Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61095 > unrolled thread
| Started by | root <NoEMail@home.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-11-19 17:09 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-11-20 18:53 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 842 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Joy of this, Joy of that root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2024-11-19 17:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 00:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2024-11-20 02:33 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 02:52 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-20 04:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-20 03:37 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-20 15:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-20 16:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-21 02:20 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-21 08:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2025-01-14 12:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-21 13:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-11-21 20:19 -0700
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 05:51 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-22 23:57 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 05:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-23 20:23 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-24 02:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-24 00:16 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-24 05:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-23 19:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> - 2024-11-23 13:46 -0700
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-24 14:33 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-24 05:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-24 14:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-24 14:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-24 17:00 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-24 22:07 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 02:12 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-25 10:55 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-25 12:04 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-25 22:20 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 23:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-26 10:10 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-26 10:24 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-26 13:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-11-26 09:15 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-27 09:34 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-26 18:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-26 21:58 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-27 01:38 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-27 01:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-27 10:10 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-27 11:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-27 19:12 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 09:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-25 21:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-27 01:39 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-27 22:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-27 22:46 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-28 05:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-28 02:56 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-28 08:52 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 04:48 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-29 19:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 05:06 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-29 18:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-30 00:16 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-30 06:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 06:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 09:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-30 23:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-01 04:19 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 11:21 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-01 16:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-02 23:28 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 18:41 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-02 00:37 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-01 20:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-02 23:57 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 21:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-02 23:58 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:51 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-05 01:03 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 10:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 01:13 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 07:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 10:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 02:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 22:59 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:32 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 16:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:39 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:35 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:43 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 03:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:33 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 18:19 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 19:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 11:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 19:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 21:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-08 04:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 03:05 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:26 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-07 10:15 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 16:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-07 12:44 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:30 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 20:16 +0000
Re: The Joy Of Democracy Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-07 22:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 00:03 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:19 +0100
Re: The Joy Of Democracy Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-07 22:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 22:41 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:29 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 22:40 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 04:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 10:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 23:27 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:40 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 02:05 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 13:39 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 19:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:22 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 21:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 20:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 22:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 22:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:07 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 19:52 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 03:38 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:49 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 04:56 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-13 02:20 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:38 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:42 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:41 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 20:01 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:48 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:40 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:34 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-14 05:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 13:08 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:51 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:15 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 11:39 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 20:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 03:07 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 08:13 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-13 01:55 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 07:53 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:45 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:38 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 20:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 11:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-05 20:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 23:33 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-07 07:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 02:44 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-29 21:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-30 00:19 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-30 06:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-01 03:39 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-01 09:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 11:08 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-01 20:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-02 07:13 +1000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-01 23:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 01:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-28 05:52 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-28 02:47 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-25 19:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-11-26 07:09 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-26 19:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 09:02 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 18:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-02 23:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-03 00:59 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-03 00:53 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-24 22:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-25 08:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-25 10:58 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-21 17:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 08:10 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-20 16:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-20 17:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-20 19:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-20 21:05 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-11-20 23:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 23:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-11-21 01:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-21 02:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-11-22 20:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-21 08:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-21 10:45 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-21 23:04 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-21 20:31 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-22 03:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-22 01:25 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-22 18:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 21:04 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-22 10:35 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-22 13:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-22 19:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 21:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 07:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-22 23:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 00:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 01:08 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 01:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 08:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 23:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-24 00:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-24 21:19 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-24 22:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-24 05:01 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-24 21:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-24 22:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-25 11:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-25 21:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 01:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-25 10:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 19:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-25 23:21 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-26 19:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-26 21:59 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 15:21 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-02 23:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 03:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-24 19:35 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-25 00:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 01:41 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-25 06:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 21:50 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-25 10:56 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 21:58 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-26 04:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-26 10:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-27 01:58 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-27 10:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-27 19:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-27 21:26 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-28 19:59 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-28 21:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-27 23:12 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-28 05:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-28 02:22 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-28 08:38 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 03:18 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 13:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-28 11:04 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 18:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-28 21:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 04:24 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 13:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 23:42 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 06:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 09:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 12:02 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-29 18:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 23:44 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 03:21 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-29 10:29 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 13:24 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-29 18:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 21:01 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-29 22:51 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 00:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 11:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-29 22:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 09:24 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-29 18:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-29 22:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 11:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 23:31 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 07:00 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 12:05 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 13:19 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-29 18:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 21:04 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-29 22:54 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 00:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-29 22:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 00:12 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 09:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 12:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 18:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 21:56 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 01:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 11:18 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 18:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 22:11 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 13:19 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 02:21 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 10:04 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 21:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 01:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 11:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 18:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:59 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-05 00:35 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 10:22 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-05 21:19 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 09:56 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 18:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:51 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 02:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:27 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:27 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:20 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 22:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 11:54 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 18:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:23 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 02:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 21:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:29 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 22:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:02 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 19:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:03 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-08 09:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-07 10:18 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 16:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-07 12:48 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:34 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:56 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:39 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 04:52 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 07:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 15:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 14:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 21:37 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:34 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 21:16 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 20:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 14:08 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 14:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:49 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 00:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:35 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:10 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 14:07 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 14:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:47 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:10 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 14:05 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 17:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-05 01:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 10:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 10:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 10:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 18:38 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 20:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 22:15 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 02:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-02 07:23 +1000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 10:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 15:04 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 20:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 15:06 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 14:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 21:38 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 03:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:00 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 21:18 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 20:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 00:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-04 17:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 00:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:35 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 19:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 22:01 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 11:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 18:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 21:40 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 02:59 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 10:08 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 18:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 21:21 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 20:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 00:24 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:33 