Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670811

Re: A New Science

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >
> > On 4/19/2026 3:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Jan Panteltje wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>>>> On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>> I invented a New Science.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Take any battery
> > >>>>> You have a Plus sign +
> > >>>>> You have a Minus sign -
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On which side is the Minus -?
> > >>>>> The Left Side or the Right side?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is on the
> > >>>> left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, the other
> > >>>> going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever?
> > >>>
> > >>> On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-)
> > >>
> > >> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside.
> > >>
> > >> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not
> > >> flat, but slightly raised
> > >> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing
> > >> flower...Positive.
> > >>
> > >> Elevated means Positive
> > >>
> > >> Flat (having no height -) is Negative.
> > >>
> > >> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good.
> > >>
> > >> A girl with a higher level of flat is good.
> > >>
> > >> especailly above normal level.
> > >>
> > >> 36 C PERFECT
> > >>
> > >> 28 AA is flat.
> > >>
> > >> But this isn't about batteries or bras..
> > >>
> > >> it's about
> > >>
> > >> Right
> > >>
> > >> Left.
> > >>
> > >> Good
> > >>
> > >> Bad
> > >>
> > >> How about ...dogs? Animals?
> > >>
> > >> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side?
> > >> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side?
> > >>
> > >> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as people of
> > >> course.
> > >>
> > >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> > >>
> > >> to the left
> > >> it indicates negative emotions;
> > >>
> > >> When a dog wag's his tail...
> > >> to the right
> > >> it indicates positive ones.
> > >>
> > >> (to be continued)
> > >
> > >
> > > The Right side of the brain is...Positive
> > >
> > > The left side is Negative.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Nature agrees with me,
> > >
> > > That Positive is on the Right and
> > >
> > > Negative is on the Left.
> > >
> > >
> > > Angel/Devil
> > > Good/Bad
> > > Positive/Negative
> > > Right/Left
> > >
> > > +/-
> > >
> > >
> > > It agrees with Nature.
> > >
> > >
> > > Are you...Right handed?
> > >
> > >
> > > or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty?
> >
> > What about the ambidextrous? ;^)
> 
> This is about Positive being on the Right side and
> 
> Negative being on the Left side.
> 
> ambidextrous people STILL have a right side and a left side.
> 
> Science Today and yesterday say there is no right/left to + and -
> 
> I'm saying I invented/discovered that Right is Positive, and Left is
> negative.

This is one of those instances in which it agrees with Nature, but...

the 'scientific community' DISAGREES with Nature.

A conscious bias of the 'scientific community'.


(to be continued)






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 12:14 -0700
  Re: A New Science Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-04-18 20:11 +0000
    Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:55 -0700
    Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700
    Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 16:47 -0700
  Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 14:40 -0700
    Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-19 06:35 +0000
      Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-19 15:41 -0700
          Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 14:19 -0700
            Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 22:24 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 08:20 -0700
              Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 11:42 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 12:02 -0700
                Re: A New Science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 12:16 -0700
              Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 13:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-22 11:06 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 11:09 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:07 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:18 -0700
                Re: A New Science Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2026-04-29 23:18 -0500
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:21 +0200
                Re: A New Science Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-05-01 04:22 +0200
                Re: A New Science Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-04-30 20:44 -0700
              Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-21 15:32 -0700
                Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-22 10:31 -0700
                Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:49 -0700
                Re: A New Science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-24 08:46 -0700
        Re: A New Science Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: A New Science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-19 13:34 -0700
        Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 22:57 -0700
  Re: A New Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 14:41 -0700

csiph-web