Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > de.sci.electronics > #329613
| From | Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | de.sci.electronics |
| Subject | Re: Duracell |
| Date | 2022-11-29 13:23 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <tm4tk4$28v2v$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tlslhg$1b3ar$2@dont-email.me> <tlthh0$3ct$2@news.bawue.net> <tm0p46$25v19$10@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <juiecsF7878U3@mid.individual.net> <tm3aj8$2eme4$2@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
Marte Schwarz schrieb: > Ich bezweifle mittlerweile, dass Kalilauge überhaupt etwas dem Kupfer tut. IMHO ist es erst die Essigessenz, die dem Kupfer zusetzt. Kalilauge löst allemal Kupferoxid, nicht aber das Kupfer. Deshalb > ist es in der Kupferverarbeitung beliebt zum Entfetten von Kupfer (und anderen Metallen). Was aus der Zelle langsam raussifft, wird schon Kalilauge sein. Aber bis das zur Platine gekrochen ist, ist längst Karbonat entstanden. Warum sollte es sonst schäumen bei Kontakt mit Säure? Die Platinen werden vorallem durch Elektrochemie gekillt, egal was da an leitendem Schleim drauf ist. Passiert auch mit Elkos und allem möglichen. -- mfg Rolf Bombach
Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-25 21:50 +0100
Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-11-25 22:03 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-25 23:13 +0000
Re: Duracell olaf <olaf@criseis.ruhr.de> - 2022-11-26 07:37 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 15:34 +0100
Re: Duracell Leo Baumann <ib@leobaumann.de> - 2022-11-26 15:42 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 16:45 +0100
Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-26 15:47 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 16:06 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:22 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 00:41 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 21:49 +0100
Re: Duracell Andreas Fecht <forum@aftec.de> - 2022-11-28 22:54 +0100
Re: Duracell Frank Scheffski <usenet@alles-moppelkotze.de> - 2022-12-02 21:06 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-03 18:28 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-05 09:16 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:30 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-04 12:48 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-04 12:52 +0100
Re: Duracell Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeuerle@gmx.net> - 2022-12-04 15:12 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 21:11 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 22:12 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 23:19 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-30 09:14 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 15:45 +0100
Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-12-01 12:52 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-01 15:00 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-12-01 15:25 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-01 16:57 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:33 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-03 23:48 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-28 22:14 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 23:29 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-30 09:32 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:46 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-30 16:20 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 17:45 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 23:46 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 16:10 +0100
Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-12-01 13:01 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-01 15:56 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-04 13:11 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 22:22 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-05 16:50 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-28 13:46 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-28 13:52 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:37 +0100
Re: Duracell Andreas Bockelmann <xotzil@gmx.de> - 2022-11-29 10:58 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-29 12:39 +0100
Re: Duracell Andreas Bockelmann <xotzil@gmx.de> - 2022-11-29 13:00 +0100
Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-30 14:18 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-30 16:24 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 17:37 +0100
Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-11-29 12:52 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-26 17:31 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-26 19:57 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 20:40 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:28 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 00:58 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 00:26 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-12-05 13:19 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-05 17:02 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-06 11:06 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-06 14:53 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 12:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-12-04 14:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-04 20:02 +0100
Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-27 13:56 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-27 14:18 +0100
Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-28 09:08 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-28 13:17 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-28 16:02 +0000
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-28 18:57 +0100
Re: Duracell Peter Heirich <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-28 20:11 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 23:08 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-28 23:56 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 11:21 +0100
Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-29 11:29 +0100
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-29 17:12 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 21:21 +0100
Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-28 22:55 +0100
Re: Duracell Gregor Szaktilla <spam0.sz@ktilla.de> - 2022-11-28 19:21 +0100
Re: Duracell Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2022-11-29 07:48 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 10:51 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-28 21:29 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-27 18:00 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-27 20:46 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-27 21:15 +0100
Re: Duracell Gregor Szaktilla <spam0.sz@ktilla.de> - 2022-11-27 21:19 +0100
Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-28 07:20 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-28 21:15 +0100
Re: Duracell Olaf Schultz <o.schultz@enhydralutris.de> - 2022-11-27 18:06 +0100
Re: Duracell Bernd Laengerich <Bernd.Laengerich@web.de> - 2022-11-28 08:36 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-27 20:42 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:12 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 13:12 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-29 13:53 +0000
Re: Duracell Stefan Wiens <s.wi@gmx.net> - 2022-11-29 16:09 +0100
Re: Duracell Manuel Reimer <manuel.nulldevice@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-11-29 18:27 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 19:04 +0100
