Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #49504
| From | felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.cars, aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Windows OS |
| Date | 2015-12-24 14:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <de17beFeo5vU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <56791d69$0$1534$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <rt2j7b5gu12n6c2mcs5ncq7rsn0ubq5ko6@4ax.com> <5679d5ad$0$1500$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <n5cq6i$iro$1@dont-email.me> <n5fkb8$s0j$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 24-December-2015 1:15 PM, Xeno wrote: > On 23/12/2015 11:37 AM, Noddy wrote: >> On 23/12/15 9:58 AM, D Walford wrote: >> >>> My son has gone over to the dark side, where he works in the UK >>> everything is Mac and he has become a fan, after my latest computer >>> problem he's telling me to dump the PC and buy a Mac. >> >> Which is a perfectly sensible thing to do, *if* you like paying through >> the nose for your hardware, > > Good quality hardware costs, just like hardware in the PC world. I would never buy a Mac. I like to 'fiddle' (I make/repair/upgrade my own PC's) and Apple actively discourage fiddling. they want users to pay a fortune to one of their accredited dealers to do what one could easily do themselves if it were a PC. but my very first personal computer was an Apple Mac, with 128k of RAM (no, that's not a misprint!) and no hard drive. but it was technologically streets ahead of IBM machines of the day, which were still using DOS. Win 3.1 hadn't been released of course, but when it was it was just a crude copy of the Mac OS, which was called 'finder' as I recall. However, as windows evolved I decided to make the change. the cost of Mac hardware and software, the low cost of PC software/hardware by comparison, and not to mention the plethora available, and of course the ease of upgrading PC's were the crucial factors. > >> want around 5% of the world's software made available to you > > Of course 95% of PC software is just duplicate functionality software > that matches the functionality of the 5% of the Mac software. > >> and want to put up with Apple's bullshit. > > What bullshit would that be Noddy? how about the fact that you just have to guess most of time how to do things? iPads don't even come with an instruction book for example. Apple tries to create the impression that it's a superior product for superior more intelligent users. snobby ppl who drive European cars and sip lattes always buy Apple products. :) > > The Mac OS? Been a free upgrade for years. Even before the Mac OS was > free, it was very cheap, unlike Windows ripoff upgrades. It's > interesting to note that the Mac OS/X operating system has had the > same user interface since 2001, unlike Windows on PCs in the same > timeframe. that IS a good feature > Apple realised that Phones/Tablets have different operational and user > interface requirements to Desktop/laptop computers hence we have 2 > Apple operating systems. OS/X for desktops/laptops and iOS for > phones/tablets. no one in their right mind would buy a windows phone anyway.. > This is not surprising from a company like Apple who seemed to > understand the difference and were very successful in the tablet and > phone market. So successful was Apple that iPhone and Mac sales > continue to grow, even with a rise in the number of competitors into > the marketplace. > > The app store? Get used to it, it's a proven success. So much so that, > belatedly, Micro$oft is attempting to emulate the success. I wish them > luck as their success rate at predicting trends and capitalising on > them have seen a singular lack of success in many areas. Attempts at > making Windows on desktops operate like a tablet have been a > resounding failure and Win 10, with it's regression to the Start Menu, > is proof of that. Micro$oft should have consulted Apple! ;-) OS > market share can be misleading; http://tinyurl.com/qxs7vfu Looks > like Apple aren't in the race but when you consider that Apple > primarily sells hardware with a packaged OS, the chart shows they are > selling a shitload of hardware. Microsoft, on the other hand, sell > only software though they have tried to market hardware/software > packages in the past with less than stellar success. that's all true isn't it > >> >> Fuck that. Owning an *Ipod* was enough to convince me that Apple would >> never get another cent out of me. I had the same conclusion after buying an iPad. however, non apple tablets weren't in the race when I bought it. different story now though > > So, you bought an iPod and, on that basis, you're now an expert on Mac > hardware and software. Story of your life really! Sorry but you can't > judge other Apple products based on your experience with an iPod. The > most notable difference is that the iPod had a very minimalistic user > interface, much like most MP3 players around at the time. You probably > haven't realised it but most other Apple products go to the opposite > end of the spectrum. In fact, smart phones seem to be killing of the > iPod and other MP3 player variants these days. After all, it seems all > smart phones have MP3 and video player functionality these days. The > iPod is occupying an ever diminishing niche these days. > > -- rgds, Pete ------- Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White, Diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive society, are all code words for White Genocide! http://thereligionofpeace.com http://pamelageller.com/ http://ausnet.info/islam/lakemba.html the picture that shocked the world!.. http://ausnet.info/islam/hypocrisy.jpg "No need for concern. Only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940 only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How did that turn out?" "ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith" -Barack Obama, idiotic President and Grand Imam of the USA
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 15:56 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 15:02 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-22 16:17 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 17:49 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:21 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 05:28 +1100
Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 06:29 +0800
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:16 +1100
Re: Windows OS Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2015-12-27 13:37 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:43 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:41 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 18:08 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 19:30 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 20:06 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 21:27 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:59 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 22:15 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:31 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 07:08 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 08:47 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 08:39 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 15:54 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 16:46 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 18:29 +1100
Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-29 22:00 +1000
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 22:09 +1000
Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-30 21:21 +1000
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 17:13 +0800
Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 12:34 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-23 12:09 +1000
Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 14:51 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-23 15:03 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 18:22 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 19:25 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:33 +1100
Re: Windows OS hislop <takecarebeware@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 22:25 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 14:32 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:00 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 16:15 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:35 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:35 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:47 +1000
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-26 20:01 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-26 22:12 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:02 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:22 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:34 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:03 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 05:21 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 18:21 +1100
csiph-web