Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670813

Re: A New Science

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 4/20/2026 10:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/19/2026 3:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan Panteltje wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>> I invented a New Science.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Take any battery
> >>>>>>> You have a Plus sign +
> >>>>>>> You have a Minus sign -
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On which side is the Minus -?
> >>>>>>> The Left Side or the Right side?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is on the
> >>>>>> left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, the other
> >>>>>> going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside.
> >>>>
> >>>> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not
> >>>> flat, but slightly raised
> >>>> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing
> >>>> flower...Positive.
> >>>>
> >>>> Elevated means Positive
> >>>>
> >>>> Flat (having no height -) is Negative.
> >>>>
> >>>> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good.
> >>>>
> >>>> A girl with a higher level of flat is good.
> >>>>
> >>>> especailly above normal level.
> >>>>
> >>>> 36 C PERFECT
> >>>>
> >>>> 28 AA is flat.
> >>>>
> >>>> But this isn't about batteries or bras..
> >>>>
> >>>> it's about
> >>>>
> >>>> Right
> >>>>
> >>>> Left.
> >>>>
> >>>> Good
> >>>>
> >>>> Bad
> >>>>
> >>>> How about ...dogs? Animals?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side?
> >>>> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side?
> >>>>
> >>>> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as people of
> >>>> course.
> >>>>
> >>>> When a dog wag's his tail...
> >>>>
> >>>> to the left
> >>>> it indicates negative emotions;
> >>>>
> >>>> When a dog wag's his tail...
> >>>> to the right
> >>>> it indicates positive ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> (to be continued)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Right side of the brain is...Positive
> >>>
> >>> The left side is Negative.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nature agrees with me,
> >>>
> >>> That Positive is on the Right and
> >>>
> >>> Negative is on the Left.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Angel/Devil
> >>> Good/Bad
> >>> Positive/Negative
> >>> Right/Left
> >>>
> >>> +/-
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It agrees with Nature.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Are you...Right handed?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty?
> >>
> >> What about the ambidextrous? ;^)
> >
> >
> > This is about Positive being on the Right side and
> >
> > Negative being on the Left side.
> >
> > ambidextrous people STILL have a right side and a left side.
> 
> Can an ambidextrous entity sign its name using the left and right hands
> at the same time? So, we have two sigs? ;^)

Would the sigs match? 

I would guess the left hand sig would be a little retarded looking...




> 
> >
> >
> > Science Today and yesterday say there is no right/left to + and -
> >
> >
> > I'm saying I invented/discovered that Right is Positive, and Left is
> > negative.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > If you have an angel and a devil on your shoulders...which shoulder is
> > the devil on???? Right or Left?
> >
> >
> > A 3 year old can answer that question correctly by now...
> >
> > (not the 'scientific community)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > (to be continued)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700
  Re: A New Science Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000
    Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700
    Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700
    Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700
  Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700
    Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000
      Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
          Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700
            Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700
              Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700
                Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700
                Re: A New Science Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200
                Re: A New Science Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700
              Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700
                Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700
        Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700
  Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700

csiph-web