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-04 17:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:27 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:21 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 14:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 14:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:50 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 07:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 17:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:53 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 00:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:32 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 21:19 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 11:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 18:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 21:54 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 01:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-01 03:50 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 10:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 11:15 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 10:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 19:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 11:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-01 10:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 18:32 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-01 18:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 22:11 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 19:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 22:14 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-02 01:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 10:26 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 10:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 15:03 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 14:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 21:36 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-04 04:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 11:10 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 14:07 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 14:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:47 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 19:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 22:00 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-05 01:51 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 10:31 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 09:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 13:17 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 01:51 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 10:11 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 18:23 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 19:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 21:40 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:50 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:10 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 22:57 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 01:04 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 00:55 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 08:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:12 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:50 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:33 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:29 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 01:48 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 07:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 10:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 18:18 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:50 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 18:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:10 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 20:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 02:56 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 20:51 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:20 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:57 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:07 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 22:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 11:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 01:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 11:59 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 21:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:33 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:41 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 21:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:59 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 22:12 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:05 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:56 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:35 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:11 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 02:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:04 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 21:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:26 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 11:56 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 21:51 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:58 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:14 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 19:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:04 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:57 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:21 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 19:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:37 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 19:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:36 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 03:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:10 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 22:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:43 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:20 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 19:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:03 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 01:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:03 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 01:11 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:21 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:08 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:31 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 01:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:13 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 20:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:57 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:03 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:40 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 19:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 12:11 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 19:28 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 10:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 20:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:54 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 11:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:02 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 18:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:01 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 19:59 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 00:33 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:05 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:04 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:27 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 11:17 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:28 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:07 +0100
Re: Joy of Translation Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 12:33 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-11 15:16 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 01:15 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-12 05:06 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:24 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:37 +0100
Re: Joy of Translation rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:15 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:33 +0100
Re: Joy of Translation rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 01:47 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:20 +0100
Re: Joy of Translation rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 20:50 +0000
Re: Joy of Translation D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:00 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 19:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 11:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:21 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 19:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:35 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:18 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 18:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 02:41 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:00 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:45 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 18:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 00:28 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 12:24 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:42 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 17:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 22:57 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 22:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 11:51 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 11:59 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 17:39 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 16:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 22:48 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 22:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 11:48 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 12:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:50 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 11:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:39 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 21:26 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 22:38 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:43 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:44 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 21:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 00:31 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:13 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 12:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 19:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 12:11 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:49 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 11:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:38 