Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > aus.computers > #49572

Re: Windows OS

From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups aus.cars, aus.computers
Subject Re: Windows OS
Date 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100
Message-ID <de9quhFhfi2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <567f4a13$0$1515$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <de98goFddmjU1@mid.individual.net> <567f8e73$0$11102$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <de9lu4Fg9qrU1@mid.individual.net> <567faa29$0$21718$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw



"D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message 
news:567faa29$0$21718$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> On 27/12/2015 7:30 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>
>> "D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message
>> news:567f8e73$0$11102$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>> On 27/12/2015 3:41 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:567f4a13$0$1515$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com...
>>>>> On 27/12/2015 9:29 AM, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 22/12/2015 1:17 PM, D Walford wrote:
>>>>>>> On 22/12/2015 4:02 PM, XR8 Sprintless wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2015 2:56 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 22-December-2015 3:20 PM, XR8 Sprintless wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So far I am yet to be convinced that Windows 10 is any better 
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's more complicated (difficult to use) and designed to encourage
>>>>>>>>> ppl
>>>>>>>>> to buy from the 'store'. I don't know why M$ never seem to
>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>> that simpler is better.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have the benefit of industry specific training packages,
>>>>>>>> however in
>>>>>>>> saying that I still find that the interface is clunky and
>>>>>>>> sometimes it
>>>>>>>> does not take you where you actually want to go.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example settings on the start menu gives you limited access to
>>>>>>>> certain settings, however to do anything you have to still go into
>>>>>>>> control panel which can be accessed at least by right clicking on
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> start menu icon as well as computer management which is one I use
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>> the time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After my recent crash recovery I reinstalled Win7 because I had the
>>>>>>> disc, now I keep getting messages to "upgrade" to 10.
>>>>>>> Good idea or not?
>>>>>>> I didn't mind 10 before the crash and I don't think it was the 
>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>> the computer crashed because it was locking it before I installed 
>>>>>>> 10.
>>>>>>> For some reason the computer is a lot more stable now so I'm
>>>>>>> thinking I
>>>>>>> should leave it alone despite it telling me that there is a hard
>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Rod suggested you should post you SMART data as it will tell you
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> condition of your drive and why you are receiving the error. The 
>>>>>> drive
>>>>>> might have developed bad sectors and if it runs out of reserve 
>>>>>> sectors
>>>>>> you will likely lose data so back-up anything important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are any number of SMART drive monitors that are free to 
>>>>>> download
>>>>>> and use but you can try this first:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Click Start and in the search box type CMD and press Enter (open the
>>>>>> Command Prompt)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Type
>>>>>> wmic
>>>>>> and press Enter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then type
>>>>>> diskdrive get status
>>>>>> and press Enter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The returned status should say
>>>>>> Status
>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you getting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Its says OK.
>>>>> A Google search suggests that the problem might be the cable or where
>>>>> its plugged into the mother board,
>>>>
>>>> That’s quite unlikely than the SMART report will tell me
>>>> if that is the problem even if you don’t understand it.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I've checked the connection and it looks OK.
>>>>> When I get time I will see if I have another cable.
>>>>
>>>> Makes more sense to get the SMART report first.
>>>
>>> 'ID' 'Description' 'Raw' 'Normalized' 'Threshold' 'Action'
>>> 5 Re-allocated Sector Count 3 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> 9 Power-On Hours Count 12257 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> 0C Power Cycle Count 1869 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> C0 Unsafe Shutdown Count 170 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> E1 Host Writes 5.62 TB 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> E8 Available Reserved Space 0 100 10 Ready for use.
>>> E9 Media Wearout Indicator 0 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> F1 Total LBAs Written 5.62 TB 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> F2 Total LBAs Read 4.72 TB 100 0 Ready for use.
>>> F9 Total NAND Writes 6712 100 0 Ready for use.
>> etc
>>
>> That's not the Everest SMART report.
>> http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/everest_free_edition.html
>>
>>
>
> OK, downloaded the program, opened "storage" then SMART then quick report?
> Is that what you need?

No, that isn't the SMART report.

It has roughly the same format as the bit of the other one I left in the 
quoting.
 

Back to aus.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 15:56 +1100
  Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 15:02 +1000
    Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-22 16:17 +1100
      Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 17:49 +1100
        Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:21 +1100
          Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 05:28 +1100
      Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 06:29 +0800
        Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:16 +1100
          Re: Windows OS Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2015-12-27 13:37 +1100
            Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +1100
              Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:43 +1100
          Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:41 +1100
            Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 18:08 +1100
              Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 19:30 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 20:06 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 21:27 +1100
                Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:59 +1000
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 22:15 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:31 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 07:08 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 08:47 +1100
                Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 08:39 +1000
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 15:54 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 16:46 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 18:29 +1100
                Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-29 22:00 +1000
                Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 22:09 +1000
                Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-30 21:21 +1000
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:20 +1100
          Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 17:13 +0800
    Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 12:34 +1100
      Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-23 12:09 +1000
        Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 14:51 +1100
      Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-23 15:03 +1100
      Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 18:22 +1100
  Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
  Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 19:25 +1100
  Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:33 +1100
  Re: Windows OS hislop <takecarebeware@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 22:25 +1100
  Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 14:32 +1100
    Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:00 +1100
      Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 16:15 +1100
        Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:35 +1100
        Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:35 +1100
          Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:47 +1000
          Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-26 20:01 +1100
            Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-26 22:12 +1100
              Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:02 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:22 +1100
            Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:34 +1100
              Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:03 +1100
      Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:20 +1100
        Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 05:21 +1100
    Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 18:21 +1100

csiph-web