Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #24481
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Are Computer able to think? |
| Date | 2013-07-14 14:21 -0700 |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
| Message-ID | <7xppuk25y4.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <krr965$hhr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <f739d884-b5ab-4526-8385-ebdf675fd582@googlegroups.com> <krso15$8nu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <97d7d1ca-626c-4770-b242-da0ec3ddab50@googlegroups.com> <krv0i6$i3r$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> writes:
>> Arduino as the microprocessor grail, but totally without Forth?
> Forth may fit on such processors, but I personally believe C is the
> best choice.
Forth seems well suited for the Arduino in that:
1) you can run a complete Forth environment directly in the Arduino,
while C has to be cross compiled;
2) Forth has an interactive development model where you can change
the code without disturbing the program data. C environments
usually involve re-initializing the device every time you load
new code. Interaction makes some forms of testing and debugging
much easier.
Interaction is also seen as an advantage of Lisp, Python, Smalltalk, etc.
> I still don't see what the push is with C++ either. It's simply
> not as effective as C in the correct hands. ISTM, that the real
> reason for C++ is simply because an individual incompetent in
> programming C simply decided he didn't like it and wanted something
> else, i.e., Stroustrup.
Meh, I've met Stroustrup and he is a pretty sharp cookie and it's a bit
over the top to claim that he was incompetent at writing C. Hint: what
do you think his early C++ implementations were written in?. C++ has
many drawbacks but it also has significant advantages. It's reasonable
to question whether the advantages outweigh the drawbacks, but that's
much different than saying the advantages aren't there.
> Other languages came about much the same way, e.g., Ruby.
That makes no sense either. Ruby is inefficient, but it is far more
compact and expressive than C.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-12 06:18 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-12 07:42 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-07-12 12:33 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-07-12 12:46 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-07-12 14:28 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-07-12 14:50 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-18 11:36 +0000
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-18 07:31 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-18 23:41 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-13 02:52 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-12 20:06 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-13 14:34 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-13 19:54 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-14 11:32 +0000
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-14 11:46 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 21:57 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-12 20:44 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-13 14:37 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-12 20:08 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-13 01:44 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-13 22:25 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-13 06:15 -0400
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-13 11:31 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-13 19:31 -0400
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-13 18:17 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-14 16:11 -0400
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-14 14:21 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-14 15:03 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 21:51 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-15 00:09 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-15 02:39 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-17 04:21 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-17 07:31 -1000
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-17 12:06 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-17 23:53 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-18 22:23 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-19 00:48 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-14 18:22 -0400
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-14 15:44 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-15 21:00 -0400
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-16 03:43 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-16 23:24 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-16 07:24 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-16 23:41 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-16 19:16 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? AKK <akk@nospam.org> - 2013-07-17 08:04 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-16 23:27 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-16 20:48 -1000
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-17 11:51 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-17 04:49 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 07:15 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-18 11:59 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 21:56 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-18 23:45 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-18 15:16 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-18 17:40 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-19 01:08 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-19 02:48 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-19 01:18 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-19 03:35 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-22 09:50 +0000
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-18 17:32 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-19 19:28 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-19 10:51 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-20 00:34 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-19 23:08 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-20 05:49 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-07-20 06:21 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-07-20 14:02 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-20 17:02 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-07-21 10:02 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-07-21 10:07 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hannu Vuolasaho <hannu.vuolasaho@nospam.tut.fi.invalid> - 2013-07-21 19:23 +0000
Re: Are Computer able to think? Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-07-20 10:07 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-19 18:16 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-18 15:09 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-17 10:46 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 00:40 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-17 21:34 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-17 23:55 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-18 13:03 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 22:00 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 07:21 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-18 11:02 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 22:02 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-18 21:43 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-17 03:29 -0500
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 21:44 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-15 16:45 +0200
Re: Are Computer able to think? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-15 20:32 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? mentifex@myuw.net - 2013-07-14 11:52 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-17 05:24 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-18 11:15 +0000
Re: Are Computer able to think? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-07-18 11:33 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? jim@rainbarrel.com - 2013-07-24 20:09 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-25 00:15 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-07-25 08:38 -0700
csiph-web