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 00:19 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 15:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 03:02 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:47 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:42 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 21:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-07 02:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 00:32 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-02 10:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-02 15:02 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-03 00:30 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 10:13 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-03 21:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 01:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:37 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 18:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:56 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-04 00:44 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 11:12 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 07:58 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:52 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-05 01:37 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-05 07:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-06 04:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 05:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 10:29 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-05 01:28 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-05 07:34 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 01:31 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 20:33 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 00:19 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 05:37 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 13:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 19:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 23:43 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 05:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:43 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:30 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:25 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-04 18:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 21:55 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-05 01:42 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-05 07:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-06 01:40 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 08:00 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 10:30 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 07:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2024-12-06 03:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 05:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 10:00 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:04 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 18:09 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 19:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 21:39 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-06 21:15 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 11:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 09:58 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-06 13:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-06 18:24 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2024-12-06 17:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 19:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-03 00:20 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-29 22:50 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-29 23:50 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-30 06:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-30 09:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-30 11:57 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-01 04:11 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 11:21 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-01 18:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-03 00:10 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-01 03:54 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-01 11:19 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 12:35 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-28 11:03 +0100
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 02:41 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 02:11 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-24 10:25 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-24 21:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 01:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 02:41 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-25 09:07 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 22:59 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-26 04:43 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-26 05:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-26 08:49 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-26 05:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 15:43 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 10:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-03 19:23 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 02:33 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-25 19:54 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-25 23:58 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-23 02:29 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 08:52 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-23 19:28 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 21:02 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-21 19:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-21 23:14 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-21 23:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-22 01:51 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-22 10:34 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-22 10:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-22 12:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-22 18:53 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-11-22 20:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 07:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 07:44 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 09:05 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 19:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-23 19:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 10:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:34 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 19:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-24 12:46 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-24 20:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-25 08:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-25 21:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-26 08:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-26 21:22 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-26 21:30 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-26 21:36 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> - 2024-11-26 17:55 -0700
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-27 01:48 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-27 12:05 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-27 17:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-27 18:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 08:35 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 09:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-28 14:19 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 18:19 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 10:11 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-27 18:32 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-28 09:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-29 10:01 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-27 18:51 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-27 04:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> - 2024-11-26 22:38 -0700
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-27 09:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-27 22:06 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-27 23:59 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-28 00:57 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:38 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 20:58 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 07:09 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 07:45 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 19:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-11-25 04:40 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-25 06:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-11-25 18:20 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 09:10 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-11-23 19:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-23 20:50 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-23 01:28 -0500
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 20:55 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 21:47 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 14:09 -0800
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 23:39 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-21 01:27 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-21 02:16 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-21 04:31 +0000
Re: Joy of this, Joy of that rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-11-20 18:53 +0000
Page 7 of 43 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 43 Next page →
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-06 22:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1x2dnY_OHe9kXs76nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #61770 |
On 12/6/24 4:12 AM, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > >> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 01:13:40 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Fedora still seems ok - as far as Fedora is OK. The >>> Manjaro/Endeavour/Arch end is still OK. Never a fan of Slack, but, >>> who knows ...... gotta keep evading suckitude. >> >> Slack was my first distro. Download in pieces and copy to about 40 >> floppies. > > Was my first distro too. After that, I can't remember if I went to > Mandrake or if I had netbsd in between. Was NetBSD out in that time-frame ??? >> I've got Fedora 40 on one machine. Not bad but it updates frequently >> compared to Ubuntu or Debian. >> >> Debian us on my work machine. I wanted stability, not cutting edge. >>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-07 11:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <41c06973-7ee1-21b0-a5a3-af5e747a480f@example.net> |
