Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > de.sci.electronics > #329848

Re: Duracell

From Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz>
Newsgroups de.sci.electronics
Subject Re: Duracell
Date 2022-12-04 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <tmhv5p$l44q$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <lqo85j-539.ln1@criseis.ruhr.de> <tlt85g$bem6$1@solani.org> <tmgf0q$3e6pc$1@dont-email.me> <xn0nq6j545eo5j9002@news.heirich.name> <638C4E73.A942B6D0@Berger-Odenthal.De>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/04/2022 08:38, Axel Berger wrote:
> Peter Heirich wrote:
>> 9V-Block zur Versotgung, so etwas ist mir noch nie ausgelaufen,
> 
> Mir schon. Mehrfach.
> 

Beide Aussagen heben sich gegeneinander auf, und sind demnach wertlos.
Es müssen einfach deutlich mehr Daten gegeben werden.
Ansonsten wird nur ein Mythos immer weiter angefeuert.

Jedoch das Wort 'Mythos' sollte ich in dieser NG nicht verwenden - es wird
nicht verstanden, obwohl bereits (kurz) definiert.
Kann auch sein, daß der Definitionsinhalt nicht (richtig) verstanden wird.


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Helmut Schellong   var@schellong.biz
http://www.schellong.de/c.htm  http://www.schellong.de/c2x.htm  http://www.schellong.de/c_padding_bits.htm
http://www.schellong.de/htm/bishmnk.htm  http://www.schellong.de/htm/rpar.bish.html  http://www.schellong.de/htm/sieger.bish.html
http://www.schellong.de/htm/audio_proj.htm  http://www.schellong.de/htm/audio_unsinn.htm  http://www.schellong.de/htm/tuner.htm
http://www.schellong.de/htm/string.htm  http://www.schellong.de/htm/string.c.html  http://www.schellong.de/htm/deutsche_bahn.htm
http://www.schellong.de/htm/schaltungen.htm  http://www.schellong.de/htm/math87.htm  http://www.schellong.de/htm/dragon.c.html

Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-25 21:50 +0100
  Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-11-25 22:03 +0100
  Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-25 23:13 +0000
    Re: Duracell olaf <olaf@criseis.ruhr.de> - 2022-11-26 07:37 +0100
      Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 15:34 +0100
        Re: Duracell Leo Baumann <ib@leobaumann.de> - 2022-11-26 15:42 +0100
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 16:45 +0100
        Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-26 15:47 +0100
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 16:06 +0100
            Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:22 +0100
              Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 00:41 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 21:49 +0100
                Re: Duracell Andreas Fecht <forum@aftec.de> - 2022-11-28 22:54 +0100
                Re: Duracell Frank Scheffski <usenet@alles-moppelkotze.de> - 2022-12-02 21:06 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-03 18:28 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-05 09:16 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:30 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-04 12:48 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-04 12:52 +0100
                Re: Duracell Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@gmx.net> - 2022-12-04 15:12 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 21:11 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 22:12 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 23:19 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-30 09:14 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 15:45 +0100
                Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-12-01 12:52 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-01 15:00 +0100
                Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-12-01 15:25 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-01 16:57 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:33 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-03 23:48 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-28 22:14 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 23:29 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-30 09:32 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:46 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-30 16:20 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 17:45 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 23:46 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 16:10 +0100
                Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-12-01 13:01 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-01 15:56 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-04 13:11 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 22:22 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-05 16:50 +0100
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-28 13:46 +0100
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-28 13:52 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:37 +0100
            Re: Duracell Andreas Bockelmann <xotzil@gmx.de> - 2022-11-29 10:58 +0100
              Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-29 12:39 +0100
                Re: Duracell Andreas Bockelmann <xotzil@gmx.de> - 2022-11-29 13:00 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-30 14:18 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 16:24 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 17:37 +0100
                Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-11-29 12:52 +0000
          Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-26 17:31 +0100
          Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-26 19:57 +0100
            Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 20:40 +0100
              Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:28 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 00:58 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:49 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 00:26 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-05 13:19 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-05 17:02 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-06 11:06 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-06 14:53 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 12:07 +0100
                Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-12-04 14:07 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-04 20:02 +0100
            Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-27 13:56 +0100
              Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-27 14:18 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-28 09:08 +0100
                Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-28 13:17 +0100
                Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-28 16:02 +0000
                Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-28 18:57 +0100
                Re: Duracell Peter Heirich <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-28 20:11 +0000
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 23:08 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 23:56 +0100
                Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 11:21 +0100
                Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-29 11:29 +0100
                Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-29 17:12 +0000
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 21:21 +0100
                Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-28 22:55 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gregor Szaktilla <spam0.sz@ktilla.de> - 2022-11-28 19:21 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-29 07:48 +0100
                Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 10:51 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-28 21:29 +0100
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-27 18:00 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-27 20:46 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-27 21:15 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gregor Szaktilla <spam0.sz@ktilla.de> - 2022-11-27 21:19 +0100
                Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-28 07:20 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 21:15 +0100
              Re: Duracell Olaf Schultz <o.schultz@enhydralutris.de> - 2022-11-27 18:06 +0100
                Re: Duracell Bernd Laengerich <Bernd.Laengerich@web.de> - 2022-11-28 08:36 +0100
              Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-27 20:42 +0100
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:12 +0100
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 13:12 +0100
            Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-29 13:53 +0000
              Re: Duracell Stefan Wiens <s.wi@gmx.net> - 2022-11-29 16:09 +0100
              Re: Duracell Manuel Reimer <manuel.nulldevice@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-11-29 18:27 +0100
              Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 19:04 +0100
              Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-29 19:11 +0000
              Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-29 20:35 +0100
                Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-11 00:16 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-11 12:59 +0100
                Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-11 16:34 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-11 20:30 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-11 23:43 +0100
                Re: Duracell Peter Heirich <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-12 01:03 +0000
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 18:39 +0100
                Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-13 00:29 +0000
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-13 06:53 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-13 21:29 +0100
                Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-13 23:06 +0000
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-14 01:15 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-12 15:24 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-12 17:29 +0100
                Re: Duracell Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-12-13 11:26 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 16:10 +0100
                Re: Duracell Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-12-13 20:45 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 22:36 +0100
                Re: Duracell Heiner Hass <heinerh@gmx.net> - 2022-12-14 00:41 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-14 14:02 +0100
                Re: Duracell Karl Davis <me@privacy.org> - 2022-12-14 14:24 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-15 19:36 +0100