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-29 19:11 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-29 20:35 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-11 00:16 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-11 12:59 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-11 16:34 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-11 20:30 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-11 23:43 +0100
Re: Duracell Peter Heirich <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-12 01:03 +0000
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 18:39 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-12 15:24 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-12 17:29 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 18:42 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 18:46 +0100
Re: Duracell Jochen Pawletta <jochen@hin.de> - 2022-12-12 19:52 +0000
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-12 20:54 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 00:23 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-13 00:39 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-12 13:38 +0000
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:23 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-30 17:44 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-30 17:50 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-30 17:58 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 18:01 +0100
Re: Duracell Bernd Mayer <beambamboom@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-30 18:20 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-30 19:48 +0100
Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-11-30 20:00 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:59 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 12:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 12:53 +0100
Re: Duracell Rupert Haselbeck <mein-rest-muell@gmx.de> - 2022-12-04 15:10 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 21:07 +0100
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-04 20:36 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 22:21 +0100
Re: Duracell "Wolfgang Allinger" <all2001@spambog.com> - 2022-12-04 14:47 -0300
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-04 22:14 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-05 06:43 +0100
Re: Duracell "Wolfgang Allinger" <all2001@spambog.com> - 2022-12-05 05:28 -0300
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-04 20:04 +0100
Re: Duracell Thomas Einzel <usenet-2022@einzel.de> - 2022-12-04 12:21 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 17:59 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-04 19:57 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 22:32 +0100
Re: Duracell Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-11-26 16:47 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 17:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-11-26 17:09 +0100
Re: Duracell Bernd Laengerich <Bernd.Laengerich@web.de> - 2022-11-26 21:13 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-26 17:56 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 18:16 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 18:19 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 18:35 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 18:39 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 19:45 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 19:53 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 20:22 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-29 13:24 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-29 15:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:31 +0100
Re: Duracell Rupert Haselbeck <mein-rest-muell@gmx.de> - 2022-11-29 16:50 +0100
Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-11-29 17:37 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 18:02 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 13:06 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-11-29 17:59 +0000
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-29 22:47 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-29 21:50 +0100
Re: Duracell Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> - 2022-12-03 13:42 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-12-03 18:30 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 11:49 +0100
Re: Duracell Olaf Schultz <o.schultz@enhydralutris.de> - 2022-12-04 16:43 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 22:27 +0100
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-12-03 22:33 +0000
Re: Duracell Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2022-12-04 08:38 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-12-04 12:10 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-04 11:57 +0100
Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:14 +0100
Re: Duracell Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2022-11-26 17:00 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 17:29 +0100
Re: Duracell Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2022-11-26 18:03 +0100
Re: Duracell Helmut Schellong <rip@schellong.biz> - 2022-11-26 18:22 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:37 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-26 18:05 +0100
Re: Duracell Frank Müller <dw2fm@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-26 18:22 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-26 19:42 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-26 18:16 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:42 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-28 01:41 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-28 22:52 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 06:47 +0100
Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-11-29 10:26 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 11:34 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 12:51 +0100
Re: Duracell Michael Schwingen <news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de> - 2022-12-01 13:05 +0000
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-03 23:10 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 11:19 +0100
Re: Duracell Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 13:23 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 14:57 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-28 06:52 +0100
Re: Duracell Marte Schwarz <marte.schwarz@gmx.de> - 2022-11-27 23:32 +0100
Re: Duracell Manuel Reimer <manuel.nulldevice@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-11-29 18:15 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-11-29 19:18 +0100
Re: Duracell Manuel Reimer <manuel.nulldevice@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-12-02 16:38 +0100
Re: Duracell Heinz-Juergen Kronemeyer <meierdrei@protonmail.com> - 2022-12-02 17:15 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-02 19:49 +0100
Re: Duracell Hanno Foest <hurga-news2@tigress.com> - 2022-12-03 03:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-12-03 17:26 +0100
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-29 19:43 +0000
Re: Duracell Olaf Schultz <o.schultz@enhydralutris.de> - 2022-11-29 20:58 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-29 21:01 +0100
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-11-30 13:10 +0100
Re: Duracell "Peter Heirich" <talk.usenet@info21.heirich.name> - 2022-11-30 01:23 +0000
Re: Duracell Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> - 2022-11-30 06:55 +0100
Re: Duracell Gerald Eіscher <Spamer@fahr-zur-Hoelle.org> - 2022-11-30 08:07 +0100
Re: Duracell Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-12 10:11 -0800
Re: Duracell Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 19:47 +0100
Re: Duracell Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2022-12-12 11:08 -0800
[OT] Hot Chili (was: Duracell) Volker Bartheld <news2022@bartheld.net> - 2022-12-12 21:25 +0100
csiph-web