Science Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200
                Re: A New Science Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700
              Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700
                Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700
        Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700
  Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700

csiph-web