Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #49572
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.cars, aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Windows OS |
| Date | 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <de9quhFhfi2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <567f4a13$0$1515$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <de98goFddmjU1@mid.individual.net> <567f8e73$0$11102$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <de9lu4Fg9qrU1@mid.individual.net> <567faa29$0$21718$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message news:567faa29$0$21718$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... > On 27/12/2015 7:30 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message >> news:567f8e73$0$11102$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... >>> On 27/12/2015 3:41 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message >>>> news:567f4a13$0$1515$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com... >>>>> On 27/12/2015 9:29 AM, Clocky wrote: >>>>>> On 22/12/2015 1:17 PM, D Walford wrote: >>>>>>> On 22/12/2015 4:02 PM, XR8 Sprintless wrote: >>>>>>>> On 22/12/2015 2:56 PM, felix_unger wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 22-December-2015 3:20 PM, XR8 Sprintless wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So far I am yet to be convinced that Windows 10 is any better >>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>> Windows 7. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's more complicated (difficult to use) and designed to encourage >>>>>>>>> ppl >>>>>>>>> to buy from the 'store'. I don't know why M$ never seem to >>>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>>> that simpler is better. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have the benefit of industry specific training packages, >>>>>>>> however in >>>>>>>> saying that I still find that the interface is clunky and >>>>>>>> sometimes it >>>>>>>> does not take you where you actually want to go. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For example settings on the start menu gives you limited access to >>>>>>>> certain settings, however to do anything you have to still go into >>>>>>>> control panel which can be accessed at least by right clicking on >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> start menu icon as well as computer management which is one I use >>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>> the time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> After my recent crash recovery I reinstalled Win7 because I had the >>>>>>> disc, now I keep getting messages to "upgrade" to 10. >>>>>>> Good idea or not? >>>>>>> I didn't mind 10 before the crash and I don't think it was the >>>>>>> reason >>>>>>> the computer crashed because it was locking it before I installed >>>>>>> 10. >>>>>>> For some reason the computer is a lot more stable now so I'm >>>>>>> thinking I >>>>>>> should leave it alone despite it telling me that there is a hard >>>>>>> drive >>>>>>> error. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As Rod suggested you should post you SMART data as it will tell you >>>>>> the >>>>>> condition of your drive and why you are receiving the error. The >>>>>> drive >>>>>> might have developed bad sectors and if it runs out of reserve >>>>>> sectors >>>>>> you will likely lose data so back-up anything important. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are any number of SMART drive monitors that are free to >>>>>> download >>>>>> and use but you can try this first: >>>>>> >>>>>> Click Start and in the search box type CMD and press Enter (open the >>>>>> Command Prompt) >>>>>> >>>>>> Type >>>>>> wmic >>>>>> and press Enter. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then type >>>>>> diskdrive get status >>>>>> and press Enter >>>>>> >>>>>> The returned status should say >>>>>> Status >>>>>> OK >>>>>> >>>>>> What are you getting? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Its says OK. >>>>> A Google search suggests that the problem might be the cable or where >>>>> its plugged into the mother board, >>>> >>>> That’s quite unlikely than the SMART report will tell me >>>> if that is the problem even if you don’t understand it. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> I've checked the connection and it looks OK. >>>>> When I get time I will see if I have another cable. >>>> >>>> Makes more sense to get the SMART report first. >>> >>> 'ID' 'Description' 'Raw' 'Normalized' 'Threshold' 'Action' >>> 5 Re-allocated Sector Count 3 100 0 Ready for use. >>> 9 Power-On Hours Count 12257 100 0 Ready for use. >>> 0C Power Cycle Count 1869 100 0 Ready for use. >>> C0 Unsafe Shutdown Count 170 100 0 Ready for use. >>> E1 Host Writes 5.62 TB 100 0 Ready for use. >>> E8 Available Reserved Space 0 100 10 Ready for use. >>> E9 Media Wearout Indicator 0 100 0 Ready for use. >>> F1 Total LBAs Written 5.62 TB 100 0 Ready for use. >>> F2 Total LBAs Read 4.72 TB 100 0 Ready for use. >>> F9 Total NAND Writes 6712 100 0 Ready for use. >> etc >> >> That's not the Everest SMART report. >> http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/everest_free_edition.html >> >> > > OK, downloaded the program, opened "storage" then SMART then quick report? > Is that what you need? No, that isn't the SMART report. It has roughly the same format as the bit of the other one I left in the quoting.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 15:56 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 15:02 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-22 16:17 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 17:49 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:21 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 05:28 +1100
Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 06:29 +0800
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:16 +1100
Re: Windows OS Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2015-12-27 13:37 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:43 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:41 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 18:08 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 19:30 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 20:06 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 21:27 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:59 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 22:15 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:31 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 07:08 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 08:47 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 08:39 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 15:54 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 16:46 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 18:29 +1100
Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-29 22:00 +1000
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 22:09 +1000
Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-30 21:21 +1000
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 17:13 +0800
Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 12:34 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-23 12:09 +1000
Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 14:51 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-23 15:03 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 18:22 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 19:25 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:33 +1100
Re: Windows OS hislop <takecarebeware@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 22:25 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 14:32 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:00 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 16:15 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:35 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:35 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:47 +1000
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-26 20:01 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-26 22:12 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:02 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:22 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:34 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:03 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 05:21 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 18:21 +1100
csiph-web