Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > aus.computers > #49555

Re: Windows OS

From felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>
Newsgroups aus.computers
Subject Re: Windows OS
Date 2015-12-27 12:03 +1100
Message-ID <de8rndFanesU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <de1celFfq7dU1@mid.individual.net> <de1dcbFg04qU1@mid.individual.net> <n5ghkm$284$1@dont-email.me> <de73b5Fre7eU2@mid.individual.net> <de84umF5a1jU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 27-December-2015 5:34 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>
> "felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message 
> news:de73b5Fre7eU2@mid.individual.net...
>> On 24-December-2015 9:35 PM, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 24/12/2015 4:15 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>> On 24-December-2015 4:00 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
>>>>>> Xeno wrote
>>>>>>> Noddy wrote
>>>>>>>> D Walford wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My son has gone over to the dark side, where he works in the UK
>>>>>>>>> everything is Mac and he has become a fan, after my latest 
>>>>>>>>> computer
>>>>>>>>> problem he's telling me to dump the PC and buy a Mac.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which is a perfectly sensible thing to do, *if* you like paying
>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>> the nose for your hardware,
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good quality hardware costs, just like hardware in the PC world.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would never buy a Mac.
>>>>>
>>>>> I might, but only to develop iOS apps.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I like to 'fiddle' (I make/repair/upgrade my own PC's) and Apple
>>>>>> actively discourage fiddling. they want users to pay a fortune to 
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> of their accredited dealers to do what one could easily do 
>>>>>> themselves
>>>>>> if it were a PC. but my very first personal computer was an Apple
>>>>>> Mac, with 128k of RAM (no, that's not a misprint!) and no hard 
>>>>>> drive.
>>>>>> but it was technologically streets ahead of IBM machines of the day,
>>>>>> which were still using DOS. Win 3.1 hadn't been released of course,
>>>>>> but when it was it was just a crude copy of the Mac OS, which was
>>>>>> called 'finder' as I recall. However, as windows evolved I 
>>>>>> decided to
>>>>>> make the change. the cost of Mac hardware and software, the low cost
>>>>>> of PC software/hardware by comparison, and not to mention the
>>>>>> plethora available, and of course the ease of upgrading PC's were 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> crucial factors.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> want around 5% of the world's software made available to you
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course 95% of PC software is just duplicate functionality
>>>>>>> software that matches the functionality of the 5% of the Mac 
>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and want to put up with Apple's bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What bullshit would that be Noddy?
>>>>>
>>>>>> how about the fact that you just have to guess most of time how 
>>>>>> to do
>>>>>> things? iPads don't even come with an instruction book for example.
>>>>>
>>>>> They do have a proper electronic manual. It would
>>>>> be completely stupid to have a printed one.
>>>>
>>>> what about someone who's never used one before. how are they 
>>>> supposed to
>>>> know how to get the electronic manual? apple should include a 'quick
>>>> start' guide, like most products have these days, and instructions on
>>>
>>> They do, it's an inbuilt tutorial.
>>
>> afaik I don't have it on my ipad.
>
> You do, its only there initially after you start it for the first time.
> It will return if you do a full factory restore.