| In reply to | #61796 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/6/24 4:12 AM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 01:13:40 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> Fedora still seems ok - as far as Fedora is OK. The >>>> Manjaro/Endeavour/Arch end is still OK. Never a fan of Slack, but, >>>> who knows ...... gotta keep evading suckitude. >>> >>> Slack was my first distro. Download in pieces and copy to about 40 >>> floppies. >> >> Was my first distro too. After that, I can't remember if I went to Mandrake >> or if I had netbsd in between. > > Was NetBSD out in that time-frame ??? Let me have a look... 1993, and I think this was possibly between 94 to 95 (not sure) so yes, seems like it. > >>> I've got Fedora 40 on one machine. Not bad but it updates frequently >>> compared to Ubuntu or Debian. >>> >>> Debian us on my work machine. I wanted stability, not cutting edge. >>> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-06 22:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1x2dnYzOHe8-Xs76nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #61761 |
On 12/6/24 2:43 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 01:13:40 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Fedora still seems ok - as far as Fedora is OK. The >> Manjaro/Endeavour/Arch end is still OK. Never a fan of Slack, but, >> who knows ...... gotta keep evading suckitude. > > Slack was my first distro. Download in pieces and copy to about 40 > floppies. Hey - REMEMBER that !!! :-) MIGHT still have those disks ... NOT sure if it had 'X' ... that might have been the early early RH I bought a little later. I do remember having to tweak a LOT of config files and download a lot of drivers just to get 'X' to understand I had a mouse and keyboard. Ah, the Bad Old Days :-) > I've got Fedora 40 on one machine. Not bad but it updates frequently > compared to Ubuntu or Debian. > > Debian us on my work machine. I wanted stability, not cutting edge. Therein my gripe with Deb now ... it really really smells like they hired a bunch of Canonical rejects. Deb was supposed to be The Foundation, solid and stolid, no BS, stick with What Works. But the LATEST one especially ..... ! NOW it's not Deb, just another 'Buntu I'll stick with previous versions for as long as possible. If they don't backtrack and mend their ways then it's Fedora or Arch derivs forever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-07 04:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lri2fsFigauU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #61795 |
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 22:40:18 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > But the LATEST one especially ..... ! My Debian machine is still Bullseye. Raspberry Pi OS is based on Debian Bookworm but it's stripped down.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-06 10:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <eb4e5862-c8fe-d4b1-3433-39e6cecbe42c@example.net> |
| In reply to | #61756 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/5/24 4:25 AM, D wrote: >> >> >>> the suggestions, check a few boxes ... saves like >>> an hour. Ever set up RAID The Hard Way ? With Yast >> >> Yast? Are you another opensuse user? I thought I was the only one! > > USED to be my fave from LONG back. Found a distro > in WalMart of all places. Had used Red Hat, but > SUSE (now OpenSUSE) had many advanced tools that > made the long and tedious NOT so long and tedious. It's been rock solid for me for at least a decade. More probably. I had a consulting gig at a cloud company and I used opensuse. Never had any problem at all. The engineers all had ubuntu and had problems with the wifi all the time. Ubuntu does not seem very good. > Alas after IBM and RH ... that whole group of > derivs ... you're kinda reduced to their beta > testers now. SO sad. This is not so good. I hope IBM won't kill redhat in the end. > Switched to Deb - but now IT seems to have hired > a bunch of Canonical rejects ..... Deb has been on my list to try, in case opensuse finally dies. I also thought about trying Alpine linux but I do not know how much trouble musl will cause me. Finally, if those do not deliver, I thought about actually going back to some of my earliest experiments and try FreeBSD for day to day use. Since I'm not a cutting edfe developer, I only need some basics, which I think all are in the FreeBSD packages, so if they fixed their wifi problem (I tried it 1 year ago and had to run a small linux VM for a working wifi driver) it could definitely be a serious option. Oh, and that would mean it doesn't drain the battery as well. But let's see. I think I can stick with opensuse 15.6 for at least another 2-3 years, and then they might kill the project in favuor of some container based crap. > Fedora still seems ok - as far as Fedora is OK. > The Manjaro/Endeavour/Arch end is still OK. Never > a fan of Slack, but, who knows ...... gotta keep > evading suckitude. > > Oh, DID get Tumbleweed to run on a Pi-4 ... and > it all worked. Alas it's a medium/large distro > so things were a bit clunky at times. > > >>> it's literally a minute or two and it'll do a good >>> guess at the opt flags and such needed for what >>> you're setting up. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-06 23:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <27adnXI82bRUU876nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #61767 |
On 12/6/24 4:06 AM, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 12/5/24 4:25 AM, D wrote: >>> >>> >>>> the suggestions, check a few boxes ... saves like >>>> an hour. Ever set up RAID The Hard Way ? With Yast >>> >>> Yast? Are you another opensuse user? I thought I was the only one! >> >> USED to be my fave from LONG back. Found a distro >> in WalMart of all places. Had used Red Hat, but >> SUSE (now OpenSUSE) had many advanced tools that >> made the long and tedious NOT so long and tedious. > > It's been rock solid for me for at least a decade. More probably. I had > a consulting gig at a cloud company and I used opensuse. Never had any > problem at all. The engineers all had ubuntu and had problems with the > wifi all the time. Ubuntu does not seem very good. > >> Alas after IBM and RH ... that whole group of >> derivs ... you're kinda reduced to their beta >> testers now. SO sad. > > This is not so good. I hope IBM won't kill redhat in the end. Alas I think they will. As said, you are now IBMs beta tester. This is valuable for working out a number of kinks - but eventually the kinks will be kinda dealt with. Then RH and its downstream parasites will Go Away. >> Switched to Deb - but now IT seems to have hired >> a bunch of Canonical rejects ..... > > Deb has been on my list to try, in case opensuse finally dies. I also > thought about trying Alpine linux but I do not know how much trouble > musl will cause me. Finally, if those do not deliver, I thought about > actually going back to some of my earliest experiments and try FreeBSD > for day to day use. Since I'm not a cutting edfe developer, I only need > some basics, which I think all are in the FreeBSD packages, so if they > fixed their wifi problem (I tried it 1 year ago and had to run a small > linux VM for a working wifi driver) it could definitely be a serious > option. Oh, and that would mean it doesn't drain the battery as well. > But let's see. I think I can stick with opensuse 15.6 for at least > another 2-3 years, and then they might kill the project in favuor of > some container based crap. Deb WAS the Solid Foundation ... until now. It became just another 'Buntu IMHO. Tragic ! The BSDs are "usable" - really Not Bad. However remember they are Unix, not Linux, so a lot of little stuff is different. They also tend to be a few years behind when it comes to drivers. The real target is SERVERS, not desktops. OpenSUSE/Tumbleweed ... DID get it to run on a Pi-4, albeit a bit clunky sometimes because it isn't a "light" distro. Pi-5s are WEIRD ... can't even get a Fedora for those even a year on. Apparently the boot-up chain of events is a huge kludge. HAVE found instructions - pages and pages and pages of them - WAY too old for that shit and half of it would probably disappear on the next update. If you really want an alt, consider Arch and derivs. Endeavour is nice. Manjaro works well (but, like Tumbleweed, kinda updates the ENTIRE system at the slightest change). >> Fedora still seems ok - as far as Fedora is OK. >> The Manjaro/Endeavour/Arch end is still OK. Never >> a fan of Slack, but, who knows ...... gotta keep >> evading suckitude.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-07 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <fa169574-5ea4-b0e6-af95-8566aeab9129@example.net> |
| In reply to | #61798 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> This is not so good. I hope IBM won't kill redhat in the end. > > > Alas I think they will. As said, you are now IBMs > beta tester. This is valuable for working out a > number of kinks - but eventually the kinks will > be kinda dealt with. Then RH and its downstream > parasites will Go Away. This is very sad. I know a guy who is an EMEA level manager at Redhat, so he benefited from the acquisition with a nice promotion. According to him, what IBM is currently doing to destroy it is to mess around with licensing, to make it more draconian and more expensive. Ceph has moved to IBM, so that will probably go downhill, since IBM will always push GPFS over ceph. At redhat, the only things that is focused on is Openshift, as the ultimate lock-in tool, so the OS just lives to the side in its own world. What is sad is that SUSE is doing the excat same thing. Their strategy seems to be to copy everything Redhat does, and do it worse. They now only focus on rancher, and are leaving the OS to the side. They closed down their openstack and their ceph. What they sadly don't realize is that the OS is their jewel. I would focus on that in the embedded space, they had a hueg lead in the SAP space, and see if I could grow up. But no... rancher and containers it is, and there redhat is blocking them well with openshift. > >>> Switched to Deb - but now IT seems to have hired >>> a bunch of Canonical rejects ..... >> >> Deb has been on my list to try, in case opensuse finally dies. I also >> thought about trying Alpine linux but I do not know how much trouble musl >> will cause me. Finally, if those do not deliver, I thought about actually >> going back to some of my earliest experiments and try FreeBSD for day to >> day use. Since I'm not a cutting edfe developer, I only need some basics, >> which I think all are in the FreeBSD packages, so if they fixed their wifi >> problem (I tried it 1 year ago and had to run a small linux VM for a >> working wifi driver) it could definitely be a serious option. Oh, and that >> would mean it doesn't drain the battery as well. But let's see. I think I >> can stick with opensuse 15.6 for at least another 2-3 years, and then they >> might kill the project in favuor of some container based crap. > > > Deb WAS the Solid Foundation ... until now. It became > just another 'Buntu IMHO. Tragic ! > > The BSDs are "usable" - really Not Bad. However remember > they are Unix, not Linux, so a lot of little stuff is > different. They also tend to be a few years behind when > it comes to drivers. The real target is SERVERS, not > desktops. True. BSDs are a bit behind, but since my main use case is office + light scripting + some light servers stuff (backup, web server, etc.) BSDs should be fine I think. We will see in about 1-2 years when the time comes to leave opensuse 15.6 behind. > OpenSUSE/Tumbleweed ... DID get it to run on a Pi-4, > albeit a bit clunky sometimes because it isn't a > "light" distro. Pi-5s are WEIRD ... can't even get > a Fedora for those even a year on. Apparently the > boot-up chain of events is a huge kludge. HAVE > found instructions - pages and pages and pages > of them - WAY too old for that shit and half of > it would probably disappear on the next update. I have a radxa zero for my kodi/tv use, and I tried to get opensuse to run on it and it was not possible. The radxa zero, being some kind of chinese raspberry copy had horrible documentation, so in the end, the only thing I managed to get working was some kind of dev snapshot of debian in their git repository. I would loooose for raspberry to develop an updated version of the pi zero. That is what the radxa is. I have 4 GB ram and 16 GB built in flash storage on the tiniest board. It was wifi and bluetooth, and kodi and 1080p runs well on it. If raspberry updated their zero to those specs (or beyond) I would drop the radxa in a second since I expect that the git repository will become unmaintained in a year or two. > If you really want an alt, consider Arch and > derivs. Endeavour is nice. Manjaro works well > (but, like Tumbleweed, kinda updates the ENTIRE > system at the slightest change). Thank you for the pointers. Have made a note of this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-08 02:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vg-dnT6oSLW02Mj6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #61818 |
