Re: A New Science

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject	Re: A New Science
Date	2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<69E55A11.4388@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<69E3D803.FB8@ix.netcom.com> <10s0tp3$3i8nu$1@dont-email.me> <10s1t3u$3pnj2$1@dont-email.me> <69E52CCF.E1E@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Jan Panteltje wrote:
> >
> > >"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >> I invented a New Science.
> > >>
> > >> Take any battery
> > >> You have a Plus sign +
> > >> You have a Minus sign -
> > >>
> > >> On which side is the Minus -?
> > >> The Left Side or the Right side?
> > >>
> > >
> > >Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is on the
> > >left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, the other
> > >going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever?
> >
> > On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-)
> 
> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside.
> 
> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not
> flat, but slightly raised
> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing
> flower...Positive.
> 
> Elevated means Positive
> 
> Flat (having no height -) is Negative.
> 
> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good.
> 
> A girl with a higher level of flat is good.
> 
> especailly above normal level.
> 
> 36 C PERFECT
> 
> 28 AA is flat.
> 
> But this isn't about batteries or bras..
> 
> it's about
> 
> Right
> 
> Left.
> 
> Good
> 
> Bad
> 
> How about ...dogs? Animals?
> 
> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side?
> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side?
> 
> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as people of
> course.
> 
> When a dog wag's his tail...
> 
> to the left
> it indicates negative emotions;
> 
> When a dog wag's his tail...
> to the right
> it indicates positive ones.
> 
> (to be continued)


The Right side of the brain is...Positive

The left side is Negative.



Nature agrees with me,

That Positive is on the Right and

Negative is on the Left.


Angel/Devil
Good/Bad
Positive/Negative
Right/Left

+/-


It agrees with Nature.


Are you...Right handed?


or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty?






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700
  Re: A New Science Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000
    Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700
    Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700
    Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700
  Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700
    Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000
      Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
          Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700
            Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700
              Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700
                Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700
                Re: A New Science Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200
                Re: A New Science Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700
              Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700
                Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700
        Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700
  Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700

csiph-web