                Re: Duracell Sieghard Schicktanz <Sieghard.Schicktanz@SchS.de> - 2022-12-15 20:41 +0100
                Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-14 08:29 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-14 16:44 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 18:42 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 18:46 +0100
                Re: Duracell Jochen Pawletta <jochen@hin.de> - 2022-12-12 19:52 +0000
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-12 20:54 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 00:23 +0100
                Re: Duracell Karl Davis <me@privacy.org> - 2022-12-13 10:11 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 15:44 +0100
                Re: Duracell Karl Davis <me@privacy.org> - 2022-12-13 18:15 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 19:48 +0100
                Re: Duracell Sieghard Schicktanz <Sieghard.Schicktanz@SchS.de> - 2022-12-13 23:42 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 00:39 +0100
                Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-12 13:38 +0000
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:23 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-30 17:44 +0100
                Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-30 17:50 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-30 17:58 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 18:01 +0100
                Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-30 18:20 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-30 19:48 +0100
                Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-11-30 20:00 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:59 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 12:07 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 12:53 +0100
                Re: Duracell Rupert Haselbeck <mein-rest-muell@gmx.de> - 2022-12-04 15:10 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 21:07 +0100
                Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-04 20:36 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 22:21 +0100
                Re: Duracell "Wolfgang Allinger" <all2001@spambog.com> - 2022-12-04 14:47 -0300
                Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-04 22:14 +0000
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-05 06:43 +0100
                Re: Duracell "Wolfgang Allinger" <all2001@spambog.com> - 2022-12-05 05:28 -0300
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-04 20:04 +0100
                Re: Duracell Thomas Einzel <usenet-2022@einzel.de> - 2022-12-04 12:21 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 17:59 +0100
            Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-04 19:57 +0100
              Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 22:32 +0100
        Re: Duracell Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-11-26 16:47 +0100
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 17:07 +0100
            Re: Duracell Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-11-26 17:09 +0100
          Re: Duracell Bernd Laengerich <Bernd.Laengerich@web.de> - 2022-11-26 21:13 +0100
        Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-26 17:56 +0100
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 18:16 +0100
        Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 18:19 +0100
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 18:35 +0100
            Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 18:39 +0100
              Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 19:45 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 19:53 +0100
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 20:22 +0100
        Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-29 13:24 +0000
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-29 15:07 +0100
            Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:31 +0100
              Re: Duracell Rupert Haselbeck <mein-rest-muell@gmx.de> - 2022-11-29 16:50 +0100
                Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-11-29 17:37 +0100
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 18:02 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 13:06 +0100
              Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-29 17:59 +0000
                Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-29 22:47 +0100
              Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-29 21:50 +0100
          Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-03 13:42 +0000
            Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-03 18:30 +0100
            Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 11:49 +0100
              Re: Duracell Olaf Schultz <o.schultz@enhydralutris.de> - 2022-12-04 16:43 +0100
        Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:27 +0100
          Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-03 22:33 +0000
            Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-12-04 08:38 +0100
              Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 12:10 +0100
            Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 11:57 +0100
  Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:14 +0100
    Re: Duracell Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2022-11-26 17:00 +0100
      Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 17:29 +0100
        Re: Duracell Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2022-11-26 18:03 +0100
          Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 18:22 +0100
      Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:37 +0100
    Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-26 18:05 +0100
      Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-26 18:22 +0100
        Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-26 19:42 +0100
    Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 18:16 +0100
      Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:42 +0100
        Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-28 01:41 +0100
          Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-28 22:52 +0100
            Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 06:47 +0100
              Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-11-29 10:26 +0000
                Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 11:34 +0100
                Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:51 +0100
                Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-12-01 13:05 +0000
                Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 23:10 +0100
            Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 11:19 +0100
            Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 13:23 +0100
              Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 14:57 +0100
        Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-28 06:52 +0100
    Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:32 +0100
  Re: Duracell Manuel Reimer <manuel.nulldevice@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-11-29 18:15 +0100
    Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 19:18 +0100
      Re: Duracell Manuel Reimer <manuel.nulldevice@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-12-02 16:38 +0100
        Re: Duracell Heinz-Juergen Kronemeyer <meierdrei@protonmail.com> - 2022-12-02 17:15 +0100
        Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-02 19:49 +0100
          Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-12-03 03:07 +0100
            Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-03 17:26 +0100
    Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-29 19:43 +0000
      Re: Duracell Olaf Schultz <o.schultz@enhydralutris.de> - 2022-11-29 20:58 +0100
        Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 21:01 +0100
          Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 13:10 +0100
        Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-30 01:23 +0000
          Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-30 06:55 +0100
        Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-30 08:07 +0100
  Re: Duracell Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-12 10:11 -0800
    Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 19:47 +0100
      Re: Duracell Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-12 11:08 -0800
        [OT] Hot Chili (was: Duracell) Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 21:25 +0100
          Re: [OT] Hot Chili Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-12 16:06 -0800
            Re: [OT] Hot Chili Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-13 09:35 +0100
              Re: [OT] Hot Chili Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-16 12:01 -0800
        Re: Duracell "Wolfgang Allinger" <all2001@spambog.com> - 2022-12-13 12:59 -0300
          Re: Duracell [OT] Hot Chili Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-16 12:16 -0800

csiph-web