On 12/7/24 5:40 AM, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >>> This is not so good. I hope IBM won't kill redhat in the end. >> >> >> Alas I think they will. As said, you are now IBMs >> beta tester. This is valuable for working out a >> number of kinks - but eventually the kinks will >> be kinda dealt with. Then RH and its downstream >> parasites will Go Away. > > This is very sad. I know a guy who is an EMEA level manager at Redhat, > so he > benefited from the acquisition with a nice promotion. According to him, > what IBM > is currently doing to destroy it is to mess around with licensing, to > make it > more draconian and more expensive. Ceph has moved to IBM, so that will > probably > go downhill, since IBM will always push GPFS over ceph. > > At redhat, the only things that is focused on is Openshift, as the ultimate > lock-in tool, so the OS just lives to the side in its own world. IBM has "different motives" when it comes to Linux. They will use what they want to use and then trash the rest. We're in the middle of that. > What is sad is that SUSE is doing the excat same thing. Their strategy > seems to > be to copy everything Redhat does, and do it worse. They now only focus on > rancher, and are leaving the OS to the side. They closed down their > openstack > and their ceph. Yea, (real)SUSE isn't worth it anymore. Ever tried OpenIndiana - formerly Solaris ? It's not really Linux or Unix but "familiar". Really not so bad. And there's always Plan-9 :-) > What they sadly don't realize is that the OS is their jewel. I would > focus on > that in the embedded space, they had a hueg lead in the SAP space, and > see if I > could grow up. But no... rancher and containers it is, and there redhat is > blocking them well with openshift. The pointy-haired bosses are only interested in quick PROFITS and CONTROL. No sense of 'mission' beyond that. I greatly fear when Linus drops out of the picture. >>>> Switched to Deb - but now IT seems to have hired >>>> a bunch of Canonical rejects ..... >>> >>> Deb has been on my list to try, in case opensuse finally dies. I also >>> thought about trying Alpine linux but I do not know how much trouble >>> musl will cause me. Finally, if those do not deliver, I thought about >>> actually going back to some of my earliest experiments and try >>> FreeBSD for day to day use. Since I'm not a cutting edfe developer, I >>> only need some basics, which I think all are in the FreeBSD packages, >>> so if they fixed their wifi problem (I tried it 1 year ago and had to >>> run a small linux VM for a working wifi driver) it could definitely >>> be a serious option. Oh, and that would mean it doesn't drain the >>> battery as well. But let's see. I think I can stick with opensuse >>> 15.6 for at least another 2-3 years, and then they might kill the >>> project in favuor of some container based crap. >> >> >> Deb WAS the Solid Foundation ... until now. It became >> just another 'Buntu IMHO. Tragic ! >> >> The BSDs are "usable" - really Not Bad. However remember >> they are Unix, not Linux, so a lot of little stuff is >> different. They also tend to be a few years behind when >> it comes to drivers. The real target is SERVERS, not >> desktops. > > True. BSDs are a bit behind, but since my main use case is office + light > scripting + some light servers stuff (backup, web server, etc.) BSDs > should be > fine I think. We will see in about 1-2 years when the time comes to leave > opensuse 15.6 behind. The BSDs might be just perfect for your needs. They are NOT so perfect for other people's needs - esp the gigantic 'desktop' users segment who expect tons of eye candy, GUI everything and anything plugged-in to Just Work. I've got FreeBSD in a VM right now - to refine the 'how to do it' trivia. DID get X and XCFE installed. Next step is to install on an N95 BMax mini-box and attach an external HD box. I'd like to use SAMBA but something weird CHANGED with that in the last year or two and I can't seem to bring up the shares - always permissions errors regardless. NFS works, but it's got less security and far fewer options. Hmmm ... is it possible to 'dd' a VM into a usable bootable image on a real machine ? I've seen various 'answers'. MX has a utility for cloning the running install, it works well, but haven't seen that elsewhere. >> OpenSUSE/Tumbleweed ... DID get it to run on a Pi-4, >> albeit a bit clunky sometimes because it isn't a >> "light" distro. Pi-5s are WEIRD ... can't even get >> a Fedora for those even a year on. Apparently the >> boot-up chain of events is a huge kludge. HAVE >> found instructions - pages and pages and pages >> of them - WAY too old for that shit and half of >> it would probably disappear on the next update. > > I have a radxa zero for my kodi/tv use, and I tried to get opensuse to > run on it > and it was not possible. The radxa zero, being some kind of chinese > raspberry > copy had horrible documentation, so in the end, the only thing I managed > to get > working was some kind of dev snapshot of debian in their git repository. Well, not all PI clones are equal. DID try an Orange PI and Banana PI. Close ... but not QUITE the same. It'd depend on your exact purpose. If you NEED all the I/O pins then stick to PIs, esp genuine PIs. If not then shop BMax/BeeLink mini-boxes. Did buy another Pi just a few weeks ago - but it's a Pi4, not Pi5. The pre- BookWORM distros will run on it. > I would loooose for raspberry to develop an updated version of the pi > zero. That > is what the radxa is. I have 4 GB ram and 16 GB built in flash storage > on the > tiniest board. It was wifi and bluetooth, and kodi and 1080p runs well > on it. The P0 is an interesting variant. You could do a lot of useful stuff with the old Pi-1/2 boards and P0 seems to encapsulate that capability without much more BS. WiFi/BT/etc ... MIGHT take a bigger board - but the parts ARE getting smaller and better all the time. Expect a Pi0.1 eventually. When I retired I still had an original Pi - the one with fewer I/O pins - doing a simple job in the server room (inside an old drill-bit box). It'd been working since forever. DID finally update the system near the end, new SD card - and it still worked great. The new guys don't know Linux from their assholes so I don't know if it's still there ... they just pay M$ lots and lots of $$$ and if anything goes wrong they blame M$ or external vendors. Tragic. > If raspberry updated their zero to those specs (or beyond) I would drop the > radxa in a second since I expect that the git repository will become > unmaintained in a year or two. > >> If you really want an alt, consider Arch and >> derivs. Endeavour is nice. Manjaro works well >> (but, like Tumbleweed, kinda updates the ENTIRE >> system at the slightest change). > > Thank you for the pointers. Have made a note of this. Just trying to predict the near future ... it's not ALL so rosy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-08 13:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <99e16cd0-fc18-0799-79be-460bbe75262c@example.net> |
| In reply to | #61938 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> At redhat, the only things that is focused on is Openshift, as the ultimate >> lock-in tool, so the OS just lives to the side in its own world. > > > IBM has "different motives" when it comes to Linux. > > They will use what they want to use and then trash > the rest. > > We're in the middle of that. This is the truth! They've done it in the past, and I'm sure they'll do it again. I wonder if they will sell of p and z/i eventually as well? Then the transformation to a completely useless consulting organization would be complete. >> What is sad is that SUSE is doing the excat same thing. Their strategy >> seems to >> be to copy everything Redhat does, and do it worse. They now only focus on >> rancher, and are leaving the OS to the side. They closed down their >> openstack >> and their ceph. > > > Yea, (real)SUSE isn't worth it anymore. > > Ever tried OpenIndiana - formerly Solaris ? It's > not really Linux or Unix but "familiar". Really > not so bad. I've heard about it, but I do not think they supported a laptop last time I checked it out, and was VM-only, but perhaps things have moved in the right direction! > And there's always Plan-9 :-) True! =) It would be wonderful if some genius tried to pick it up from where it fell down, and would be able to bring it to life, natively, on a fairly modern laptop! >> What they sadly don't realize is that the OS is their jewel. I would focus >> on >> that in the embedded space, they had a hueg lead in the SAP space, and see >> if I >> could grow up. But no... rancher and containers it is, and there redhat is >> blocking them well with openshift. > > > The pointy-haired bosses are only interested > in quick PROFITS and CONTROL. No sense of 'mission' > beyond that. > > I greatly fear when Linus drops out of the picture. That will be a fascinating day! Only then will we fully understand the results and his unique abilities as benevolent dictator for life. I would not be surprised if the corporate vultures would step in and it ending up with forks, slowly diverging into Dell-linux, IBM-linux, Google-linux etc. all of which, over time will become incompatible with each other by design. >>>>> Switched to Deb - but now IT seems to have hired >>>>> a bunch of Canonical rejects ..... >>>> >>>> Deb has been on my list to try, in case opensuse finally dies. I also >>>> thought about trying Alpine linux but I do not know how much trouble musl >>>> will cause me. Finally, if those do not deliver, I thought about actually >>>> going back to