ok

>
>>>> how to do basic stuff, and that there is an electronic manual 
>>>> available
>>>> and how to get it. their failure to do this is just another 
>>>> indicator of
>>>> their arrogance.
>>>>
>>> The built in tutorial takes you through all the necessary processes. 
>>> That would include using 'gestures', more than enough to get you 
>>> going I would suspect.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple tries to create the impression that it's a superior product 
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> superior more intelligent users.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a lot more intuitive than the android system.
>>>>>
>>>>> And quite a bit more restricted too in some areas.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't for example have the phones auto answer
>>>>> incoming calls because that can be used to snoop
>>>>> on people who set their phone up that way.
>>>>
>>>> we're talking about computers
>>>
>>> Micro$oft would like you to merge computers, laptops, phones and 
>>> tablets into a single conceptual package with, thus far, a singular 
>>> lack of success.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> snobby ppl who drive European cars and sip lattes always buy Apple
>>>>>> products. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Plenty of those wont touch them.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Mac OS? Been a free upgrade for years. Even before the Mac OS
>>>>>>> was free, it was very cheap, unlike Windows ripoff upgrades. It's
>>>>>>> interesting to note that the Mac OS/X operating system has had the
>>>>>>> same user interface since 2001, unlike Windows on PCs in the same
>>>>>>> timeframe.
>>>>>
>>>>>> that IS a good feature
>>>>>
>>>>> And you are free to run Win on them too if you want.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apple realised that Phones/Tablets have different operational and
>>>>>>> user interface requirements to Desktop/laptop computers hence we
>>>>>>> have 2 Apple operating systems. OS/X for desktops/laptops and iOS
>>>>>>> for phones/tablets.
>>>>>
>>>>>> no one in their right mind would buy a windows phone anyway..
>>>>>
>>>>> Quite a few do. Mainly so they have the same UI on the phone
>>>>> and the laptop etc.
>>>>
>>>> I guess so
>>>>
>>> Apple worked this out a long time ago at the dawn of the tablet era. 
>>> People want their devices to be compatible. They don't necessarily 
>>> want them to 'work' the same way. This is something Micr$oft doesn't 
>>> seem to find obvious. But then, it never has.
>>>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact the ipod touch is just an iphone with the phone missing.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> After all, it seems all smart phones have MP3 and video player
>>>>>>> functionality these days.
>>>>>
>>>>> But apple doesn’t compete at the very low cost end
>>>>> of smartphone and never has with stupid phones.
>>>>
>>>> apple products are unjustifiably expensive
>>>>
>>> Might I suggest you look at the innards of a Mac. They leave most of 
>>> the pack behind with respect to quality. You need to remember, Apple 
>>> aren't selling computers at the low end of the market but Acer, 
>>> Asus, Toshiba and many other brands do. These same brands also sell 
>>> into the upper market areas alongside Apple computer products. When 
>>> you look at the pricepoints of these products, they are very similar 
>>> in price and performance but the Mac still pips them on build 
>>> quality and design. I've pulled a few iMacs apart in my time, and 
>>> Mac desktops as well, and the build quality and design is extremely 
>>> good.
>
>


-- 
rgds,

Pete
-------
Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White,
Diversity, multiculturalism, inclusive society, are all code words for White Genocide!
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
http://ausnet.info/islam/lakemba.html
the picture that shocked the world!.. http://ausnet.info/islam/hypocrisy.jpg
"No need for concern. Only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940 only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How did that turn out?"
"ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"
-Barack Obama, idiotic President and Grand Imam of the USA

Back to aus.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 15:56 +1100
  Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 15:02 +1000
    Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-22 16:17 +1100
      Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 17:49 +1100
        Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:21 +1100
          Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 05:28 +1100
      Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 06:29 +0800
        Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:16 +1100
          Re: Windows OS Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2015-12-27 13:37 +1100
            Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +1100
              Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:43 +1100
          Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:41 +1100
            Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 18:08 +1100
              Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 19:30 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 20:06 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 21:27 +1100
                Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:59 +1000
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 22:15 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:31 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 07:08 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 08:47 +1100
                Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 08:39 +1000
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 15:54 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 16:46 +1100
                Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 18:29 +1100
                Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-29 22:00 +1000
                Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 22:09 +1000
                Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-30 21:21 +1000
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:20 +1100
          Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 17:13 +0800
    Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 12:34 +1100
      Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-23 12:09 +1000
        Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 14:51 +1100
      Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-23 15:03 +1100
      Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 18:22 +1100
  Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
  Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 19:25 +1100
  Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:33 +1100
  Re: Windows OS hislop <takecarebeware@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 22:25 +1100
  Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 14:32 +1100
    Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:00 +1100
      Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 16:15 +1100
        Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:35 +1100
        Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:35 +1100
          Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:47 +1000
          Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-26 20:01 +1100
            Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-26 22:12 +1100
              Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:02 +1100
                Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:22 +1100
            Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:34 +1100
              Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:03 +1100
      Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:20 +1100
        Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 05:21 +1100
    Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 18:21 +1100

csiph-web