Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #49565
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.cars, aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Windows OS |
| Date | 2015-12-27 15:41 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <de98goFddmjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <dds3f6F5p2hU1@mid.individual.net> <n5algf$hfp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5678dd08$0$1511$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <567f14c9$0$2908$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <567f4a13$0$1515$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"D Walford" <dwalford@internode.on.net> wrote in message news:567f4a13$0$1515$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com... > On 27/12/2015 9:29 AM, Clocky wrote: >> On 22/12/2015 1:17 PM, D Walford wrote: >>> On 22/12/2015 4:02 PM, XR8 Sprintless wrote: >>>> On 22/12/2015 2:56 PM, felix_unger wrote: >>>>> On 22-December-2015 3:20 PM, XR8 Sprintless wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So far I am yet to be convinced that Windows 10 is any better than >>>>>> Windows 7. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's more complicated (difficult to use) and designed to encourage ppl >>>>> to buy from the 'store'. I don't know why M$ never seem to appreciate >>>>> that simpler is better. >>>>> >>>> I have the benefit of industry specific training packages, however in >>>> saying that I still find that the interface is clunky and sometimes it >>>> does not take you where you actually want to go. >>>> >>>> For example settings on the start menu gives you limited access to >>>> certain settings, however to do anything you have to still go into >>>> control panel which can be accessed at least by right clicking on the >>>> start menu icon as well as computer management which is one I use all >>>> the time. >>>> >>>> >>> After my recent crash recovery I reinstalled Win7 because I had the >>> disc, now I keep getting messages to "upgrade" to 10. >>> Good idea or not? >>> I didn't mind 10 before the crash and I don't think it was the reason >>> the computer crashed because it was locking it before I installed 10. >>> For some reason the computer is a lot more stable now so I'm thinking I >>> should leave it alone despite it telling me that there is a hard drive >>> error. >>> >> >> As Rod suggested you should post you SMART data as it will tell you the >> condition of your drive and why you are receiving the error. The drive >> might have developed bad sectors and if it runs out of reserve sectors >> you will likely lose data so back-up anything important. >> >> There are any number of SMART drive monitors that are free to download >> and use but you can try this first: >> >> Click Start and in the search box type CMD and press Enter (open the >> Command Prompt) >> >> Type >> wmic >> and press Enter. >> >> Then type >> diskdrive get status >> and press Enter >> >> The returned status should say >> Status >> OK >> >> What are you getting? >> >> >> > Its says OK. > A Google search suggests that the problem might be the cable or where its > plugged into the mother board, That’s quite unlikely than the SMART report will tell me if that is the problem even if you don’t understand it. > I've checked the connection and it looks OK. > When I get time I will see if I have another cable. Makes more sense to get the SMART report first. > Funny though that since the crash and reinstall its been very stable, That might well be just because there is a bad part of the drive and after the reinstall, what is used most doesn’t happen to be on the drive there. Again, the SMART report will make that clear. > had a lockup yesterday (first one) but that's a lot better than one every > couple of hours. Its almost certainly dying and the SMART report will confirm that.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 15:56 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-22 15:02 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-22 16:17 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 17:49 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:21 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 05:28 +1100
Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 06:29 +0800
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:16 +1100
Re: Windows OS Jeßus <j@invalid.lan> - 2015-12-27 13:37 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:43 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:41 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 18:08 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 19:30 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 20:06 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:56 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 21:27 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:59 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-27 22:15 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:31 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 07:08 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 08:47 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 08:39 +1000
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 15:54 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 16:46 +1100
Re: Windows OS D Walford <dwalford@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-28 18:29 +1100
Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-29 22:00 +1000
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-29 22:09 +1000
Re: Windows OS keithr <no-one@nowhere.com.au> - 2015-12-30 21:21 +1000
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 05:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-12-27 17:13 +0800
Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 12:34 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-23 12:09 +1000
Re: Windows OS Trevor <trevor@home.net> - 2015-12-23 14:51 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-23 15:03 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 18:22 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 19:25 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-22 21:33 +1100
Re: Windows OS hislop <takecarebeware@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 22:25 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 14:32 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:00 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-24 16:15 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 16:35 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:35 +1100
Re: Windows OS XR8 Sprintless <xr8_sprint@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:47 +1000
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-26 20:01 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-26 22:12 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:02 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 12:22 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:34 +1100
Re: Windows OS felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-27 12:03 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 21:20 +1100
Re: Windows OS "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 05:21 +1100
Re: Windows OS Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-24 18:21 +1100
csiph-web