some of my earliest experiments and try FreeBSD for day to >>>> day use. Since I'm not a cutting edfe developer, I only need some basics, >>>> which I think all are in the FreeBSD packages, so if they fixed their >>>> wifi problem (I tried it 1 year ago and had to run a small linux VM for a >>>> working wifi driver) it could definitely be a serious option. Oh, and >>>> that would mean it doesn't drain the battery as well. But let's see. I >>>> think I can stick with opensuse 15.6 for at least another 2-3 years, and >>>> then they might kill the project in favuor of some container based crap. >>> >>> >>> Deb WAS the Solid Foundation ... until now. It became >>> just another 'Buntu IMHO. Tragic ! >>> >>> The BSDs are "usable" - really Not Bad. However remember >>> they are Unix, not Linux, so a lot of little stuff is >>> different. They also tend to be a few years behind when >>> it comes to drivers. The real target is SERVERS, not >>> desktops. >> >> True. BSDs are a bit behind, but since my main use case is office + light >> scripting + some light servers stuff (backup, web server, etc.) BSDs should >> be >> fine I think. We will see in about 1-2 years when the time comes to leave >> opensuse 15.6 behind. > > > The BSDs might be just perfect for your needs. They > are NOT so perfect for other people's needs - esp > the gigantic 'desktop' users segment who expect tons > of eye candy, GUI everything and anything plugged-in > to Just Work. This is the truth! As long as I can have some basic tools, vim, xfce, wifi and decent battery life (oh, and suspend), I'm a happy camper! > I've got FreeBSD in a VM right now - to refine the > 'how to do it' trivia. DID get X and XCFE installed. > Next step is to install on an N95 BMax mini-box and > attach an external HD box. I'd like to use SAMBA but > something weird CHANGED with that in the last year > or two and I can't seem to bring up the shares - > always permissions errors regardless. NFS works, > but it's got less security and far fewer options. It's not the classic version problem? When samba switched from v2 to v3 it decided to break backwards compatibility. I have this problem with an old NAS. When I install a modern opensuse, it cannot access it. I have to specify some flag in order to get it compatible with v2 mode, otherwise it default to v3 mode, and cannot access the old NAS. > Hmmm ... is it possible to 'dd' a VM into a usable > bootable image on a real machine ? I've seen various > 'answers'. MX has a utility for cloning the running > install, it works well, but haven't seen that elsewhere. I don't see anything that speaks against that being possible. >>> OpenSUSE/Tumbleweed ... DID get it to run on a Pi-4, >>> albeit a bit clunky sometimes because it isn't a >>> "light" distro. Pi-5s are WEIRD ... can't even get >>> a Fedora for those even a year on. Apparently the >>> boot-up chain of events is a huge kludge. HAVE >>> found instructions - pages and pages and pages >>> of them - WAY too old for that shit and half of >>> it would probably disappear on the next update. >> >> I have a radxa zero for my kodi/tv use, and I tried to get opensuse to run >> on it >> and it was not possible. The radxa zero, being some kind of chinese >> raspberry >> copy had horrible documentation, so in the end, the only thing I managed to >> get >> working was some kind of dev snapshot of debian in their git repository. > > Well, not all PI clones are equal. DID try an Orange PI > and Banana PI. Close ... but not QUITE the same. It'd > depend on your exact purpose. If you NEED all the I/O > pins then stick to PIs, esp genuine PIs. If not then > shop BMax/BeeLink mini-boxes. Did buy another Pi just > a few weeks ago - but it's a Pi4, not Pi5. The pre- > BookWORM distros will run on it. The only thing I need is power, wifi and a very small formfactor, since it lives behind my flatscreen TV, so it cannot be thicker than about 1 cm or so. >> I would loooose for raspberry to develop an updated version of the pi zero. >> That >> is what the radxa is. I have 4 GB ram and 16 GB built in flash storage on >> the >> tiniest board. It was wifi and bluetooth, and kodi and 1080p runs well on >> it. > > The P0 is an interesting variant. You could do a lot of > useful stuff with the old Pi-1/2 boards and P0 seems to > encapsulate that capability without much more BS. > > WiFi/BT/etc ... MIGHT take a bigger board - but the > parts ARE getting smaller and better all the time. > Expect a Pi0.1 eventually. > > When I retired I still had an original Pi - the one > with fewer I/O pins - doing a simple job in the > server room (inside an old drill-bit box). It'd been > working since forever. DID finally update the system > near the end, new SD card - and it still worked great. > > The new guys don't know Linux from their assholes so > I don't know if it's still there ... they just pay > M$ lots and lots of $$$ and if anything goes wrong > they blame M$ or external vendors. Tragic. This is indeed tragic! It will be fun to see the IT budget explode. It will also be fun to watch them when Microsoft cloud services go down from time to time, and all they can do is to have a coffee and wait. Related to this, I'm currently working on selling software defined storage to companies, and I have discovered that manufacturing companies are _very_ approachable to this argument and owning their own boxes. They know how much it costs to sit around and wait for some cloud provider to get their act together, vs just going down to the data center (or data wardrobe) and restart/change what's not working. I'm surprised, but it is nice to have found out that this awareness is still aliev and well in the manufacturing space! =) >> If raspberry updated their zero to those specs (or beyond) I would drop the >> radxa in a second since I expect that the git repository will become >> unmaintained in a year or two. >> >>> If you really want an alt, consider Arch and >>> derivs. Endeavour is nice. Manjaro works well >>> (but, like Tumbleweed, kinda updates the ENTIRE >>> system at the slightest change). >> >> Thank you for the pointers. Have made a note of this. > > Just trying to predict the near future ... it's > not ALL so rosy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-08 19:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <AMm5P.1842$rHBb.878@fx46.iad> |
| In reply to | #61963 |
On 2024-12-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> The new guys don't know Linux from their assholes so >> I don't know if it's still there ... they just pay >> M$ lots and lots of $$$ and if anything goes wrong >> they blame M$ or external vendors. Tragic. s/blame/shovel more money at/ Your typical luser now just shrugs his shoulders and re-boots, re-formats, and re-installs, while meekly accepting that this is The Way Things Are. > This is indeed tragic! It will be fun to see the IT budget explode. > It will also be fun to watch them when Microsoft cloud services go > down from time to time, and all they can do is to have a coffee and wait. Given that M$'s quality critera can be summed up as "sort of works, most of the time", we'll be seeing plenty of this - although there will probably be a higher-priced option that goes down slightly less often. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-09 01:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1AqdnVrHJMM8Ecv6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #61974 |
On 12/8/24 2:50 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-12-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> The new guys don't know Linux from their assholes so >>> I don't know if it's still there ... they just pay >>> M$ lots and lots of $$$ and if anything goes wrong >>> they blame M$ or external vendors. Tragic. > > s/blame/shovel more money at/ > > Your typical luser now just shrugs his shoulders and re-boots, > re-formats, and re-installs, while meekly accepting that this is > The Way Things Are. It's not just "users" anymore ... they aren't expected to know much. It's also a very large segment of IT. The goal is to Blame Someone Else - not deal, not fix, not defend, not innovate. >> This is indeed tragic! It will be fun to see the IT budget explode. >> It will also be fun to watch them when Microsoft cloud services go >> down from time to time, and all they can do is to have a coffee and wait. > > Given that M$'s quality critera can be summed up as > "sort of works, most of the time ", we'll be seeing > plenty of this - although there will probably be a > higher-priced option that goes down slightly less often. Yep ... create problem, then CHARGE everyone huge $$$ FOR the problems ........ Almost an infallible biz model eh ? :-) Who said Bill wasn't smart ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-09 15:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vj72aj$f66m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #61998 |
186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > On 12/8/24 2:50 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2024-12-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> The new guys don't know Linux from their assholes so >>>> I don't know if it's still there ... they just pay >>>> M$ lots and lots of $$$ and if anything goes wrong >>>> they blame M$ or external vendors. Tragic. >> >> s/blame/shovel more money at/ >> >> Your typical luser now just shrugs his shoulders and re-boots, >> re-formats, and re-installs, while meekly accepting that this is >> The Way Things Are. > > > It's not just "users" anymore ... they aren't expected > to know much. It's also a very large segment of IT. The > goal is to Blame Someone Else - not deal, not fix, not > defend, not innovate. Indeed, *very* much so. Which is why "enterprise" and "corporate" IT environments are so rabid about having "support". "Support" is their buzzword for "someone else to blame so we can cover our assess when the shit hits the fan".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-09 15:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vj743v$f8rj$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62029 |
On 09/12/2024 15:28, Rich wrote: > ndeed,*very* much so. Which is why "enterprise" and "corporate" IT > environments are so rabid about having "support". "Support" is their > buzzword for "someone else to blame so we can cover our assess when the > shit hits the fan". LOL. Most support contracts are not worth wiping your bottom on. They are just designed to make money out of. The sub prime mortgage crisis was typical of such. "We have shit loads of bad debt that we cant offload" "Well package it up with insurance against failure and sell it as A1 guaranteed debt then" "But what will happen if the insurance companies can't cover it" "Oh that will be the government's problem, not ours" http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/story.jpg -- “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.” ― Groucho Marx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-09 21:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vj7ost$jcv2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62031 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 09/12/2024 15:28, Rich wrote: >> ndeed,*very* much so. Which is why "enterprise" and "corporate" IT >> environments are so rabid about having "support". "Support" is their >> buzzword for "someone else to blame so we can cover our assess when the >> shit hits the fan". > > LOL. > > Most support contracts are not worth wiping your bottom on. > > They are just designed to make money out of. > > The sub prime mortgage crisis was typical of such. > > "We have shit loads of bad debt that we cant offload" > "Well package it up with insurance against failure and sell it as A1 > guaranteed debt then" > "But what will happen if the insurance companies can't cover it" > "Oh that will be the government's problem, not ours" > > > http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/story.jpg Nice... Although I doubt that anyone actually asked the "what if" question about the insurance companies in the run-up to the explosion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-10 15:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vj9mp5$10sqc$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62063 |
On 09/12/2024 21:53, Rich wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 09/12/2024 15:28, Rich wrote: >>> ndeed,*very* much so. Which is why "enterprise" and "corporate" IT >>> environments are so rabid about having "support". "Support" is their >>> buzzword for "someone else to blame so we can cover our assess when the >>> shit hits the fan". >> >> LOL. >> >> Most support contracts are not worth wiping your bottom on. >> >> They are just designed to make money out of. >> >> The sub prime mortgage crisis was typical of such. >> >> "We have shit loads of bad debt that we cant offload" >> "Well package it up with insurance against failure and sell it as A1 >> guaranteed debt then" >> "But what will happen if the insurance companies can't cover it" >> "Oh that will be the government's problem, not ours" >> >> >> http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/story.jpg > > Nice... > > Although I doubt that anyone actually asked the "what if" question > about the insurance companies in the run-up to the explosion. Oh they did. My then BiL was deep into finance and banking at the time and was literally shaking his head in disbelief. The financial times had grave doubts. Cambridge city council bunged 8 million into Icelandic banks which was stupid. I asked whether the bursar had ever read the FT. The reply came back 'no, he is too busy' My jaw has never actually returned to the correct place. A man in charge of investing millions of pounds of public money is 'too busy' to read the most important financial paper in the world? Apparently the job consist in random picking of half a dozen investments from an apprioved list. On that list were several banks that needed rescuing ultimately.. How someone with no apparent experience in finance or accounting got that job I cannot say. It was the same with GM bonds. GM bonds were - or should have been - junk. GM was essentially bankrupt. And yet they were trading on the basis that the political fallout from letting GM crash and burn was such that the government would always bail them out -- “Some people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of a car with the cramped public exposure of an airplane.” Dennis Miller
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-10 20:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <6682433b-c12c-2d80-665a-c4d32d9b0dbf@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62117 |
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 09/12/2024 21:53, Rich wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 09/12/2024 15:28, Rich wrote: >>>> ndeed,*very* much so. Which is why "enterprise" and "corporate" IT >>>> environments are so rabid about having "support". "Support" is their >>>> buzzword for "someone else to blame so we can cover our assess when the >>>> shit hits the fan". >>> >>> LOL. >>> >>> Most support contracts are not worth wiping your bottom on. >>> >>> They are just designed to make money out of. >>> >>> The sub prime mortgage crisis was typical of such. >>> >>> "We have shit loads of bad debt that we cant offload" >>> "Well package it up with insurance against failure and sell it as A1 >>> guaranteed debt then" >>> "But what will happen if the insurance companies can't cover it" >>> "Oh that will be the government's problem, not ours" >>> >>> >>> http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/story.jpg >> >> Nice... >> >> Although I doubt that anyone actually asked the "what if" question >> about the insurance companies in the run-up to the explosion. > > Oh they did. My then BiL was deep into finance and banking at the time and > was literally shaking his head in disbelief. The financial times had grave > doubts. > > Cambridge city council bunged 8 million into Icelandic banks which was > stupid. I asked whether the bursar had ever read the FT. The reply came back > 'no, he is too busy' > > My jaw has never actually returned to the correct place. A man in charge of > investing millions of pounds of public money is 'too busy' to read the most > important financial paper in the world? > > Apparently the job consist in random picking of half a dozen investments from > an apprioved list. On that list were several banks that needed rescuing > ultimately.. > > How someone with no apparent experience in finance or accounting got that job > I cannot say. > > It was the same with GM bonds. GM bonds were - or should have been - junk. GM > was essentially bankrupt. > > And yet they were trading on the basis that the political fallout from > letting GM crash and burn was such that the government would always bail them > out That is why I am in favour of having as a _requirement_ for senior public positions and political offices to 1. Have a degree. 2. Know english. Ideally it would be nice to have them pass a psychological test to make sure they are not complete psychos, and perhaps an intelligence test or two as well. =) I doubt I will see the above happen in my lifetime, although, if transhumanism is right, perhaps immortality is around the corner! I also think that having an academic degree actually is a requirement in some countries. In germany senior politicians seem to be very fond of plagiarizing their way to Ph.D:s.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-09 22:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lrp8v2FnkpkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62031 |
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:58:55 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > "We have shit loads of bad debt that we cant offload" > "Well package it up with insurance against failure and sell it as A1 > guaranteed debt then" > "But what will happen if the insurance companies can't cover it" > "Oh that will be the government's problem, not ours" I remember an article in the WSJ about the great new idea of creating a tranche of mortgages likely to fail, peddle the derivatives, and wait for the failure and subsequent insurance payout. I'm not interested in the stock market or economics in general but I thought 'this isn't going to end well.' I thought the same about the 1999 'Financial Services Modernization Act' that removed the Glass-Steagal controls with the financiers promising they weren't going to do anything stupid this time. I'm not prescient nor do I claim any expertise in economics, foreign policy, and so forth but it's depressing how often my personal analysis proves to be correct versus the 'experts'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-10 10:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <64c872ec-daf7-68a8-1893-f29b6e14a654@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62069 |
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:58:55 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> "We have shit loads of bad debt that we cant offload" >> "Well package it up with insurance against failure and sell it as A1 >> guaranteed debt then" >> "But what will happen if the insurance companies can't cover it" >> "Oh that will be the government's problem, not ours" > > I remember an article in the WSJ about the great new idea of creating a > tranche of mortgages likely to fail, peddle the derivatives, and wait for > the failure and subsequent insurance payout. > > I'm not interested in the stock market or economics in general but I > thought 'this isn't going to end well.' I thought the same about the 1999 > 'Financial Services Modernization Act' that removed the Glass-Steagal > controls with the financiers promising they weren't going to do anything > stupid this time. > > I'm not prescient nor do I claim any expertise in economics, foreign > policy, and so forth but it's depressing how often my personal analysis > proves to be correct versus the 'experts'. > I think one reason for this is that you, and I, can often analyze in the comfort of our own homes and we are not public persons. The glamour experts are often public persons and they thrive in the spot light. That means that they must adapt their analyzes to what sells at the moment. Then you have the other strategy adopted by Dr Doom who confidently predicts a disaster every year, until he finally is right, and then he is dusted off and paraded through the media, only to then be forgotten for about 6-7 years until he is right again. ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-10 15:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vj9nc1$10sqc$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62069 |
On 09/12/2024 22:23, rbowman wrote: > 'm not interested in the stock market or economics in general but I > thought 'this isn't going to end well.' I thought the same about the 1999 > 'Financial Services Modernization Act' that removed the Glass-Steagal > controls with the financiers promising they weren't going to do anything > stupid this time. > Indeed. I was peripherally interested. For reasons I wont go into here. All the signs were of a major crash, but in the end only Lehman went to the wall and here Arthur Andersen, crooks of the first order. The world has been bumbling along on fantasy finance ever since. Taking on debt that will never be repaid We need a world war to wipe some slates clean frankly > I'm not prescient nor do I claim any expertise in economics, foreign > policy, and so forth but it's depressing how often my personal analysis > proves to be correct versus the 'experts'. Wood and trees mate. You are nicely distant and can take objective views. -- For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. H.L.Mencken
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-09 22:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lrp8gpFnkplU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62029 |
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:28:19 -0000 (UTC), Rich wrote: > Indeed, *very* much so. Which is why "enterprise" and "corporate" IT > environments are so rabid about having "support". "Support" is their > buzzword for "someone else to blame so we can cover our assess when the > shit hits the fan". An argument from our clients is Linux isn't 'supported'. When asked if they've ever used Microsoft support, crickets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 43 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 43 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web